|
I. Fundamentals of Ergonomics |
|
|
|
A Guide to Certification in Professional Ergonomics |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (5) |
|
BCPE Certification Requirements |
|
|
6 | |
|
Criteria for Certification |
|
|
|
Procedures for Certification |
|
|
|
Examination Administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written Examination Approximate Weighting of Subject Areas |
|
|
|
Magnitude of Occupationally-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (9) |
|
Criteria for Selection and Review of Articles |
|
|
|
Literature Search Methods |
|
|
|
Analysis of Study Results |
|
|
|
Measures of Workplace Exposures |
|
|
|
Measures of Musculoskeletal Disorder Outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
10 | (9) |
|
Work-Related Physical Factors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 | |
|
Legal Issues in Occupational Ergonomics |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Your) Involvement with the Law |
|
|
|
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
The Prediction of Behavior |
|
|
|
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
Description of the Discipline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cognitive Impairment Complexity |
|
|
|
|
|
9 | (6) |
|
Full and Timely Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Records Requested from Expert Witnesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Opinion Testimony |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 | |
|
Cost Justification for Implementing Ergonomics Intervention |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
Productivity and Profit for an Enterprise Is Compatible with Good Working Conditions |
|
|
|
Why Should Economics be Part of Ergonomics? |
|
|
|
Using Financial Arguments |
|
|
|
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
How is Work Valued in Economics? |
|
|
|
What Models Suit Ergonomists? |
|
|
|
What Do We Need to Measure? |
|
|
|
What Are the Limitations of Cost-Benefit Analysis? |
|
|
|
What Are the Benefits of Enterprise-Based Cost-Benefit Analysis? |
|
|
|
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
Cost-Benefit Analysis as a Checklist |
|
|
|
Cost-Benefit Analysis Assumptions |
|
|
|
A Cost-Benefit Analysis Model: The Productivity Assessment Tool |
|
|
|
|
|
9 | |
|
Warehouse Work --- Truck Loading |
|
|
|
Manual Handling Made Easy: Barrel Handling |
|
|
|
Manual Handling in Coal Mines |
|
|
|
Humans in Work System Environment |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives and Structure of the Article |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Overview of Selected System Approaches |
|
|
2 | (8) |
|
General System Theory and Cybernetics |
|
|
|
Socio-Technical System Approach |
|
|
|
Evolution-Theoretical Approach |
|
|
|
Engineering-Scientific System Approaches |
|
|
|
Sociologically Formed System Approaches |
|
|
|
Work System Approach as an Analytical Framework |
|
|
10 | (8) |
|
Overview of Work System Approach |
|
|
|
Elements of a Work System |
|
|
|
Systematic Design of Work Systems |
|
|
18 | (6) |
|
Process of Work System Design |
|
|
|
Corrective and Conceptive Work System Design |
|
|
|
Sequential and Integrated Work System Design |
|
|
|
Technocentric and Anthropocentric Work System Design |
|
|
|
Approaches to Anticipatory Work System Design |
|
|
24 | (23) |
|
|
|
|
Inter-relations between Ordering Model and Work System Approach |
|
|
|
Identification of Recovery Times in Heat Work as an Example of Work System Design at Level SI |
|
|
|
Coordination of Movements as an Example of Work System Design at Level S2 |
|
|
|
User-Centered Design of an Autonomous Production Cell (APC) as an Example of Work System Design at Level S3 |
|
|
|
Computer-Based Prospective Job Design and Evaluation with Space + as an Example of Work System Design at Level S4 |
|
|
|
Criteria-Based Identification of Areas for Group Work as an Example of Work System Design at Level S5 |
|
|
|
Aachener PPC-Model as an Example of Work System Design at Level S6 |
|
|
|
Cooperation between Companies as an Example of Work System Design at Level S7 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 | |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
Introduction: TQM and Human Factors Programs in Industry |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Fundamentals: The Basic Tenets of TQM and Human Factors |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
Applications of TQM and Ergonomics to Each Other |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
|
|
6 | |
|
User-Centered Design of Information Technology |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primer: The Need for User-Centered Design (UCD) |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Tools and Techniques for UCD |
|
|
8 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
Understanding Users, Their Needs, and Their Work |
|
|
|
Testing and Evaluation of Proposed Design Solutions |
|
|
|
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
|
35 | |
|
