# A Concise Introduction to Logic (with Stand Alone Rules and Argument Forms Card)

**by**Hurley, Patrick J.

11th

### 9780840034175

0840034172

Paperback

1/1/2011

Wadsworth Publishing

Complimentary 7-Day eTextbook Access

When you rent or buy this book, you will receive complimentary 7-day online access to the eTextbook version from your PC, Mac, tablet, or smartphone. Feature not included on Marketplace Items.

## Questions About This Book?

Why should I rent this book?

Renting is easy, fast, and cheap! Renting from eCampus.com can save you hundreds of dollars compared to the cost of new or used books each semester. At the end of the semester, simply ship the book back to us with a free UPS shipping label! No need to worry about selling it back.

How do rental returns work?

Returning books is as easy as possible. As your rental due date approaches, we will email you several courtesy reminders. When you are ready to return, you can print a free UPS shipping label from our website at any time. Then, just return the book to your UPS driver or any staffed UPS location. You can even use the same box we shipped it in!

What version or edition is this?

This is the 11th edition with a publication date of 1/1/2011.

What is included with this book?

- The
**Used**copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included. - The
**Rental**copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. You may receive a brand new copy, but typically, only the book itself. - The
**eBook**copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically only the book itself is included.

## Related Products

## Summary

Unsurpassed for its clarity and comprehensiveness, Hurley's A CONCISE INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC is the #1 introductory logic textbook in the market. In this Eleventh Edition, Hurley continues to build upon the tradition of a lucid, focused, and accessible presentation of the basic subject matter of logic, both formal and informal. Hurley's extensive, carefully sequenced collection of exercises continue to guide students toward greater proficiency with the skills they are learning.

## Table of Contents

Preface? | |

Informal Logic | |

Basic Concepts | |

Arguments,Premises, and Conclusions | |

Note on the History of Logic | |

Recognizing Arguments | |

Eminent Logicians | |

Simple Noninferential Passages | |

Expository Passages | |

Illustrations | |

Explanations | |

Conditional Statements | |

Summary | |

Deduction and Induction | |

Ruth Barcan Marcus | |

Deductive Argument Forms | |

Inductive Argument Forms | |

Further Considerations | |

Summary | |

Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength, Cogency | |

Deductive Arguments | |

Inductive Arguments | |

Summary | |

Eminent Logicians | |

Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity | |

Counterexample Method | |

Extended Arguments | |

Summary | |

Language: Meaning and Definition | |

Varieties of Meaning | |

The Intension and Extension of Terms | |

Definitions and Their Purposes | |

Stipulative Definitions | |

Lexical Definitions | |

Precising Definitions | |

Eminent Logicians | |

Theoretical Definitions | |

Persuasive Definitions | |

Definitional Techniques | |

Extensional (Denotative) Definitions | |

Intensional (Connotative) Definitions | |

Criteria for Lexical Definitions | |

A Lexical Definition Should Conform to the Standards of Proper Grammar | |

A Lexical Definition Should Convey the Essential Meaning of the Word Being Defined | |

A Lexical Definition Should Be Neither Too Broad nor Too Narrow | |

A Lexical Definition Should Avoid Circularity | |

A Lexical Definition Should Not Be Negative When It Can Be Affirmative | |

A Lexical Definition Should Avoid Figurative, Obscure,Vague, or Ambiguous Language | |

A Lexical Definition Should Avoid Affective Terminology | |

A Lexical Definition Should Indicate the Context to Which the Definiens Pertains | |

Summary | |

Informal Fallacies | |

Fallacies in General | |

Fallacies of Relevance | |

Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad Baculum: Appeal to the"Stick") | |

