More New and Used
from Private Sellers
Questions About This Book?
Why should I rent this book?
Renting is easy, fast, and cheap! Renting from eCampus.com can save you hundreds of dollars compared to the cost of new or used books each semester. At the end of the semester, simply ship the book back to us with a free UPS shipping label! No need to worry about selling it back.
How do rental returns work?
Returning books is as easy as possible. As your rental due date approaches, we will email you several courtesy reminders. When you are ready to return, you can print a free UPS shipping label from our website at any time. Then, just return the book to your UPS driver or any staffed UPS location. You can even use the same box we shipped it in!
What version or edition is this?
This is the 3rd edition with a publication date of 11/5/2010.
What is included with this book?
- The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any CDs, lab manuals, study guides, etc.
- The Used copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included.
- The Rental copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. You may receive a brand new copy, but typically, only the book itself.
This brand new edition of Death Penalty Cases makes the most manageable comprehensive resource on the death penalty even better. It includes the most recent cases, including Kennedy v. Louisiana, prohibiting the death penalty for child rapists, and Baze v. Rees, upholding execution by lethal injection. In addition, all of the cases are now topically organized into five sections: * The Foundational Cases * Death-Eligibility: Which persons/crimes are fit for the death penalty? * The Death Penalty Trial * Post-conviction Review * Execution Issues The introductory essays on the history, administration, and controversies surrounding capital punishment have been thoroughly revised. The statistical appendix has been brought up-to-date, and the statutory appendix has been restructured. For clarity, accuracy, complete impartiality and comprehensiveness, there simply is no better resource on capital punishment available.* Provides the most recent case material--no need to supplement. * Topical organization of cases provides a more logical organization for structuring a course. * Co-authors with different perspectives on the death penalty assures complete impartiality of the material. * Provides the necessary historical background, a clear explanation of the current capital case process, and an impartial description of the controversies surrounding the death penalty * Provides the latest statistics relevant to discussions on the death penalty. * Clearly explains the different ways in which the states process death penalty cases, with excerpts of the most relevant statutes.
Barry Latzer, JD, PhD, is a professor of criminal justice at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City. David McCord, JD, is a professor of law at Drake University Law School in Des Moines, Iowa.
Table of Contents
|Table of Cases||p. xi|
|Capital Punishment in America||p. 1|
|Cruel and Unusual as Applied-Furman v. Georgia (1972)||p. 37|
|Not Inherently Unconstitutional-Gregg v. Georgia (1976)||p. 67|
|Mandatory Death Penalty-Woodson v. North Carolina (1976)||p. 85|
|Mitigating Evidence-Lockett v. Ohio (1978) and Jurek v. Texas (1976)||p. 99|
|Racial Bias-McCleskey v. Kemp (1987)||p. 113|
|Death-Eligible Crimes and Persons|
|Rape and Other Nonhomicide Crimes-Coker v. Georgia (1977)||p. 135|
|Murder-Godfrey v. Georgia (1980)||p. 145|
|Felony-Murder-Enmund v. Florida (1982) and Tison v. Arizona (1987)||p. 155|
|The Mentally Retarded and Juveniles-Atkins v. Virginia (2002) and Roper v. Simmons (2005)||p. 181|
|Child Rape-Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008)||p. 215|
|The Death Penalty Trial|
|Appropriate Decision Makers-Spaziano v. Florida (1984) and Ring v. Arizona (2002)||p. 235|
|Selecting Jurors-Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968), Turner v. Murray (1986), and Uttecht v. Brown (2007)||p. 253|
|Victim Impact Evidence-Payne v. Tennessee (1991)||p. 275|
|The Sentencing Decision-McKoy v. North Carolina(1990) and Kansas v. Marsh||p. 295|
|Ineffective Counsel-Strickland v. Washington (1984) and Williams v. Taylor (2000)||p. 317|
|Claims of Innocence-Herrera v. Collins (1993) and Kansas v. Marsh||p. 337|
|Insane Convicts May Not Be Executed-Ford v. Wainwright (1986) and Panetti v. Quarterman (2007)||p. 373|
|Method of Execution-Baze v. Rees (2008)||p. 387|
|Facts and Figures on Murder and the Death Penalty||p. 411|
|Understanding Statutory Provisions||p. 427|
|Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.|