Constitutional Law: 2009 Case Supplement

by Chemerinsky, Erwin

• ISBN13: 9780735582347
• ISBN10: 0735582343
• Format: Paperback
• Copyright: 2009-08-19
• Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business

Summary

To ensure that you have the most up-to-date and complete materials for your Constitutional Law class, be sure to use Constitutional Law, 2009 Case Supplement . Case coverage includes: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder Altria Group, Inc. v. Good Wyeth v. Levine Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc. District Attorney's Office For The Third Judicial District v. Osborne Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum Federal Communications Commission et al., Petitioners, v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al.

Table of Contents

Preface	p. ix
The Federal Legislative Power	p. 1
Congress's Powers Under the Post-Civil War Amendments	p. 1
What Is the Scope of Congress's Power?	p. 1
Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder	p. 1
Limits on State Regulatory and Taxing Power	p. 11
Preemption of State and Local Laws	p. 11
Express Preemption	p. 11
Altria Group, Inc. v. Good	p. 11
Implied Preemption	p. 19
Conflicts Preemption	p. 19
Wyeth v. Levine	p. 19
Fundamental Rights Under Due Process and Equal Protection	p. 29
Procedural Due Process	p. 29
What Procedures Are Required?	p. 29
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.	p. 29
District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne	p. 44
First Amendment: Freedom of Expression	p. 55
Free Speech Methodology	p. 55
The Distinction Between Content-Based and Content-Neutral Laws	p. 55
Problems in Applying the Distinction Between Content-Based and Content-Neutral Laws	p. 55
Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum	p. 55
Types of Unprotected and Less Protected Speech	p. 64
Sexually Oriented Speech	p. 64
The Broadcast Media	p. 64
Federal Communications Commisson, et al., Petitioner, v. Fox Television	p. 65
Stations, Inc., et al.	p. 65
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.