|
|
||||||
| Textbooks | Sell Textbooks | Books | Supplies | Medical Books | College Apparel | Movies | Clearance |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What does it take to turn ideas into action? What are the elements of a perfect pitch? How do you win the war for talent? How do you establish a brand without bucks? These are some of the issues everyone faces when starting or revitalizing any undertaking, and Guy Kawasaki, former marketing maven of Apple Computer, provides the answers. The Art of the Start will give you the essential steps to launch great products, services, and companiesA-whether you are dreaming of starting the next Microsoft or a not-for-profit thatA's going to change the world. It also shows managers how to unleash entrepreneurial thinking at established companies, helping them foster the pluck and creativity that their businesses need to stay ahead of the pack. Kawasaki provides readers with GISTA-Great Ideas for Starting ThingsA-including his field-tested insiderA's techniques for bootstrapping, branding, networking, recruiting, pitching, rainmaking, and, most important in this fickle consumer climate, building buzz. At Apple, Kawasaki helped turn ordinary customers into fanatics. As founder and CEO of Garage Technology Ventures, he has tested his iconoclastic ideas on real- world start- ups. And as an irrepressible columnist for Forbes, he has honed his best thinking about The Art of the Start. Explains how to transform ideas into action, offering a step-by-step approach to launching great products, services, and companies and demonstrating how managers can unleash a creative approach to business at established companies.
Read Me First The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!) but “ThatÂ’s funny....” —Isaac Asimov There are many ways to describe the ebb and flow, yin and yang, bubble-blowing and bubble-bursting phases of business cycles. HereÂ’s another one: microscopes and telescopes. In the microscope phase, thereÂ’s a cry for level-headed thinking, a return to fundamentals, and going “back to basics.” Experts magnify every detail, line item, and expenditure, and then demand full-blown forecasts, protracted market research, and all-encompassing competitive analysis. In the telescope phase, entrepreneurs bring the future closer. They dream up “the next big thing,” change the world, and make late-adopters eat their dust. Lots of money is wasted, but some crazy ideas do stick, and the world moves forward. When telescopes work, everyone is an astronomer, and the world is full of stars. When they donÂ’t, everyone whips out their microscopes, and the world is full of flaws. The reality is that you need both microscopes and telescopes to achieve success. The problem is that this means gathering information that is spread among hundreds of books, magazines, and conferences. It also means talking to dozens of experts and professionals—if you can get, and afford, an audience. You could spend all your time learning and not doing. And doing, not learning to do, is the essence of entrepreneurship. The Art of the Start alleviates this pain. My goal is to help you use your knowledge, love, and determination to create something great without getting bogged down in theory and unnecessary details. My presumption is that your goal is to change the world—not study it. If your attitude is “Cut the crap and just tell me what I need to do,” youÂ’ve come to the right place. You might be wondering, Who, exactly, is “you”? The reality is that “entrepreneur” is not a job title. It is the state of mind of people who want to alter the future. (It certainly isnÂ’t limited to Silicon Valley types seeking venture capital.) Hence, this book is for people in a wide range of startup endeavors: Great companies. Great divisions. Great schools. Great churches. Great not-for-profits. When it comes to the fundamentals of starting up, they are more alike than they are different. The key to their success is to survive the microscope tasks while bringing the future closer. LetÂ’s get started. The truth is, it is impossible to answer questions like this in advance, and they ultimately serve no purpose. On the one hand, talk and bravado are cheap. Saying youÂ’re willing to do something doesnÂ’t mean that you will do it. On the other hand, realizing that you have doubt and trepidation doesnÂ’t mean you wonÂ’t build a great organization. How you answer these questions now has little predictive power regarding what youÂ’ll actually do when you get caught up in a great idea. The truth is that no one really knows if he* is an entrepreneur until he becomes one—and sometimes not even then. There really is only one question you should ask yourself before starting any new venture: Meaning is not about money, power, or prestige. ItÂ’s not even about creating a fun place to work. Among the meanings of “meaning” are to Goals such as these are a tremendous advantage as you travel down the difficult path ahead. If you answer this question in the negative, you may still be successful, but it will be harder to become so because making meaning is the most powerful motivator there is. ItÂ’s taken me twenty years to come to this understanding. In 1983, when I started in the Macintosh Division of Apple Computer, beating IBM was our reason for