America Against the World How We Are Different and Why We Are Disliked

by Kohut, Andrew; Stokes, Bruce

• ISBN13: 9780805083057
• ISBN10: 0805083057
• Edition: Reprint
• Format: Paperback
• Copyright: 2007-05-01
• Publisher: Griffin

Summary

The rise of anti-Americanism is the most pressing challenge facing us. In America Against the World, Pew Research Center president Andrew Kohut and Bruce Stokes consider the surprising findings of Pews unprecedented survey of world opinion to understand why the world has turned against America: where once we were considered the champion of democracy, we are now seen as a militant hyperpower. The answer: Americans go-it-alone attitudes have pushed the world away. From our business endeavors abroad to the Bush administrations preemptive war policy, exceptional individualismin particular, our belief in personal responsibility and our unclouded optimismhave encouraged the world to view the United States as a bully and a threat. Former secretary of state Madeleine K. Albright argues in her foreword that we cannot stop the spread of anti-Americanism without truly understanding who we are. America Against the World provides the insights to take that step.

Author Biography

Andrew Kohut is the president of the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, the leading nonpartisan polling organization in America. Kohut is a frequent commentator for PBS and NPR and a regular essayist for The New York Times. He lives in Washington, D.C.

 

Bruce Stokes is the international economics columnist for National Journal and a consultant to the Pew Global Attitudes Project. He lives in Washington, D.C.

Table of Contents

Foreword	p. ix
Introduction: America's Image	p. xiii
America Under the Microscope	p. 1
The Rise of Anti-Americanism	p. 22
The American Way	p. 41
The Problem of American Exceptionalism	p. 68
A Blessed People	p. 91
Doing Business, Practicing Democracy	p. 120
Globalization and Americanization	p. 138
Acting Together-Or Alone	p. 162
Use of Force	p. 193
Two Americas, One American	p. 206
Conclusion: What We Are, What We Are Not	p. 220
Pew Global Attitudes Polling	p. 227
Notes	p. 229
Acknowledgments	p. 243
Index	p. 247
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.

Excerpts

Introduction: America’s Image 
IT IS FAIR to say that the Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project is the first and foremost chronicler of the rise of anti-Americanism around the world in the first decade of the twenty-first century. The findings of Pew’s surveys have brought home to Americans and their leaders the challenge the United States faces in restoring America’s image and its influence overseas. Much of the discontent that we have documented can be attributed to criticisms of U.S. policies, especially the war in Iraq. In addition, there is strong resentment and suspicion of America’s unrivaled power in the post–Cold War world, as well as concerns that globalization is unduly strengthening U.S. cultural and economic influence.
 
We originally intended to write a book that would provide readers with in-depth insights into America’s image problem, which we gained conducting 91,000 interviews in fifty nations and the Palestinian Authority from 2002 through 2005. But in the course of considering the roots and rise of anti-Americanism, we were struck by how little attention had been paid to the American public and whether it contributes to the problems people around the world have with the United States.
 
How different are American values and attitudes from those held by people in other countries? Is there an American way of thinking about things? In particular, are American values different in significant ways from those of Europeans, with whom many Americans share ancestry and who live at a comparable level of economic development? Where are the biggest attitudinal gaps between Americans and the rest of the world? Are these differences growing? How could that be in this age of globalization that some say is molding a common culture? Are some groups and regions of America—the Democratic-voting “blue states”—really closer to Europe in outlook and attitude than the rest of the country, that is, the Republican-voting “red states”?
 
And, most important, to the extent that these differences between Americans and other people exist, in what ways are they shaping the United States’ image in the new century? Are the values and attitudes of the American public fueling much of the anti-Americanism in the world?
 
These questions became even more relevant after George W. Bush’s reelection in 2004. Prior to that, overseas critics of the president found it easy to say their problem with America was really President Bush, not a considered judgment of the American people. But the results of the 2004 U.S. presidential election made that rationalization untenable. The November 4, 2004, page-one headline of the British tabloid Daily Mirror put it this way: “How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?”
 
