More New and Used
from Private Sellers
Attacking Faulty Reasoning : Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments
by Damer, T. EdwardEdition:
5th
ISBN13:
9780534605162
ISBN10:
0534605168
Format:
Paperback
Pub. Date:
2/26/2004
Publisher(s):
Wadsworth Publishing
List Price: $80.00
Rent Textbook
(Recommended)Term
Due
Price
Short Term
Aug 2
$11.86
Semester
Oct 1
$40.00
Quarter
Aug 22
$36.00
$11.86
Buy Used Textbook
In Stock Usually Ships in 24 Hours.
$1.00
Buy New Textbook
In Stock Usually Ships in 24 Hours.
$6.38
eTextbook
We're Sorry
Not Available
Questions About This Book?
Why should I rent this book?
Renting is easy, fast, and cheap! Renting from eCampus.com can save you hundreds of dollars compared to the cost of new or used books each semester. At the end of the semester, simply ship the book back to us with a free UPS shipping label! No need to worry about selling it back.
How do rental returns work?
Returning books is as easy as possible. As your rental due date approaches, we will email you several courtesy reminders. When you are ready to return, you can print a free UPS shipping label from our website at any time. Then, just return the book to your UPS driver or any staffed UPS location. You can even use the same box we shipped it in!
What version or edition is this?
This is the 5th edition with a publication date of 2/26/2004.
What is included with this book?
- The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any CDs, lab manuals, study guides, etc.
- The Used copy of this book is not guaranteed to inclue any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included.
- The Rental copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. You may receive a brand new copy, but typically, only the book itself.
Related Products
Summary
Improve your skills in rational, argumentative discussion with ATTACKING FAULTY REASONING: PRACTICAL GUIDE TO FALLACY-FREE ARGUMENTS! Addressing over 60 fallacies and featuring a wealth of examples and exercises, this philosophy text will help you identify fallacies and craft well-formed arguments.
Table of Contents
| Introduction | p. 1 |
| Reasons for Using Good Arguments | p. 1 |
| Goals of the Text | p. 2 |
| A Code of Intellectual Conduct | p. 4 |
| An Effective Procedural Standard | p. 4 |
| An Important Ethical Standard | p. 4 |
| A Code of Conduct for Effective Discussion | p. 5 |
| The Fallibility Principle | p. 5 |
| The Truth-Seeking Principle | p. 5 |
| The Clarity Principle | p. 5 |
| The Burden of Proof Principle | p. 5 |
| The Principle of Charity | p. 5 |
| The Structural Principle | p. 6 |
| The Relevance Principle | p. 6 |
| The Acceptability Principle | p. 6 |
| The Sufficiency Principle | p. 6 |
| The Rebuttal Principle | p. 6 |
| The Resolution Principle | p. 6 |
| The Suspension of Judgment Principle | p. 6 |
| The Reconsideration Principle | p. 7 |
| The Fallibility Principle | p. 7 |
| The Truth-Seeking Principle | p. 8 |
| The Clarity Principle | p. 9 |
| Assignments | p. 10 |
| What is an Argument? | p. 11 |
| An Argument Is a Claim Supported by Other Claims | p. 11 |
| Distinguishing Argument from Opinion | p. 12 |
| The Burden of Proof Principle | p. 12 |
| The Standard Form of an Argument | p. 14 |
| The Principle of Charity | p. 16 |
| Deductive Versus Inductive Strength of Arguments | p. 17 |
| Moral Arguments Have a Moral Premise | p. 19 |
| Making the Moral Premise Explicit | p. 21 |
| Assignments | p. 22 |
| What is a Good Argument? | p. 23 |
| A Good Argument Must Meet Five Criteria | p. 23 |
| The Structural Principle | p. 23 |
| The Relevance Principle | p. 25 |
| The Acceptability Principle | p. 26 |
| Criteria of Acceptability | p. 27 |
| Conditions of Unacceptability | p. 28 |
| The Sufficiency Principle | p. 29 |
| The Rebuttal Principle | p. 30 |
| Making Arguments Stronger | p. 32 |
| Applying the Criteria to Arguments | p. 33 |
| The Resolution Principle | p. 39 |
| The Suspension of Judgment Principle | p. 40 |
| The Reconsideration Principle | p. 41 |