existence. We wanted to send IBM back to the typewriter business holding its Selectric typewriter balls. In 1987, our reason for existence became beating Windows and Microsoft. We wanted to crush Microsoft and force Bill Gates to get a job flipping fish at the Pike Place Market. In 2004, I am a managing director in an early-stage venture capital firm called Garage Technology Ventures. I want to enable people to create great products, build great companies, and change the world. The causation of great organizations is the desire to make meaning. Having that desire doesnÂ’t guarantee that youÂ’ll succeed, but it does mean that if you fail, at least you failed doing something worthwhile. Crafting a mission statement is usually one of the first steps entrepreneurs undertake. Unfortunately, this process is usually a painful and frustrating experience that results in exceptional mediocrity. This is almost inevitable when a large number of people are commissioned to craft something designed to make an even larger number of people (employees, shareholders, customers, and partners) happy. The fundamental shortcoming of most mission statements is that everyone expects them to be highfalutin and all-encompassing. The result is a long, boring, commonplace, and pointless joke.* In The Mission Statement Book, Jeffrey Abrams provides 301 examples of mission statements that demonstrate that companies are all writing the same mediocre stuff. To wit, this is a partial list of the frequency with which mission statements in AbramsÂ’s sample contained the same words: Fortune (or Forbes, in my case) favors the bold, so IÂ’ll give you some advice that will make life easy for you: Postpone writing your mission statement. You can come up with it later when youÂ’re successful and have lots of time and money to waste. (If youÂ’re not successful, it wonÂ’t matter that you didnÂ’t develop one.) Instead of a mission statement and all the baggage that comes with it, craft a mantra for your organization. The definition of mantra is The beauty of a mantra is that everyone expects it to be short and sweet. (Arguably, the worldÂ’s shortest mantra is the single Hindi word Om.) You may never have to write your mantra down, publish it in your annual report, or print it on posters. Indeed, if you do have to “enforce” your mantra in these ways, itÂ’s not the right mantra. Following are five examples that illustrate the power of a good mantra: Compare the Starbucks mantra, “Rewarding everyday moments,” to the companyÂ’s mission statement, “Establish Starbucks as the premier purveyor of the finest coffee in the world while maintaining our uncompromising principles while we grow.” Which is more memorable? Imagine that someone asks your parents or your organizationÂ’s receptionist what you do. Can it get any better than a three-word mantra such as “Authentic athletic performance”?* A final thought on mantras: DonÂ’t confuse mantras and tag lines. A mantra is for your employees; itÂ’s a guideline for what they do in their jobs. A tag line is for your customers; itÂ’s a guideline for how to use your product or service. For example, NikeÂ’s mantra is “Authentic athletic performance.” Its tag line is “Just do it.” My goal in giving you this advice is not to reduce the sales of Microsoft Office—remember, IÂ’m off the anti-Microsoft podium. ThereÂ’s a time for using all three applications, but itÂ’s not now. What you should do is (a) rein in your anal tendency to craft a document and (b) implement. This means building a prototype, writing software, launching your Web site, or offering your services. The hardest thing about getting started is getting started. (This is as true for a writer as it is for an entrepreneur.) Remember: No one ever achieved success by planning for gold. You should always be selling—not strategizing about selling. DonÂ’t test, test, test—thatÂ’s a game for big companies. DonÂ’t worry about being embarrassed. DonÂ’t wait to develop the perfect product or service. Good enough is good enough. There will be plenty of time for refinement later. ItÂ’s not how great you start—itÂ’s how great you end up. The enemy of activation is cogitation, and at this stage, cogitating the “strategic” issues of research and development is a problem. Questions like, How far can we leap ahead? What if everyone doesnÂ’t like what we do? and Should we design for a target customer or make what we would want to use? are beside the point when youÂ’re getting a new venture off the ground. Instead, observe these key principles of getting going: Car design is a good example of the love-versus-hate reaction; consider the bifurcation of peopleÂ’s reactions to cars such as the Mini Cooper, Infiniti Fx45, and Toyota Scion xB. People are either devoted fans or relentless critics, and thatÂ’s good. “I WANT ONE.” This is the best kind of market research—the customer and the designer are the same person. Therefore, the customerÂ’s voice can reach the designerÂ’s mind uncorrupted by corporate politics, reliance on the status quo, and market researchers. Example: Ferdinand Porsche said, “In the beginning I looked around and, not finding the automobile of my dreams, decided to build it myself.”