did-you-know? rent-now

Amazon no longer offers textbook rentals. We do!

did-you-know? rent-now

Amazon no longer offers textbook rentals. We do!

We're the #1 textbook rental company. Let us show you why.

9780814420171

Why Boys Fail

by
  • ISBN13:

    9780814420171

  • ISBN10:

    0814420176

  • Format: Paperback
  • Copyright: 2011-09-30
  • Publisher: Amacom Books

Note: Supplemental materials are not guaranteed with Rental or Used book purchases.

Purchase Benefits

  • Free Shipping Icon Free Shipping On Orders Over $35!
    Your order must be $35 or more to qualify for free economy shipping. Bulk sales, PO's, Marketplace items, eBooks and apparel do not qualify for this offer.
  • eCampus.com Logo Get Rewarded for Ordering Your Textbooks! Enroll Now
List Price: $15.95 Save up to $10.34
  • Rent Book $10.37
    Add to Cart Free Shipping Icon Free Shipping

    TERM
    PRICE
    DUE
    USUALLY SHIPS IN 24-48 HOURS
    *This item is part of an exclusive publisher rental program and requires an additional convenience fee. This fee will be reflected in the shopping cart.

Supplemental Materials

What is included with this book?

Summary

The signs and statistics are undeniable: Boys are falling behind in school. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the biggest culprits are not video games or pop culture. The real problem is that boys have been thrust into a bewildering new school environment that demands high-level reading and writing skills long before they are capable of handling them. Why Boys Fail takes a hard look at how this ominous reality came to be, how it has worsened in recent years, and why attempts to resolve it often devolve into finger-pointing and polarizing politics. But the book also shares some good news. Amid the alarming proof of failure among boys, there are also inspiring case studies of schools where something is going right. Each has come up with realistic ways to make sure that every student-male and female-has the tools to succeed in school and later in life. Educators and parents alike will take heart in these promising developments and heed the book's call to action-not only to demand solutions but also to help create them for their own students and children.

Author Biography

Richard Whitmire is a former editorial writer for USA Today and president of the National Educational Writers Association. A highly recognized and respected education reporter, his commentaries have been published in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The New Republic, and U.S. News World Report. He is the author of The Bee Eater: Michelle Rhee Takes on the Nation's Worst School District. He lives in Arlington, Virginia.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgmentsp. xi
Introduction to the Paperback Editionp. 1
Discovering the Problemp. 13
The Reason for the Boy Troubles: Faltering Literacy Skillsp. 27
The Likely Causes of the Reading Lapsesp. 39
The Writing Failuresp. 63
The Blame Game: What Gets Blamed (Unfairly) for the Gender Gapsp. 79
Solutions: What Works for Boys?p. 107
Impediments to a Solution: The Ideological Stalematep. 135
The International Story: Australians Struggle with the Boy Troublesp. 151
Why These Gender Gaps Matterp. 163
Actions That Need to Be Takenp. 181
Appendix: The Facts About Boysp. 211
Notesp. 217
Indexp. 229
About the Authorp. 239
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.

Supplemental Materials

What is included with this book?

The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

The Used, Rental and eBook copies of this book are not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included. This is true even if the title states it includes any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