Application of Risk Theory in Man--Machine--Environment Systems |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relation between Safety and Technical Risk |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Technical Risk |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complex Method of Risk Evaluation in the Workplace |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
Procedure for Risk Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application of Risk Management in Maintenance |
|
|
8 | |
|
Engineering Anthropometry |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Designing to Fit the Body |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
|
|
|
To Determine a Single (Distinct) Percentile Point |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
|
8 | (14) |
|
Estimation by ``Ratio Scaling'' |
|
|
|
Estimation by Regression Equation |
|
|
|
Estimation by Probability Statistics |
|
|
|
Combining Anthropometric Data Sets |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
The ``Normative'' Adult versus ``Real Persons'' |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
|
25 | (4) |
|
|
|
29 | |
|
Human Strength Evaluation |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Background and Terminology |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Relation Between Muscle Length and Tension |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
Muscle Endurance and Fatigue |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Muscle Tension and Its Internal Transmission to the Point of Application |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
Muscle Tension --- ``Muscle Strength'' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
External Application --- ``Body (Segment) Strength'' |
|
|
|
Assessment of Body Segment Strength |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designing for Body Strength |
|
|
10 | (11) |
|
Designing for Hand Strength |
|
|
|
The Use of Tables of Exerted Torques and Forces |
|
|
|
Designing for Foot Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
21 | |
|
Biomechanical Basis for Ergonomics |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
Biomechanic Analyses and Ergonomics |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
Occupational Biomechanics Approach |
|
|
|
|
|
2 | (11) |
|
The Load --- Tolerance Construct |
|
|
|
Acute vs. Cumulative Trauma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
External and Internal Loading |
|
|
|
Factors Affecting Internal Loading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Application of Biomechanics to the Workplace |
|
|
13 | (14) |
|
Biomechanics of Commonly Affected Body Structures |
|
|
|
Analysis and Control Measures Used in the Workplace |
|
|
27 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 Revised NIOSH Equation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Muscle System Models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 | |
|
Fundamentals of Manual Control |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Fundamentals of Systems and Control Theory |
|
|
2 | (8) |
|
Linear, Time-Invariant Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motivation and Overview of Human Manual Control Models |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
Quasi-Linear Function Theory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 | (7) |
|
The Problem with Modeling Humans |
|
|
|
Quasi-Linear Pilot Models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Model Parametrization: Structural-Isomorphic Models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Optimal Control Model |
|
|
18 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
Mathematical Formulation of the OCM Parameters |
|
|
|
Model Parameters, Outputs, Solution, and Identification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 | |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
A Description of Cumulative Loading |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Tissue-Based Evidence for Cumulative Injuries |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
In Vitro Cumulative Loading Response and Tolerance Limits |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
Cumulative Injury Theories |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Workplace Studies Documenting Cumulative Exposure |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
Towards a Cumulative Compression Tolerance Limit Value (TLV) |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
Challenges of Documenting Cumulative Exposure |
|
|
15 | (6) |
|
2D-vs. 3D-Biomechanical Models |
|
|
|
Static, Quasi-Dynamic or Quasi-Static and Dynamic Models |
|
|
|
Extrapolation of Short-Time Periods to Represent a Shift Exposure |
|
|
|
Reducing the Information to Represent Task Exposure |
|
|
|
What Exposure Variable Should Be Used to Quantify Dose Exposure? |
|
|
|
|
|
21 | |
|
Low-Level Static Exertions |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Low-Level Static Exertions in the Workplace |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
What Are ``Static Exertions''? |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
Which Work Requirements Induce ``Low-Level Static Exertions''? |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Why Do ``Low-Level Static Exertions'' Imply a Risk? |