* “MY EMPLOYER COULDNÂ’T (OR WOULDNÂ’T) DO IT.” Not as romantic as “I want one,” but this is a credible path. You already understand the customer base, competition, supply sources, and industry contacts because of your background. You still need to build the product or service and get customers, but many questions are already answered. For example, alumni of Unit 8200 of the Israeli Defense Forces went on to create companies such as Checkpoint after developing security software for the military. “WHAT THE HELL—ITÂ’S POSSIBLE!” This theory isnÂ’t popular when times are tough, and microscopes are flourishing. At these times, the world has turned conservative and demands that every market be “proven.” Markets for curve-jumping, paradigm-shifting leaps are seldom proven in advance. For example, when Motorola invented cellular telephones, no one leaped to buy them. At that time, portable phone was an oxymoron because phones were always attached to places. There was no market for phones that customers could move. “THERE MUST BE A BETTER WAY.” The organization born of this philosophy is based on the idealistic notion that you can make the world a better place by doing something new. In many cases, the founders had backgrounds with no logical connection to the business. They simply got an idea and decided to do it. Example: eBay. Pierre Omidyar, the founder, wanted to implement a system for a “perfect market” for the sale of goods. (The story of his girlfriend wanting to sell Pez dispensers was an after-the-fact PR tale.) The wisest course of action is to take your best shot with a prototype, immediately get it to market, and iterate quickly. If you wait for ideal circumstances in which you have all the information you need (which is impossible), the market will pass you by. The expected outcome of the “get going” principle is a first release of a product or service. Remember: it wonÂ’t be perfect. But donÂ’t revise your product to get prospective customers to love it. Instead, revise it because customers already love it. Let me put it in religious terms: Some people believe that if they change, God will love them. Others believe that since God loves them, they should change. The latter theory is the prototype to keep in mind for how to get going and keep going for startups. More elegantly stated, the first question involves defining your customer and the pain that he feels. The second question centers around creating a sales mechanism to ensure that your revenues exceed your costs. Here are some tips to help you develop your business model: My final tip is that you ask women—and only women. My theory is that deep in the DNA of men is a “killer” gene. This gene expresses itself by making men want to kill people, animals, and plants. To a large degree, society has repressed this gene; however, starting an organization whose purpose is to kill another organization is still socially acceptable. Hence, asking a man about a business model is useless because every business model looks good to someone with the Y chromosome. For example, Sun Microsystems wants to kill Microsoft. When is the last time you bought a computer based on whom the manufacturer wanted to kill? Women, by contrast, donÂ’t have this killer gene. Thus, they are much better judges of the viability of a business model than men are. DonÂ’t agree with me? The book The Darwin Awards provides irrefutable proof of womenÂ’s greater common sense. These awards commemorate “those individuals who have removed themselves from the gene pool in a sublimely idiotic fashion.”* For example, in 1998 two construction workers fell to their demise after cutting a circular hole in the floor while they were standing in the middle of the circle.† The Darwin Awards contains nine chapters about the stupidity of men, and one chapter about the stupidity of women. I rest my case. The purpose of compiling the MAT is to understand the scope of what youÂ’re undertaking, test assumptions quickly, and provide a method to find and fix the large flaws in your thinking. There are other tasks (weÂ’ll come to them soon) that are also important to the survival of the organization, but none are as important as these milestones. The timing of these milestones will drive the timing of just about everything else you need to do, so spend 80 percent of your effort on them. Continuously track these assumptions, and when they prove false, react to them quickly. Ideally, you can link these assumptions to one of the seven milestones discussed above. Thus, as you reach a milestone, you can test an assumption. The point of the list of tasks is to understand and appreciate the totality of what your organization has to accomplish, and to not let anything slip through the cracks in the early, often euphoric days. The “arts” that this book describes are equally appropriate for internal entrepreneurs—they, too, must innovate, position, pitch, write business plans, bootstrap, recruit, raise capital, partner, establish brands, make rain, and be mensches. But there are special recommendations that apply in this case. Ironically, many independent entrepreneurs envy the employees of big companies—they think that these lucky souls have humongous financial resources, large sales forces, fully equipped labs, scalable factories, and established brands, plus medical and dental benefits, at their disposal. How wonderful it would be, guys in garages muse, to invent a new