More New and Used
from Private Sellers
Note: Supplemental materials are not guaranteed with Rental or Used book purchases.
The publication of Portnoy's Complaintin 1969 provoked instant, powerful reactions. It blasted Philip Roth into international fame, subjected him to unrelenting personal scrutiny and conjecture, and shocked legions of readerssome delighted, others appalled. Portnoy and other main characters became instant archetypes, and Roth himself became a touchstone for conflicting attitudes toward sexual liberation, Jewish power, political correctness, Freudian language, and bourgeois disgust. What about this book inspired Richard Lacayo of Timeto describe it as "a literary instance of shock and awe," and the Modern Library to list it among the 100 best English-language novels of the twentieth century? Bernard Avishai offers a witty exploration of Roth's satiric masterpiece, based on the prolific novelist's own writings, teaching notes, and personal interviews. In addition to discussing the book's timing, rhetorical gambit, and sheer virtuousity, Avishai includes a chapter on the Jewish community's outrage over the book and how Roth survived it, and another on the author's scorching treatment of psychoanalysis. Avishai shows that Roth's irreverent novel left us questioning who, or what, was the object of the satire. Hilariously, it proved the serious ways we construct fictions about ourselves and others.
Bernard Avishai is adjunct professor of business at Hebrew University and author of three books, most recently, The Hebrew Republic, and dozens of articles for The New Yorker, The New York Review of Books, Harper’s, Harvard Business Review, and other publications. He divides his time between Jerusalem and Wilmot, NH.
Table of Contents
|Prologue: Teaching Notes||p. 1|
|A Novel in the Form of a Confession: The Enigma of Portnoy, Who is Not Roth||p. 25|
|Really Icky: Portnoy as Satirist||p. 59|
|"The Best Kind": Portnoy as the Object of Satire||p. 91|
|Punch Line: Psychoanalysis as the Object of Satire||p. 159|
|Conclusion you are Not True||p. 199|
|Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.|