Appeal to Pity (Argumentum ad Misericordiam) | |

Appeal to the People (Argumentum ad Populum) | |

Argument Against the Person (Argumentum ad Hominem) | |

Accident | |

Straw Man | |

Missing the Point (Ignoratio Elenchi ) | |

Red Herring | |

Fallacies of Weak Induction | |

Appeal to Unqualified Authority (Argumentum ad Verecundiam) | |

Appeal to Ignorance. (Argumentum ad Ignorantiam) | |

Hasty Generalization (Converse Accident) | |

False Cause | |

Slippery Slope | |

Weak Analogy | |

Eminent logicians | |

Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Grammatical Analogy | |

Begging the Question (Petitio Principii) | |

Complex Question | |

False Dichotomy | |

Suppressed Evidence | |

Equivocation | |

Amphiboly | |

Composition | |

Division | |

Fallacies in Ordinary Language | |

Detecting Fallacies | |

Avoiding Fallacies | |

Summary | |

Formal Logic | |

Categorical Propositions | |

The Components of Categorical Propositions | |

Alice Ambrose | |

Quality, Quantity, and Distribution | |

Venn Diagrams and the Modern Square of Opposition | |

Aristotle and Boole | |

Eminent Logicians: George Boole | |

Venn Diagrams | |

The Modern Square of Opposition | |

Testing Immediate Inferences | |

Conversion, Obversion, and Contraposition | |

Conversion | |

Obversion | |

Contraposition | |

The Traditional Square of Opposition | |

Testing Immediate Inferences | |

Venn Diagrams and the Traditional Standpoint | |

Proving the Traditional Square of Opposition | |

Testing Immediate Inferences | |

Translating Ordinary Language Statements into Categorical Form | |

Terms Without Nouns | |

Nonstandard Verbs | |

Singular Propositions | |

Adverbs and Pronouns | |

Unexpressed Quantifiers | |

Nonstandard Quantifiers | |

Conditional Statements | |

Exclusive Propositions | |

"The Only" | |

Exceptive Propositions | |

Summary | |

Categorical Syllogisms | |

Standard Form, Mood, and Figure | |

Venn Diagrams | |

Eminent Logicians: John Venn | |

Boolean Standpoint | |

Aristotelian Standpoint | |

Rules and Fallacies | |

Boolean Standpoint | |

Aristotelian Standpoint | |

Proving the Rules | |

Reducing the Number of Terms | |

Saul Kripke | |

Ordinary Language Arguments | |

Enthymemes | |

Sorites | |

Summary | |

Propositional Logic | |

Symbols and Translation | |

Eminent Logicians | |

Truth Functions | |

Definitions of the Logical Operators | |

Computing the Truth Value of Longer Propositions | |

Further Comparison with Ordinary Language | |

Truth Tables for Propositions | |

Classifying Statements | |

Comparing Statements | |

Truth Tables for Arguments | |

Ada Byron, Countess of Lovelace | |

Indirect Truth Tables | |

Preliminary Skills | |

Testing Arguments for Validity | |

Testing Statements for Consistency | |

Eminent Logicians | |

Argument Forms and Fallacies | |

Common Argument Forms | |

Refuting Constructive and Destructive Dilemmas | |

Note on Invalid Forms | |

Summary and Application | |

Summary | |

Natural Deduction in Propositional Logic | |

Rules of Implication I. Exercise | |

Rules of Implication II | |

Rules of Replacement | |

WillardVan Orman Quine | |

Rules of Replacement II | |

Conditional Proof | |

Eminent Logicians | |

Indirect Proof | |

Proving Logical Truths | |

Summary | |

Predicate Logic | |

Symbols and Translation | |

Using the Rules of Inference | |

Change of Quantifier Rule | |

Eminent Logicians | |

Conditional and Indirect Proof | |

Proving Invalidity | |

Counterexample Method | |

Finite Universe Method | |

Relational Predicates and Overlapping Quantifiers | |

Translating Relational Statements | |

Using the Rules of Inference | |

Identity | |

Simple Identity Statements | |

Eminent Logicians | |

"Only," "The Only," and "No . . . Except" | |

"All Except" | |

Superlatives | |

Numerical Statements | |

Definite Descriptions | |

Using the Rules of Inference | |

Summary | |

Inductive Logic | |

Analogy and Legal and Moral Reasoning | |

Analogical Reasoning | |

Legal Reasoning | |

Moral Reasoning | |

Summary | |

Causality and Mill's Methods | |

"Cause"and Necessary and Sufficient Conditions | |

Mill's Five Methods | |

Method of Agreement | |

Method of Difference | |

Eminent Logicians | |

Joint Method of Agreement and Difference | |

Method of Residues | |

Method of Concomitant Variation | |

Mill's Methods and Science | |

Summary | |

Probability | |

Theories of Probability | |

The Probability Calculus | |

Restricted Conjunction Rule | |

General Conjunction Rule | |

Restricted Disjunction Rule | |

General Disjunction Rule | |

Negation Rule | |

Bayes's Theorem | |

Additional Applications | |

Summary | |

Statistical Reasoning | |

Evaluating Statistics | |

Samples | |

The Meaning of "Average" | |

Dispersion | |

Graphs and Pictograms | |

Percentages | |

Summary | |

Hypothetical/Scientific Reasoning | |

The Hypothetical Method | |

Hypothetical Reasoning: Four Examples from Science Radium | |

Neptune | |

Atmospheric Pressure | |

Spontaneous Generation | |

The Proof of Hypotheses | |

Eminent Logicians | |

The Tentative Acceptance of Hypotheses | |

Summary | |

Science and Superstition | |

Distinguishing Between Science and Superstition | |

Evidentiary Support | |

Objectivity | |

Integrity | |

Concluding Remarks | |

Summary | |

Appendix: Logic and Graduate-Level Admissions Tests | |

Answers to Selected Exercises | |

Glossary/Index | |

Table of Contents provided by Publisher. All Rights Reserved. |