|
Chapter 1: Introduction and problem definition |
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
1.1 Knowledge-based systems |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.4 Problems in the construction of the expertise model |
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.6 The problem definition |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.7 The research objective |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.9 Research method and outline of the thesis |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
Chapter 2: The building blocks of law |
|
|
13 | (26) |
|
2.1 The importance of structure |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
2.2 The concept of a norm |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
2.4.1 Criteria for inclusion in our classification |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Conduct and competence |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
|
19 | (7) |
|
2.5.1 Duty-imposing and permissive norms |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
2.5.2 Sein-sollen and tun-sollen norms |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2.5.3 Individual and general norms |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
2.5.4 Hypothetical and categorical norms |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
|
26 | (7) |
|
2.6.1 Power-conferring norms |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
2.6.2 Duty-imposing and permissive norms |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.6.3 Individual and general norms |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
2.6.4 Hypothetical and categorical norms |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
Chapter 3: A frame-based conceptual model of law |
|
|
39 | (34) |
|
3.1 A frame-based conceptual model |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
3.2 The norm as a scheme of interpretation |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
3.3 The elements of a norm |
|
|
41 | (15) |
|
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
|
|
44 | (6) |
|
3.3.3 The act description |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
3.3.4 The conditions of application |
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
3.3.5 The auxiliary elements |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.5 Events, processes and states of affairs |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
3.7 Acts of commission and acts of omission |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
3.10 Concept descriptions |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.11 The elements of a concept description |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
3.13 The absence of elements |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
Chapter 4: The constituent elements of the model |
|
|
73 | (36) |
|
4.1 Frames and vocabulary |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.2 Two stages: defining the constituent elements and assembling the model |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.3 Fundamental drafting principles applied |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
4.4 The Dutch Unemployment Benefits Act |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
4.4.1 The content of the Dutch Unemployment Benefits Act |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 A representative law |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
4.5 The vocabulary of the conceptual model |
|
|
78 | (11) |
|
4.5.1 Categories within the vocabulary |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 A four-step analysis of the domain |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
4.5.3 Two related issues: situations and complex predicates |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
4.5.4 The four steps applied to the Dutch Unemployment Benefits Act |
|
|
83 | (6) |
|
4.6 The generic elements of the vocabulary |
|
|
89 | (14) |
|
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
4.6.2 Textual constructions |
|
|
92 | (7) |
|
|
|
99 | (4) |
|
4.7 Norm, act and concept frames revisited |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
Chapter 5: Framing the law |
|
|
109 | (34) |
|
5.1 Assembling the model: combining frames and vocabulary |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
5.2 Restructuring the domain |
|
|
109 | (3) |
|
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 A heuristic process |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
5.3 Heuristics for assembling the model |
|
|
112 | (23) |
|
5.3.1 Heuristic 1: start at the core of a norm, act or concept description |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Heuristic 2: add as much as possible to each frame |
|
|
114 | (7) |
|
5.3.3 Heuristic 3: separate different types of norms and concepts |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
5.3.4 Heuristic 4: maintain, extract or create characteristic terms |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
5.3.5 Heuristic 5: eliminate local textual constructions |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
5.3.6 Heuristic 6: preserve global textual constructions |
|
|
130 | (3) |
|
5.3.7 Heuristic 7: merge provisions containing the same information |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
5.4 Modelling redundant information |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
5.5 Evaluating the model and assessing the heuristics |
|
|
136 | (3) |
|
5.5.1 Evaluating the model |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
5.5.2 Assessing the heuristics |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
5.6 Applicability to other domains |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
Chapter 6: Applying the model |
|
|
143 | (16) |
|
6.1 Reasoning and support for drafting |
|
|
143 | |
|
|
|
133 | (22) |
|
6.2.1 Selecting two representative tasks |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
|
|
148 | (5) |
|
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
6.3.1 Comprehensiveness of norms |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Segmentation of norms |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Chapter 7: Results and conclusions |
|
|
159 | (8) |
|
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
7.5 A solution to the interaction problem? |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
|
165 | (2) |
| References |
|
167 | (8) |
| Appendix A: The Dutch Unemployment Benefits Act (unofficial translation) |
|
175 | (4) |
| Appendix B: The vocabulary |
|
179 | (6) |
| Appendix C: A frame-based model of the DUBA |
|
185 | (20) |
| Index of names |
|
205 | (2) |
| Index of subjects |
|
207 | (4) |
| Summary |
|
211 | |
Shopping Cart