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
How to Prevent Musculoskeletal Disorders from ``Low-Level Static Exertions''? |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Recommendation for the Practitioner Regarding Job Profile and Workplace Design |
|
|
10 | |
|
Soft-Tissue Pathomechanics |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
Soft-Tissue Pathomechanics |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Skeletal Muscle Physiology |
|
|
2 | (6) |
|
Muscle Physiology and Anatomy |
|
|
|
Cellular Processes Initiating Muscle Contractions |
|
|
|
Force Generation and Transmission in Skeletal Muscle |
|
|
|
Types of Muscle Contractions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contraction-Induced Injury Models |
|
|
8 | (5) |
|
|
|
|
Animal Models of Muscle Performance and Injury |
|
|
|
|
|
13 | (9) |
|
|
|
|
Eccentric Muscle Actions in Acute Myofiber Injury |
|
|
|
Factors Affecting Acute Muscle Injury |
|
|
|
Cellular Biology of Muscle Damage |
|
|
22 | (5) |
|
Strain Injuries and Skeletal Muscle |
|
|
|
Physical Damage to Tissue |
|
|
|
Intracellular Ca2+ and Muscle Damage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Muscle Regeneration and Repair |
|
|
|
Muscle Injuries Associated with Low-Force Repetitive Tasks |
|
|
|
Long-Term Changes in Muscle in Response to Injuries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Future Work |
|
|
27 | |
|
The Need for More Refined In Vivo Models |
|
|
|
The Need for Tissue Mechanobiology Studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanisms for Pain and Injury in Musculoskeletal Disorders |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
Neurophysiologic Mechanisms of Pain |
|
|
2 | (6) |
|
Neural Anatomy Relevant to Pain |
|
|
|
Tissue Injury, Central Sensitization, and Pain |
|
|
|
Biochemical Mediators of Pain |
|
|
|
Neuroimmunologic Responses in the CNS |
|
|
|
Implications for MSD: Pain Mechanisms and Injury Biomechanics |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Confounding Factors Affecting Pain |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
Implications for MSD: Applications and Future Research |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
|
12 | |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Language Production and Comprehension |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
How can Employers Maximize the Productivity of Older Adults? |
|
|
10 | (5) |
|
Matching KSAOs of Tasks to those of the Worker |
|
|
|
Putting Experience to Work by Using Well-Learned Skills |
|
|
|
Making Use of the Speed-Accuracy Trade-off |
|
|
|
Complex Tasks and Multiple Task Environments |
|
|
|
Using Environmental Support to Reduce Memory Load |
|
|
|
Experience and Decision-Making |
|
|
|
Equipment Factors for Improving Worker/Task Match |
|
|
|
Environmental Factors for Improving Worker/Task Match |
|
|
|
Promoting Safety on the Job with Warnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions and Recommendations |
|
|
15 | |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
Visual Acuity and Refractive Error |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Acuity, Refractive Error, and Job Performance |
|
|
4 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Factors and Musculoskeletal Disorders |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
What Do Individual Factors Associated with MSK Disorders Represent? |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
Concommitant External/Internal Exposures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where in the Course of MSK Disorders Do Individual Factors Operate? |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intervention Effectiveness |
|
|
|
How Can We Estimate the Contribution of Individual Factors to MSK Disorders? |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
|
7 | |
|
Rehabilitating Low Back Disorders |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
The Injury Process --- Tissues Damage |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
The Injury Process --- Motor Changes |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Instability as a Cause of Injury |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
On Stability: The Foundation |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
A Philosophy of Low Back Exercise Prescription |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
Training Rectus Abdominis, the Obliques and Transverse Abdominis |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Training the Back Extensors (and Stabilizers) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
The Beginner's Program for Stabilization |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
Advanced Techniques --- A General Approach to Preparing the Occupational Athlete |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
|
16 | |
|
Human Adaptation in the Workplace |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Occupational Adaptation Process |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Adaptive Response Generation Subprocess |
|
|
|
Adaptive Response Evaluation Subprocess |
|
|
|
Adaptive Response Integration Subprocess |
|
|
|