A second question about the American character evolves out of the worldwide impact of American customs, products, and popular culture. There is so much America almost everywhere in the world: from a Starbucks inside Beijing’s Forbidden City to rap beats in the popular music of every continent on the globe, the ubiquitous popularity of the cartoon character Bart Simpson, the global notoriety of Michael Jackson, and the infiltration of American idioms and expressions into every major language in the world. What is it about American culture and products that make them so attractive, yet at the same time raise such alarm about Americanization and the spread of American power?
 
So this is a book about Americans—how their attitudes and values differ from those of other publics and the way those differences affect the world’s views of the United States. This is not a work of speculation, opinion, or theory. It relies principally on international survey data to address the issues. With international attitudes polarized on so many important matters today, such a book is timely and long overdue. But it is only now that it can be written. It is now that sufficient in-depth, multinational public opinion data has become available to approach the issues properly. The surveys are in part a beneficial by-product of globalization, which has created the capacity to do professional market research in many countries of the world.
 
At the same time, as a result of the spread of democracy, public opinion in all nations has come to play an increasingly salient role in shaping foreign policies. It is therefore of significant interest, if not concern, for the entire international community.
 
Unlike in many other parts of the world, polls and public opinion have been an integral part of American politics for decades. But it is only since the American defeat in Vietnam, which owed as much to the lack of public support at home as to events on the battlefields of Southeast Asia, that public opinion has been accorded a strong seat in foreign-policy decision-making councils. In the twenty-first century, this pattern is being extended throughout much of the world.
 
THE PEW GLOBAL ATTITUDES PROJECT
 
For this book, we rely heavily, though not exclusively, on survey data collected by the Pew Global Attitudes Project with which we have been associated from its beginnings. The project had its origins in the work of its predecessor organization, the Times Mirror Center for the People & the Press. In the summer of 1989, under the direction of Donald S. Kellermann, the newly formed center was preparing to study European public opinion in the run-up to the formation of the single European market. Within a few short months, however, the world was transformed by near cataclysmic events: the fall of the Berlin Wall, the ensuing collapse of the Soviet Union as a military power, and the demise of communism as an ideology. The Times Mirror Center survey was quickly reoriented to examine how the publics of the former Soviet empire as well as the people of Western Europe and the United States were coping with these extraordinary events.
 
Over the next two years, the Times Mirror team, including then-Professor Madeleine K. Albright, who served as an adviser on Soviet affairs, and Andrew Kohut, the survey director, conducted opinion polls and focus group interviews in seventeen nations across the breadth of Europe. The results uncovered the existing attitudes and values of the Russian, Ukrainian, and other peoples of Eastern and Central Europe. The findings anticipated difficulties in the coming transformation of their political and economic lives from communism to democracy and free-market capitalism. Released in September 1991, the results exposed the reemergence of ethnic hostilities that led to the subsequent breakup of Czechoslovakia, the huge adjustment gap between younger urban dwellers and the older and rural segments of former Soviet bloc societies, and the extent to which Russians would lag behind other peoples of the former Soviet empire in accepting democratic reforms and free-market principles.
 
Beyond the significance of its insights at the time, the project had two additional effects. First, the polling established benchmark measures of social, economic, and political values and attitudes across Europe and the United States. Second, by her own accounts, the survey’s results importantly influenced and informed the thinking of Ms. Albright, first as ambassador to the United Nations and later as secretary of state. At the end of the Clinton administration, she and Kohut agreed to team up again on an international poll, this time to study the emerging impact and likely consequences of globalization. In the summer of 2001, the Pew Charitable Trusts gave the Pew Research Center a grant to conduct the largest international public opinion survey ever undertaken, one whose principal focus was on the ways that the peoples of the world’s nations were coping with an increasingly interconnected planet where ideas, information, and products circulate and interact with extraordinary speed and ease.
 
On September 10, 2001, a Pew Global Attitudes study group, including the authors, met with Mark Malloch Brown, then administrator of the United Nations Development Program, to discuss in detail the objectives of the new survey. From an office overlooking U.N. headquarters with the New York skyline as a backdrop, we wondered aloud whether any conceivable event might radically change the world political landscape as had the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Could anything supplant globalization as the top international issue in the foreseeable future? We agreed, after brief reflection, that no such cataclysmic change was on the horizon. Of course, we could not have been more wrong.
 
