CART

(0) items

How to Read a Paper : The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine,9781444334364

How to Read a Paper : The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine

by
Edition:
4th
ISBN13:

9781444334364

ISBN10:
1444334360
Format:
Paperback
Pub. Date:
5/24/2010
Publisher(s):
John Wiley & Sons Inc
List Price: $54.95

eTextbook


 
Duration
Price
$37.20

Rent Textbook

We're Sorry
Sold Out

Used Textbook

We're Sorry
Sold Out

New Textbook

We're Sorry
Sold Out

More New and Used
from Private Sellers
Starting at $26.14
See Prices

Customer Reviews

Very useful!  June 29, 2011
by


It is a concise and understandable textbook covering all that is important for concise critical appraisal of the literature on health and medicine. It is very interesting the section about statistics with some pearls that really have an influence in the way we consider the analysis of data in papers we are used to read. It is perfect for nursing, psychology, and allied health research courses. It is a very good start point for undergraduate and postgraduate students who want to get knowledge about this subject. This textbook arrived earlier than expected. The quality was great and the price was cheaper than I would have paid in a bookstore.






How to Read a Paper : The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine: 5 out of 5 stars based on 1 user reviews.

Summary

The book that health professionals turn to for a full and clear explanation of the principles of evidence-based medicine.

The author's descriptions of clinical research papers and how to critically appraise them are so simply presented as to be understandable by readers at all levels, from student to specialist. Chapters on searching the literature and implementing the evidence provide guidance on using evidence-based medicine in clinical practice.

This fourth edition retains the winning style, and takes in the recent developments and shifts of emphasis in evidence-based medicine and now includes:

-Thoroughly revised and updated chapters on searching, qualitative research, systematic review, and implementing evidence-based practice

-2 new chapters on quality improvement and the emerging field of complex interventions

This new edition will be welcomed by those who teach and those needing to learn the basics of evidence-based medicine.

How to Read a Paper describes the different types of clinical research reporting, and explains how to critically appraise the publications. The book provides the tools to find and evaluate the literature, and implement the findings in an evidence-based, patient-centered way. Written for anyone in the health care professions who has little or no knowledge of evidence-based medicine, it provides a clear understanding of the concepts and how to put them into practice at the basic, clinical level.

Changes for the 4th edition

The fourth edition will include two new chapters on important developments in health care research and delivery, but otherwise retains its original style, size, and scope.

-New chapter on quality improvement describing papers on quality improvement projects using ebm methods; this will extend the readership to non clinical health care professionals working in hospitals and family practice, and to nurse specialists and practice nurses working in this field

-New chapter on complex interventions - how to set up research projects involving both qualitative and quantitative methodology (known as mixed methods)

-Thorough revision and updating of existing chapters and references

-New illustrations diagrammatic representations of ebm concepts

Table of Contents

Foreword to the First Editionp. ix
Preface to the First Edition: do you need to read this book?p. xii
Preface to the Fourth Editionp. xiv
Acknowledgementsp. xvi
Why read papers at all?p. 1
Does 'evidence-based medicine' simply mean 'reading papers in medical journals'?p. 1
Why do people sometimes groan when you mention EBM?p. 3
Before you start: formulate the problemp. 9
Searching the literaturep. 15
What are you looking for?p. 16
Levels upon levels of evidencep. 18
Synthesised sources: systems, summaries and synthesesp. 19
Pre-appraised sources: synopses of systematic reviews and primary studiesp. 23
Specialised resourcesp. 23
Primary studies - tackling the junglep. 24
One-stop shopping: federated search enginesp. 28
Asking for help and asking aroundp. 28
Getting your bearings - what is this paper about?p. 31
The science of 'trashing' papersp. 31
Three preliminary question to get your bearingsp. 33
Randomised controlled trialsp. 36
Cohort studiesp. 40
Case-control studiesp. 41
Cross-sectional surveysp. 42
Case reportsp. 42
The traditional hierarchy of evidencep. 43
A note on ethical considerationsp. 44
Assessing methodological qualityp. 47
Was the study original?p. 47
Whom is the study about?p. 48
Was the design of the study sensible?p. 49
Was systematic bias avoided or minimised?p. 51
Was assessment 'blind'?p. 54
Were preliminary statistical questions addressed?p. 55
Summing upp. 58
Statistics for the non-statisticianp. 61
How can non-statisticians evaluate statistical tests?p. 61
Have the authors set the scene correctly?p. 62
Paired data, tails, and outliersp. 68
Correlation, regression and causationp. 70
Probability and confidencep. 72
The bottom linep. 74
Summaryp. 76
Papers that report trials of drug treatments and other simple interventionsp. 78
'Evidence' and marketingp. 78
Making decisions about therapyp. 80
Surrogate endpointsp. 81
What information to expect in a paper describing an RCT: the CONSORT statementp. 84
Getting worthwhile evidence out of a pharmaceutical representativep. 84
Papers that report trials of complex interventionsp. 90
Complex interventionsp. 90
Ten questions to ask about a paper describing a complex interventionp. 92
Papers that report diagnostic or screening testsp. 98
Ten men in the dockp. 98
Validating diagnostic tests against a gold standardp. 99
Ten questions to ask about a paper that claims to validate a diagnostic or screening testp. 103
Likelihood ratiosp. 108
Clinical prediction rulesp. 109
Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses)p. 113
When is a review systematic?p. 113
Evaluating systematic reviewsp. 116
Meta-analysis for the non-statisticianp. 121
Explaining heterogeneityp. 125
New approaches to systematic reviewp. 128
Papers that tell you what to do (guidelines)p. 132
The great guidelines debatep. 132
How can we help ensure that evidence-based guidelines are followed?p. 135
Ten questions to ask about a clinical guidelinep. 139
Papers that tell you what things cost (economic analyses)p. 149
What is an economic analysis?p. 149
Measuring the costs and benefits of health interventionsp. 151
Ten questions to ask about an economic analysisp. 156
Conclusionp. 160
Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)p. 163
What is qualitative research?p. 163
Evaluating papers that describe qualitative researchp. 167
Conclusionp. 174
Papers that report questionnaire researchp. 177
The rise and rise of questionnaire researchp. 177
Ten questions to ask about a paper describing a questionnaire studyp. 178
Papers that report quality improvement case studiesp. 188
What are quality improvement studies - and how should we research them?p. 188
Ten questions to ask about a paper describing a quality improvement initiativep. 190
Conclusionp. 197
Getting evidence into practicep. 199
Why are health professionals slow to adopt evidence-based practice?p. 199
How much avoidable suffering is caused by failing to implement evidence?p. 201
How can we influence health professionals' behaviour to promote evidence-based practice?p. 202
What does an 'evidence-based organisation' look like?p. 208
How can we help organisations develop the appropriate structures, systems and values to support evidence-based practice?p. 209
Why is it so hard to get evidence into policymaking?p. 214
Checklists for finding, appraising and implementing evidencep. 221
Assessing the effects of an interventionp. 230
Indexp. 231
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.


Please wait while the item is added to your cart...