Work Variables Impacting Individual Adaptation |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
|
4 | |
|
Rehabilitation Ergonomics |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Laws and Regulations That Effect Rehabilitation Ergonomics |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Rehabilitation Ergonomics Components |
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
Functional Capacity Testing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rehabilitation Ergonomics as Part of a Medical Continuum |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Three Models of Rehabilitation Ergonomics for Return to Work |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
Case Study I: Clinical Model |
|
|
|
Case Study II: Combined Clinical and Worksite Model |
|
|
|
Case Study III: Worksite Model |
|
|
|
The Aging Worker: Special Considerations |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Rehabilitation Ergonomics in Prevention |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Challenges for the Future |
|
|
13 | |
|
Visual, Tactile, and Multimodal Information Processing |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (10) |
|
|
|
12 | (5) |
|
Combining Vision, Touch, and Other Modalities: The Benefits and Limitations of Multimodal Information Presentation |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
Multimodal Interface Design to Date |
|
|
|
Crossmodal Constraints on Multimodal Information Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
21 | |
|
Applying Cognitive Psychology to System Development |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Defining the Design Problem: Initial User Studies |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Consideration of the User During the Evaluation of a Proposed Design |
|
|
3 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 | |
|
The Role Personality in Ergonomics |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
Personality Assessments for Use in Occupational Settings |
|
|
3 | (6) |
|
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory |
|
|
|
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator |
|
|
|
Eysenck Personality Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Type A Personality Behavior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personality Traits and Physical Outcomes |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Personality, Low Back Pain, and Spinal Loading |
|
|
|
Personality and Loading on the Upper Extremities |
|
|
|
|
|
10 | |
|
Psychosocial Work Factors |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Examples of Psychosocial Work Factors |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
Occupational Ergonomics and Psychosocial Work Factors |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Measurement of Psychosocial Work Factors |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Managing and Controlling Psychosocial Work Factors |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
|
8 | |
|
Biomechanical Modeling for the Shoulder |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
Theoretical Consideration |
|
|
|
Method of Geometrical Description |
|
|
|
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
|
|
11 | |
|
Application of Ergonomics to the Low Back |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Assessment of Weight Lifted |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Assessment of Trunk Moment |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Assessment of Trunk Posture |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
Assessment of Trunk Motion |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Assessment of Other Manual Material Handling Modes |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Assessment of Whole-Body Vibration |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Assessment of Psychosocial Work Characteristics and Responses |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Summary of Assessment Tools |
|
|
7 | |
|
Application of Ergonomics to the Legs |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Lower Extremity Injuries: Is There an Occupational Problem? |
|
|
1 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preventing Injury: Types of Ergonomics Controls |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Help for Those in Kneeling Postures |
|
|
|
|
|
8 | |
|
Application of Ergonomics of the Foot |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
Causes/Solutions of Falls |
|
|
|
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 | |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
|
|
|
Physical Quantification: Sound Levels and the Decibel Scale |
|
|
|
Psychophysical Quantification: Loudness Scales |
|
|
|
Effects of Noise in Occupational Settings |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
Signal Detection and Communications Effects |
|
|
|
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss |
|
|
|
Measurement and Quantification of Noise Exposures |
|
|
11 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
Measures for Quantifying Occupational Noise Levels |
|
|
|
Industrial Noise Regulation and Abatement |
|
|
23 | |
|
Indicators of the Need for Attention to Noise |