Excerpts

<html><head></head><body><p style="margin-top: 0">Bev McClendon clearly remembers the day she discovered </p><p style="margin-top: 0">the difficulties boys were having in her elementary school. She and the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">other parents with children at Pearl Creek Elementary in Fairbanks, </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Alaska, had gathered for the spring awards ceremony. Nestled into a </p><p style="margin-top: 0">wooded hillside and surrounded by homes that overlook the Alaska Range </p><p style="margin-top: 0">to the south, Pearl Creek is a school with a dream location and a student </p><p style="margin-top: 0">body to match. With the University of Alaska as a neighbor, the school </p><p style="margin-top: 0">draws the children of professors as well as the sons and daughters of Fair </p><p style="margin-top: 0">banks's doctors and lawyers. Parents here have ambitious plans for their </p><p style="margin-top: 0">children, which makes the spring awards day a big event. This day had </p><p style="margin-top: 0">a beautiful start. The birch trees had greened up the week before and </p><p style="margin-top: 0">temperatures rose enough to hold the picnic for the sixth graders outside. </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Following the picnic about 150 parents filed into the school to sit on </p><p style="margin-top: 0">folding chairs facing a tiny elevated stage. Sitting to the side on bleachers </p><p style="margin-top: 0">were the sixth graders about to be honored. As the principal called out </p><p style="margin-top: 0">the awards, often given in clusters, the honored students climbed the stage </p><p style="margin-top: 0">to receive their awards. </p><p style="margin-top: 0">&quot;It was very visual,'' said McClendon. &quot;You would see one, two, three, </p><p style="margin-top: 0">four girls climb up to the stage and then walk off. And then another three </p><p style="margin-top: 0">or four girls would be called up. Here were all these little girls getting the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">awards.'' Of the roughly twenty awards given out, it was pretty much a </p><p style="margin-top: 0">clean sweep of academic awards for the girls that day. Wait, two boys won </p><p style="margin-top: 0">a &quot;most improved'' and a third boy got a good sense of humor/positive </p><p style="margin-top: 0">attitude award. Ouch. McClendon remembers saying to herself, &quot;Oh, </p><p style="margin-top: 0">that's horrible.'' </p><p style="margin-top: 0">It's not as if the school didn't see this coming. In the days prior to </p><p style="margin-top: 0">the awards ceremony, school counselor Annie Caulfield realized she had a </p><p style="margin-top: 0">problem. Awards that normally went to one boy and girl, such as the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">American Legion prize, were instead going to two girls. The prospect of a </p><p style="margin-top: 0">potentially embarrassing girl sweep caused Caulfield to check on past </p><p style="margin-top: 0">awards. &quot;Over the last eight years we've seen gradual changes, with more </p><p style="margin-top: 0">girls winning, and then 'bam.' This year was so blatant, so one-sided. I </p><p style="margin-top: 0">encouraged the teachers to go back and look again, but they felt this is </p><p style="margin-top: 0">what it needed to be.'' What keeps boys off awards stages is a combination </p><p style="margin-top: 0">of academics and behavior; they don't earn perfect grades and they are </p><p style="margin-top: 0">more prone to playground tussles. While those boy/girl differences have </p><p style="margin-top: 0">held for decades, something has happened in recent years to accelerate the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">problem. </p><p style="margin-top: 0">McClendon has few regrets her son didn't get an award that day. He </p><p style="margin-top: 0">gets plenty of accolades. But what about the other smart boys at Pearl </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Creek? Other parents of boys, especially those with younger boys in the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">school, appeared worried that day. &quot;I'm a staunch feminist, but my God </p><p style="margin-top: 0">look at what they're doing. You can't tell me there were no boys in that </p><p style="margin-top: 0">school who deserved an award.'' </p><p style="margin-top: 0">To avoid this situation in the future, school officials faced a dilemma: </p><p style="margin-top: 0">either they start practicing affirmative action for boys or suspend the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">awards ceremony. They chose the latter. Pushing the problem from public </p><p style="margin-top: 0">view to avoid another embarrassing clean-sweep ceremony, however, falls </p><p style="margin-top: 0">short of a long-term solution. This is not a local problem confined to Pearl </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Creek Elementary. Boys falling behind in school are both a national and </p><p style="margin-top: 0">international phenomenon involving far more than playground rough </p><p style="margin-top: 0">housing. In the United States, the problem is most obvious in high- </p><p style="margin-top: 0">poverty urban schools, where boys are losing sight of the girls. In Chicago, </p><p style="margin-top: 0">the girls at Gen. George Patton Elementary School outpaced the boys by </p><p style="margin-top: 0">fifty-five points on the 2007 state reading tests. Boys are four and a half </p><p style="margin-top: 0">times as likely as girls to get expelled from preschool and four times as </p><p style="margin-top: 0">likely to suffer from attention-deficit disorders. In state after state, boys </p><p style="margin-top: 0">are slipping behind girls in math scores on state exams, which steps on </p><p style="margin-top: 0">all the conventional wisdom about boys excelling in math, while falling </p><p style="margin-top: 0">far behind girls in reading. And while the problem is most serious in poor </p><p style="margin-top: 0">neighborhoods, the awards day snapshot offered up by the upper-income </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Pearl Creek Elementary is mirrored in middle- and upper-middle-income </p><p style="margin-top: 0">schools around the country. </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Most worrisome, boys' academic ambitions have skidded. As recently </p><p style="margin-top: 0">as 1980 more male than female high school seniors planned to graduate </p><p style="margin-top: 0">from college, federal surveys of high school seniors told us. By 2001, how </p><p style="margin-top: 0">ever, girls moved ahead of boys on that question by a startling eleven </p><p style="margin-top: 0">percentage points (updates to that survey show the gap persists). What </p><p style="margin-top: 0">happened to boys in those twenty-one years? Answering that question is </p><p style="margin-top: 0">what