Literally overnight, on September 11, the terrorist attacks on the towers of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon changed the world as dramatically as it was changed on the eve of our first international polling when the Iron Curtain rose unexpectedly. The Global Attitudes Project team immediately began to examine how to reconsider its objectives. In conjunction with the International Herald Tribune, we conducted a survey of politicians, journalists, religious leaders, scientists, and world opinion leaders. That poll helped inform the redesign of the questionnaire used in the first two years of surveys in the Pew Global Attitudes Project. It also foretold the mounting storm of concern about American power and its use in the post–September 11 war on terrorism. The opinion leaders we interviewed described the publics of their countries as sympathetic to the United States for its losses in the Al Qaeda attacks, but they also, to our surprise, signaled hidden resentments toward America. Large majorities of these individuals, for example, agreed that “it was a good thing that the Americans knew what it is like to be vulnerable.”1
 
From this, the Pew Research Center report concluded that while opinion leaders around the world saw the events of September 11 as opening a new chapter in history, many of their views about the United States and its fight against terrorism reflected a long-standing “love-hate” relationship with America. The report pointed to huge differences between U.S. opinion leaders and those in other parts of the world regarding the causes of terrorism, with influentials in most regions expressing the belief that U.S. policies were a principal cause of the September 11 attacks. And though the report found popular support for the war on terror in most regions, many thought that the United States was overreacting to the attacks.
 
While our polls of opinion leaders was prescient in many respects, a phrase in the report—“a more familiar love-hate relationship with America”—underestimated the degree of change in global public opinion that would soon develop. That relationship would not be the same “familiar” one, at least for some time into the future. Pew polls one year later, in 2002, described the slipping image of America in the world. And in 2003, following the start of the war in Iraq, Pew’s polling found even more marked deterioration in attitudes toward America in nearly every country where trend measures were available. Not only had the war inflamed the Muslim world and enlarged the rift between Americans and Western Europeans, it had intensified fears about U.S. unilateralism and, as Pew’s 2003 report observed, “significantly weakened global public support for the pillars of the post–World War II era—the U.N. and the North Atlantic alliance.”2
 
Subsequent rounds of polling in 2004 and 2005 showed little improvement in America’s image. Anti-Americanism runs deeper and is qualitatively different than in the past, when it was largely attributable to opposition to unpopular U.S. policies, such as the Vietnam War. Several factors led to this conclusion. First, America’s image had declined around the globe, not merely in Europe and among Muslim publics, where opposition to the invasion of Iraq and criticism of the Bush administration were the strongest. Second, attitudes toward the American people, in addition to the U.S. government, were adversely affected. Third, the United States was being criticized for its ideals as well as its policies. Fourth, citizens around the world feared America’s unrivaled power and opposed not only what Washington did, but also what it was capable of doing. And, possibly most troubling, this newfound anti-Americanism was proving itself to be quite robust and long-lived.
 
This book has as its principal objective to consider the difference between U.S. opinion and world opinion so as to understand global anti-Americanism. We will look deeply into how Americans and people all around the world—but especially our long-standing allies in Europe—look at democracy, the role of the individual in society, the role of government, and beliefs about business, social attitudes, and religion. In so doing, we will first revisit Alexis de Tocqueville’s observations and concerns about American exceptionalism in its earliest manifestations. We will also compare and contrast the views of Americans with those of other publics on contemporary world issues, such as globalization, unilateralism, and the use of military force, which estrange the United States and Americans from other countries and peoples.
 
Finally, it is not our purpose to indict or exonerate public opinion. Our purpose is to clarify the extent to which Americans are different and consider how much that really matters. While the Pew Global Attitudes Project is not the first attempt to use survey research to test the premises of American exceptionalism, it is the largest in scope among efforts that provide statistical comparisons between the United States and the rest of the world. America Against the World describes what we found, along with what we have learned from our colleagues at the World Values Project, the Gallup Organization, the German Marshall Fund, and others.
 
Copyright © 2006 by The Pew Research Center

---

Excerpted from America Against the World: How We Are Different and Why We Are Disliked by Andrew Kohut, Bruce Stokes
All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.