|
|
|
Hearing Conservation Programs and the Systems Approach |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
|
7 | |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
Vibration Measurements Basics |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
Occupational Vibration Standards/Guides |
|
|
7 | (5) |
|
Whole-Body Vibration Standards/Guides Used in the U.S. |
|
|
|
Hand-Arm Vibration Standards/Guides Used in the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
12 | |
|
|
|
|
Overview of Ergonomic Assessment |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Use of Assessment Tools by Practitioners |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Health and Medical Indicators |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
|
|
4 | (7) |
|
Material Handling Assessment Tools |
|
|
|
Psychophysical Data Tables |
|
|
|
Upper Extremity Assessment Tools |
|
|
|
Entire Body Assessment Tools |
|
|
|
|
|
11 | |
|
Low Back Injury Risk Assessment Tools |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
LMM Risk Assessment Model |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
Three-Dimensional Static Strength Prediction Program Model |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Discussion of Similarities and Differences |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Additional Low Back Risk Assessment Tool Needs |
|
|
7 | |
|
Cognitive Task Analysis --- A Review |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction to Cognitive Task Analysis |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Cognitive Task Analysis of Teams |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
Current Trends and the Future of CTA |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
|
6 | (22) |
|
Stage 1: Initial Literature Review of Existing CTA Methods |
|
|
|
Stage 2: Initial Methods Screening |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary and Recommendations for CTA in C4i Systems |
|
|
28 | |
|
Subjective Scales of Effort and Workload Assessment |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Subjective Workload Assessment |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Scales of Perceived Physical Effort |
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
Borg's Scales for Perceived Exertion |
|
|
|
Other Scales of Perceived Effort |
|
|
|
Subjective Scales for Postural Assessment |
|
|
|
Subjective Scales of Mental Workload Measurement |
|
|
7 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
Subjective Workload Assessment Technique |
|
|
|
Modified Cooper-Harper Scale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Methods of Mental Workload Assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
13 | |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
Physical Fatigue Allowances |
|
|
|
Mental Fatigue Allowances |
|
|
|
Environmental Fatigue Allowances |
|
|
|
Overview of ILO Fatigue Allowances |
|
|
|
Temporal Aspects of Fatigue |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 | |
|
Guideline 1: Have a Work Scheduling Policy |
|
|
|
Guideline 2: Optimize Stimulation During Work |
|
|
|
Guideline 3: Minimize the Fatigue Dose |
|
|
|
Guideline 4: Use Work Breaks |
|
|
|
Guideline 5: Use Frequent Short Breaks |
|
|
|
Guideline 6: Maximize the Recovery Rate |
|
|
|
Guideline 7: Increase the Recovery/Work Ratio |
|
|
|
Wrist Posture in Office Work |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction --- Ergonomic Relevance |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Anatomic vs. Physiologic Wrist Neutral Zone |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Wrist Neutral Zone --- Experimental Evidence |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
Self-Selected Wrist Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keyboarding and Upper Extremity |
|
|
5 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
The Effect of Alternative Design on CTS Risk Factors |
|
|
|
Training Effect on Typing on Ergonomic Keyboards |
|
|
|
|
|
11 | |
|
PLIBEL --- A Method Assigned for Identification of Ergonomics Hazards |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
|
6 | |
|
The ACGIH TLV® for Hand Activity Level |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
The Basis for a TLV on Hand Activity Level |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
|
|
5 | (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Determining Compliance with the TLV |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
|
|
12 | |
|
REBA and RULA: Whole Body and Upper Limb Rapid Assessment Tools |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
|
4 | (4) |
|
Example 1: Filing Medical Notes |
|
|
|
Example 2: Raising a Cot Side |
|
|
|
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
Step 1 --- Observing and Selecting the Postures to Assess |
|
|
|
Step 2 --- Scoring and Recording the Posture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 | |
|
An Assessment Technique for Postural Loading on the Upper Body (LUBA) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Posture Classification Scheme |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
Relative Discomfort Scores by Joint Motions |