this book is about. Those flagging ambitions explain the dramatic </p><p style="margin-top: 0">gender imbalances unfolding on most college campuses, many of which </p><p style="margin-top: 0">hover near a 60-40 balance favoring women on graduation day. Why are </p><p style="margin-top: 0">the gender imbalances worse on graduation day? Because men are both </p><p style="margin-top: 0">less likely to enroll and more likely to drop out before earning degrees. </p><p style="margin-top: 0">The journey to find the answer to the question of why this is happen </p><p style="margin-top: 0">ing began more than a decade ago when, like every other education re </p><p style="margin-top: 0">porter at the time, I bought into the reports that schools were treating </p><p style="margin-top: 0">girls unfairly, shunting them aside in favor of aggressive boys thrusting </p><p style="margin-top: 0">their arms into the air to answer teachers' questions. As the father of two </p><p style="margin-top: 0">girls, I was outraged, and I wrote those stories uncritically. By hindsight, </p><p style="margin-top: 0">we now know that that research was flawed. I was wrong to write those </p><p style="margin-top: 0">stories. As my own daughters matured past the elementary school years, I </p><p style="margin-top: 0">began to witness just how wrong those reports were. My nephews never </p><p style="margin-top: 0">seemed to fare as well as my nieces. The brothers of our daughters' friends </p><p style="margin-top: 0">rarely did as well as their sisters. The proof was playing out in the college </p><p style="margin-top: 0">enrollment and graduation numbers, where women increasingly dominated: </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Boys, not girls, were the ones struggling in school; men, not </p><p style="margin-top: 0">women, were falling behind in college graduation numbers. And these are </p><p style="margin-top: 0">not just poor minority boys falling behind. Plenty of them come from </p><p style="margin-top: 0">schools such as Pearl Creek Elementary. </p><p style="margin-top: 0"></p><p style="margin-top: 0">* * * </p><p style="margin-top: 0"></p><p style="margin-top: 0">Thanks to a reporting fellowship at the University of Maryland, I began a </p><p style="margin-top: 0">query into this issue that would persist for many years and include the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">launching of a website/blog, whyboysfail.com. I quickly discovered that </p><p style="margin-top: 0">the boy troubles are international and that several countries, including </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Australia, are far ahead of the United States in probing the roots of the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">mystery. The journey to answer the question of why boys suddenly lose </p><p style="margin-top: 0">interest in school eventually led me to Australia, where the government </p><p style="margin-top: 0">sponsors research that schools use to buck up the boys, who, like the boys </p><p style="margin-top: 0">in the United States, lag well behind the girls. In just one year, using </p><p style="margin-top: 0">techniques such as switching to a reading program that relies more on </p><p style="margin-top: 0">phonics, breaking the curriculum into manageable &quot;chunks'' to help the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">organizationally challenged boys, introducing some single-sex classrooms, </p><p style="margin-top: 0">and arranging parent-teacher conferences well before exams rather than </p><p style="margin-top: 0">after the tests to give parents a heads up if their children were in trouble, </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Blue Mountains Grammar evened out the gender imbalances among its </p><p style="margin-top: 0">At Blue Mountains Grammar, these were not trial-and-error experi </p><p style="margin-top: 0">ments. Rather, they were based on results of a federal investigation into </p><p style="margin-top: 0">the boy problems that were released in 2003. The cause of the boy </p><p style="margin-top: 0">troubles Australian investigators settled on is relatively uncomplicated and </p><p style="margin-top: 0">mirrors the cause already identified by Britain, Canada, New Zealand, and </p><p style="margin-top: 0">other countries that have researched the issue: The world has become </p><p style="margin-top: 0">more verbal, and boys haven't. Boys lack the literacy skills to compete in </p><p style="margin-top: 0">the Information Age, a theme that will be explored in greater depth in </p><p style="margin-top: 0">later chapters. College has become the new high school, and the currencies </p><p style="margin-top: 0">of any education after high school are verbal skills and the ability to read </p><p style="margin-top: 0">critically and write clearly. That explains both the recent nature of the </p><p style="margin-top: 0">problem and its occurrence in so many countries around the world. The </p><p style="margin-top: 0">lack of literacy skills, especially the ability to write well, also helps explain </p><p style="margin-top: 0">why fewer men go to college and, once there, are less likely than women </p><p style="margin-top: 0">to earn degrees. </p><p style="margin-top: 0">The boy problems in Australia aren't any worse than the boy problems </p><p style="margin-top: 0">in the United States. They appear quite similar, as do the boy problems </p><p style="margin-top: 0">in other Western countries. What makes the United States unique is its </p><p style="margin-top: 0">relative indifference to the issue. Here, the U.S. Department of Education </p><p style="margin-top: 0">has yet to launch a single probe into the problem. No doubt, the depart </p><p style="margin-top: 0">ment is influenced by critics who say the gender gaps are just another </p><p style="margin-top: 0">manifestation of the long-standing problems of race and poverty. As a </p><p style="margin-top: 0">separate issue, the &quot;boy troubles'' are mostly a myth, they argue. It's true </p><p style="margin-top: 0">that the gender gaps are starkest in the large urban school districts. In </p><p style="margin-top: 0">July 2009 the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University </p><p style="margin-top: 0">released a study that tracked the students who graduated from Boston </p><p style="margin-top: 0">Public Schools in 2007. The conclusion: For every 167 women in four- </p><p style="margin-top: 0">year colleges there were only 100 males. Is poverty the cause? The male </p><p style="margin-top: 0">and female students came from identical homes and neighborhoods. Is </p><p style="margin-top: 0">race the issue? That's not what the study uncovered. In fact, black females </p><p style="margin-top: 0">were five percentage points more likely to pursue any further study after </p><p style="margin-top: 0">high school--community colleges, four-year colleges, or technical/ </p><p style="margin-top: 0">vocational schools--than white males. </p></body></html>

Rewards Program