| Assignments | p. 41 |
| What is a Fallacy? | p. 43 |
| A Fallacy Is a Violation of a Criterion of a Good Argument | p. 43 |
| Named Versus Unnamed Fallacies | p. 44 |
| Organization of the Fallacies | p. 45 |
| Attacking the Fallacy | p. 47 |
| Rules of the Game | p. 50 |
| Assignments | p. 51 |
| Fallacies That Violate the Structural Criterion | p. 52 |
| Begging-the-Question Fallacies | p. 53 |
| Arguing in a Circle | p. 53 |
| Question-Begging Language | p. 55 |
| Complex Question | p. 57 |
| Question-Begging Definition | p. 59 |
| Assignments | p. 61 |
| Fallacies of Inconsistency | p. 61 |
| Incompatible Premises | p. 62 |
| Contradiction Between Premise and Conclusion | p. 64 |
| Assignments | p. 65 |
| Fallacies of Deductive Inference | p. 66 |
| Denying the Antecedent | p. 66 |
| Affirming the Consequent | p. 68 |
| False Conversion | p. 69 |
| Undistributed Middle Term | p. 71 |
| Illicit Distribution of an End Term | p. 73 |
| Assignments | p. 75 |
| Fallacies that Violate the Relevance Criterion | p. 78 |
| Fallacies of Irrelevance | p. 78 |
| Irrelevant Authority | p. 79 |
| Appeal to Common Opinion | p. 81 |
| Genetic Fallacy | p. 83 |
| Rationalization | p. 84 |
| Drawing the Wrong Conclusion | p. 86 |
| Using the Wrong Reasons | p. 88 |
| Assignments | p. 91 |
| Irrelevant Emotional Appeals | p. 92 |
| Appeal to Force or Threat | p. 92 |
| Appeal to Tradition | p. 93 |
| Appeal to Self-Interest | p. 95 |
| Playing to the Gallery | p. 97 |
| Assignments | p. 101 |
| Fallacies that Violate the Acceptability Criterion | p. 104 |
| Fallacies of Linguistic Confusion | p. 104 |
| Equivocation | p. 105 |
| Ambiguity | p. 107 |
| Misleading Accent | p. 109 |
| Illicit Contrast | p. 111 |
| Argument by Innuendo | p. 113 |
| Misuse of a Vague Expression | p. 115 |
| Distinction Without a Difference | p. 117 |
| Assignments | p. 118 |
| Unwarranted Assumption Fallacies | p. 119 |
| Fallacy of the Continuum | p. 120 |
| Fallacy of Composition | p. 123 |
| Fallacy of Division | p. 124 |
| False Alternatives | p. 126 |
| Is-Ought Fallacy | p. 127 |
| Wishful Thinking | p. 129 |
| Misuse of a Principle | p. 130 |
| Fallacy of the Mean | p. 132 |
| Faulty Analogy | p. 134 |
| Assignments | p. 136 |
| Fallacies that Violate the Sufficiency Criterion | p. 141 |
| Fallacies of Missing Evidence | p. 141 |
| Insufficient Sample | p. 142 |
| Unrepresentative Data | p. 144 |
| Arguing from Ignorance | p. 146 |
| Contrary-to-Fact Hypothesis | p. 148 |
| Fallacy of Popular Wisdom | p. 150 |
| Special Pleading | p. 152 |
| Omission of Key Evidence | p. 154 |
| Assignments | p. 155 |
| Causal Fallacies | p. 156 |
| Confusion of a Necessary with a Sufficient Condition | p. 156 |
| Causal Oversimplification | p. 158 |
| Post Hoc Fallacy | p. 160 |
| Confusion of Cause and Effect | p. 161 |
| Neglect of a Common Cause | p. 163 |
| Domino Fallacy | p. 164 |
| Gambler's Fallacy | p. 166 |
| Assignments | p. 168 |
| Fallacies that Violate the Rebuttal Criterion | p. 171 |
| Fallacies of Counterevidence | p. 171 |
| Denying the Counterevidence | p. 172 |
| Ignoring the Counterevidence | p. 173 |
| Assignments | p. 176 |
| Ad Hominem Fallacies | p. 176 |
| Abusive Ad Hominem | p. 176 |
| Poisoning the Well | p. 178 |
| Two-Wrongs Fallacy | p. 180 |
| Assignments | p. 182 |
| Fallacies of Diversion | p. 182 |
| Attacking a Straw Man | p. 183 |
| Trivial Objections | p. 185 |
| Red Herring | p. 186 |
| Resort to Humor or Ridicule | p. 188 |
| Assignments | p. 190 |
| Writing the Argumentative Essay | p. 194 |
| Researching the Question | p. 194 |
| Stating Your Position | p. 195 |
| Arguing for Your Position | p. 196 |
| Rebutting Objections to Your Position | p. 197 |
| Resolving the Question | p. 197 |
| Sample Argumentative Essay | p. 198 |
| Assignments | p. 205 |
| Letter to Jim | p. 206 |
| Glossary of Fallacies | p. 210 |
| Answers to Selected Assignments | p. 215 |
| Index | p. 223 |
| Table of Contents provided by Rittenhouse. All Rights Reserved. |
CART












