| Transaction Introduction |
|
xiii | |
| Preface |
|
xxxi | |
|
The Primary Functions of the State |
|
|
1 | (22) |
|
Most writers treat merely of formal governmental system |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
This method of treatment misleading |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Method of electing United States President not the way provided by the Constitution |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Political customs important |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Administrative system should be studied |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
If extra-legal institutions are considered, governmental systems are found to be similar |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
Distinction of the expression from the execution of the state will |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
The basis of the principle of the separation of powers |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
Adoption of the principle in United States |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Differentiation of primary functions |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Politics and Administration |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Meaning of ``Administration'' |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
|
|
23 | (24) |
|
Necessity of harmony between making and enforcement of law |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Executing authority must be subordinated to law-making authority |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Political control may develop extra-legally |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Function of politics has to do with the function of executing state will |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Influence of extra-legal forces |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Party system in United States |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
|
30 | (3) |
|
Legal recognition of party |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
Methods of expressing state will |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
Control of politics over administration |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Proper extent of this control |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Result of too great extent |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Limitations of this control |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
Independence of judicial authorities |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
Independence of local administrative authorities |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
Central and Local Politics |
|
|
47 | (25) |
|
States based on federal idea |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Central and local competence |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
Effect of local self-government |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
Effect of administrative centralization |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
Approach of the two systems |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Tendency in England and United States |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Tendency on the Continent |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
Ineffectiveness of constitutional prohibition of special legislation in United States |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
Influence of party system in United States |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
Continental methods of securing local autonomy |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Advantages of administrative centralization |
|
|
68 | (4) |
|
The Function of Administration |
|
|
72 | (22) |
|
Administration of justice |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Administration of government |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Maintenance of organization |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Political control over administration |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Should be extended to execution of law |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
But not to other parts of administration |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
Separation of politics and administration |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
Position of judicial officers |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Same position should be given to administrative officers |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
Permanence of executive officers |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
Conditions in Switzerland |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Permanence of executive officers incompatible with popular government |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Administrative officers should be permanent |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
The Effect of the Administrative System on the Relations of Politics and Administration |
|
|
94 | (39) |
|
Two kinds of administrative systems |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
Decentralized administrative system |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Makes administrative officers political |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
American administrative system |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
A development of the English system |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Absence of central supervision |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Failure of legislative control |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Party had to assume control |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
|
106 | (4) |
|
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
Centralization of national administration |
|
|
114 | (4) |
|
Made administrative officers non-political |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Resulted in taking them out of politics |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Origin of Civil Service Reform |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
Centralization of state administration |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Came first in municipal government |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
But afterwards in state government |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
And results in taking administrative officers out of politics |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Civil Service Reform preceded by centralization |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
Dangers of centralization |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
Obviated by taking administration out of politics |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
The Influence of the Governmental, and Particularly of the Administrative, System on the Position of the Political Party |
|
|
133 | (15) |
|
Work of party depends on form of government |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Work of party great where administration is decentralized |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Dangers of a too extended political control |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Strong parties necessary to popular government |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Effects on administrative efficiency |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
Conditions in American cities |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Advantages of strong parties |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
|
|
148 | (20) |
|
What is popular government? |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
Popular government in England |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
Responsibility of government in England |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Whose establishment was opposed |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Responsibility of government makes parties responsible in England |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
American system in theory responsible |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
American theory modified by party system |
|
|
159 | (4) |
|
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Because of the work it has to do |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
American system really not popular |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
|
|
168 | (31) |
|
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
Legislature no longer deliberates |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
Is the development of the boss natural? |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Irresponsibility of the boss |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
Boss in German system, the Crown |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Origin of English cabinet system |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
In the attempt to make Parliament subservient to the Crown |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
Resulted in development of a boss |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Walpole first English boss |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
Original opposition to the system |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Overthrow of Walpole due to it |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
Restoration of the boss system |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
Present position of the English boss |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
Due to centralization of the administration |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
And the responsibility of Parliament |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
Development of boss system not alarming |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
Boss should be made responsible |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
By making party responsible |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
Responsibility of Parties |
|
|
199 | (56) |
|
American party not responsible |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
Because of the great work it has to do |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
Which can be lessened by centralizing the administration |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
And by the adoption of the referendum |
|
|
202 | (4) |
|
Irresponsibility of party due to its legal position |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
Courts will not control it |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
But regard the action of party authorities as final |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
|
210 | (4) |
|
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
|
|
216 | (3) |
|
Some cases claim courts should exercise a control |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
Party members have insufficient protection |
|
|
220 | (2) |
|
Enrolment of party voters |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
How far subject to judicial control |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
Party membership, how determined |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
Courts will not review the count |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Nor decisions of party contests |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
Parties fall into the power of few persons |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
Official enrolment of party members |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
Party membership should be free to all |
|
|
233 | (4) |
|
Primary voting should be subject to governmental control |
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
Should take place at time of registration |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
Nomination by direct vote |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
Australian ballot should be used |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
|
244 | (6) |
|
Difference between English and American conditions |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
Relations of corporations and political parties |
|
|
251 | (3) |
|
Greater publicity necessary |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
|
|
255 | (6) |
|
Mere centralization of administration not enough |
|
|
255 | (3) |
|
Mere legal recognition of party not enough |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
Both necessary to popular government and efficient administration |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
Administration already being centralized |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
Lessons to be learned from England |
|
|
261 | |