product or service with the luxury of such an infrastructure already in place. Guess again. Creating a new product or service inside such a beast is not necessarily easier; the challenges are just different. I happen to have been part of a “best-case” scenario: the Macintosh Division of Apple. I can explain the success of this internal entrepreneurial effort in two words: Steve Jobs. His off-the-scale design talents, maniacal attention to detail, and reality-distorting personality (plus co-founder status) made Macintosh successful. Were it not for Steve Jobs, Macintosh would not exist—or it would have taken the form of an Apple II with a trash can. But if it takes a Steve Jobs to innovate within large companies, you are undoubtedly thinking, we might as well give up right now. While that kind of visionary is in short supply in any business, anyone with guts, vision, and political savvy should be able to set up an entrepreneurial outpost in an established business. I collaborated on this minichapter with Bill Meade, a close friend who helped Hewlett-Packard organize its substantial vault of intellectual property. We came up with this list of recommendations for internal entrepreneurs. You can reduce these fears by diving into the business and making a little progress every day. One day youÂ’ll wake up and you wonÂ’t be afraid anymore—or at least youÂ’ll have a whole new set of fears. No matter what, never admit that youÂ’re scared to other employees. A CEO can never have a bad day. But donÂ’t go overboard, either, and act as if you have no concerns, because then they will know youÂ’re scared stiff. Q. Should I share my secret ideas with anybody other than my dog? Assuming that you can implement, there are two kinds of people you can recruit. First, you can get a mentor. This would be an older person who is willing to coach you from time to time but never actually do any work. Second, you could get a business partner. This is someone whoÂ’s willing to work side by side with you—even on a part-time basis—whose skill set complements yours. Either kind of person can make a big difference in your business. Q. Do I need a Web site? Guy Kawasaki, who helped make Macintosh a household name, now runs Garage Technology Ventures, a venture-capital firm. He has held his workshop, -ôBoot Camp for Start-ups,-ö around the world. Kawasaki is the author of seven previous books, including Rules for Revolutionaries. Kawasaki has been a Silicon Valley fixture since he helped put Apple Computer Company on the map. Since then, he has started a successful venture capital company and written seven books (e.g., Rules for Revolutionaries). His newest work addresses entrepreneurs who want to grow beyond being a company of one as well as innovators who work for large companies. Kawasaki writes in a conversational style that references his own life experience and sources as divergent as Peter Drucker and Seth Godin. The result is a handbook that has lots of useful information, though it will cause most would-be start-up artists to think twice about ever approaching a venture capitalist. It will also inspire people with great ideas to think hard about building a solid business with real cash flow. Unfortunately, the book seems to be written around the needs of technology start-ups and is not quite as useful for traditional businesses. Therefore, only public libraries with a vast business collection should add, but business school libraries should consider.-Stephen Turner, Turner & Assocs., San Francisco Copyright 2004 Reed Business Information. Kawasaki (Rules for Revolutionaries) draws upon his dual background as an evangelist for Apple's Macintosh computer and as a Silicon Valley venture capitalist in this how-to for launching any type of business project. Each chapter begins with "GIST" ("great ideas for starting things"), covering a variety of facets to consider, from identifying your customer base and writing a business plan to establishing partnerships and building brand identity. Minichapters zero in on particular jobs that will need doing, while FAQ sections address the questions readers are most likely to have: Kawasaki covers the basics in an effectively casual tone. Much of the advice, however, consists of generic banalities-start your company's name with a letter that comes early in the alphabet, use big type in presentation slides for older businessmen with declining eyesight, and avoid writing e-mails in all capital letters-that can be found in any mediocre guide. Fortunately, Kawasaki does rise to the occasion here and there. He goes into great detail when it comes to raising capital and offers effective methods for sorting through the nonsense associated with interviewing prospective employees. (Sept. 9) Forecast: Drawn in part from readers of the Forbes column from which the book takes its title, Kawasaki's fan base will seek this one out (and overlook the weaker sections to get to the usable nuggets). Copyright 2004 Reed Business Information. |
|
Buy Textbooks Sell Textbooks College Apparel Shop by School Virtual Bookstores |
Order Status Shipping Rates Return Policy Marketplace Info F.A.S.T. |
Contact Us Privacy Policy Legal Notices Site Security Employment |
Help Desk eCampus Blog Affiliate Program Bulk Orders College Marketing |
|
|
|||||
| . | |||||