|
|
|
Posture Evaluation Procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
|
7 | |
|
The Washington State SHARP Approach to Exposure Assessment |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Exposure Parameters, Measurement Strategy, and Measurement Methods |
|
|
1 | (7) |
|
Self-Report Questionnaires |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Measurement Methods |
|
|
|
SHARP Study Exposure Assessment Methods |
|
|
8 | (11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Job Analysis (Significant Force Analysis) |
|
|
|
Posture Analysis, Event Based vs. Time Based |
|
|
|
Repetitive Exertion Analysis |
|
|
|
Repetitive Movement Analysis |
|
|
|
Work Organization Measurement |
|
|
|
|
|
19 | |
|
Upper Extremity Analysis of the Wrist |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
Anatomy of the Hand and Wrist |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
Bones of the Hand and Wrist |
|
|
|
Joints of the Hand and Wrist |
|
|
|
Muscles of the Forearm, Hand, and Wrist |
|
|
|
The Flexor Digitorum Profundus and Flexor Digitorum Superficialis |
|
|
|
Flexor Tendon Sheath Pulley Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Select Anthropometry Data |
|
|
|
Models of the Hand and Wrist |
|
|
9 | (11) |
|
Static Tendon Pulley Models |
|
|
|
Dynamic Tendon-Pulley Models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Two-Dimensional Hand and Wrist Model |
|
|
|
Direct Measurement Studies |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Data-Driven WRMSD Risk Index |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
|
|
25 | |
|
Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Obtaining and Using the Data |
|
|
6 | (9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
Step 2: Single- and Multi-Task Procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Using the RWL and LI to Guide Ergonomics Design |
|
|
|
Rationale and Limitations for LI |
|
|
|
Job-Related Intervention Strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
20 | (5) |
|
Loading Supply Rolls, Example 1 |
|
|
|
Dish-Washing Machine Unloading, Example 2 |
|
|
|
Validation of the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation |
|
|
25 | |
|
Psychophysical Approach to Task Analysis |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
Introduction to Psychophysics |
|
|
|
The Current State of Psychophysical Data |
|
|
|
The Psychophysical Approach to Designing Manual Materials Handling Tasks |
|
|
3 | (22) |
|
Setting Weight and Force Limits |
|
|
|
Task and Workplace Design |
|
|
|
The Psychophysical Approach to Designing Upper Extremity Tasks |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
Setting Acceptable Force and Frequency Limits |
|
|
|
Tool and Workplace Design |
|
|
|
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Psychophysical Approach |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
|
28 | |
|
Static Biomechanical Modeling in Manual Lifting |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Development of Static Strength Prediction Programs |
|
|
2 | (4) |
|
Computerization of Strength Prediction and Back Force Prediction Models |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
Validation of Strength and Back Force Prediction Models |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
|
|
11 | |
|
Industrial Lumbar Motion Monitor |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Occupational Back Injuries |
|
|
|
Tools for Analyzing Low Back Injury Risk |
|
|
|
Development of the Industrial Lumbar Motion Monitor |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
Calibration and Measurement Accuracy |
|
|
|
Development of the LBD Risk Model |
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validation and Predictive Ability |
|
|
|
Benefits of the iLMM and the LBD Risk Model |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Applications: How to Use the iLMM and LBD Risk Model |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
Adjustable Industrial Lumbar Motion Monitor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selecting the Job(s) to Monitor |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Defining the Major Components of the Job through a Task Analysis |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Collecting and Recording Workplace Data for Risk Assessment |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Setting Up the iLMM for Data Collection |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
Selecting the Correct iLMM Size |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Putting the iLMM on the Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Analyzing and Interpreting the iLMM Data |
|
|
16 | |
|
Trunk Kinematic Information |
|
|
|
Probability of High-Risk Group Membership (LBD Risk) |
|
|
|
Interpreting Results from Several Individuals |
|
|
|
The ACGIH TLV® for Low Back Risk |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
TLV Development Background |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 | |
|
|
|
|
Instructions for Determining the Lifting TLV |
|
|
|
If a Lifting Task Exceeds the TLV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Index |
|
1 | |