More New and Used
from Private Sellers
Questions About This Book?
Why should I rent this book?
Renting is easy, fast, and cheap! Renting from eCampus.com can save you hundreds of dollars compared to the cost of new or used books each semester. At the end of the semester, simply ship the book back to us with a free UPS shipping label! No need to worry about selling it back.
How do rental returns work?
Returning books is as easy as possible. As your rental due date approaches, we will email you several courtesy reminders. When you are ready to return, you can print a free UPS shipping label from our website at any time. Then, just return the book to your UPS driver or any staffed UPS location. You can even use the same box we shipped it in!
What version or edition is this?
This is the 13th edition with a publication date of 3/4/2009.
What is included with this book?
- The Used copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included.
TAKING SIDES: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES, 13/e EXPANDEDpresents current controversial issues in a debate-style format designed to stimulate student interest and develop critical thinking skills. Each issue is thoughtfully framed with an issue summary, an issue introduction, and a postscript. An instructor�s manual with testing material is available for each volume. USING TAKING SIDES IN THE CLASSROOM is also an excellent instructor resource with practical suggestions on incorporating this effective approach in the classroom. Each TAKING SIDES reader features an annotated listing of selected World Wide Web sites and is supported by a book website. Visitwww.mhcls.com..
Table of Contents
|Correlation Guide||p. xv|
|Environmental Philosophy||p. 1|
|Is the Precautionary Principle a Sound Approach to Risk Analysis?||p. 2|
|Yes: from "The Rise of the Precautionary Principle: A Social Movement Gathers Strength," Multinational Monitor (September 2004)||p. 4|
|No: from "The Precautionary Principle: Is It a Threat to Toxicological Science?" International Journal of Toxicology (January/February 2006)||p. 13|
|Is Sustainable Development Compatible with Human Welfare?||p. 22|
|Yes: from "The European Dream: Building Sustainable Development in a Globally Connected World," E Magazine (March/April 2005)||p. 24|
|No: from "Wilting Greens," Reason (December 2002)||p. 32|
|Should a Price Be Put on the Goods and Services Provided by the World's Ecosystems?||p. 37|
|Yes: from "The Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects," BioScience (April 2006)||p. 39|
|No: from "Pricing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: The Never-Ending Story," BioScience (April 2000)||p. 51|
|Principles Versus Politics||p. 63|
|Should the Endangered Species Act Be Strengthened?||p. 64|
|Yes: from "Testimony before the Oversight Hearing on the Endangered Species Act," U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (May 19, 2005)||p. 66|
|No: from "Testimony before the Oversight Hearing on the Endangered Species Act," U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (May 19, 2005)||p. 74|
|Should the EPA Be Doing More to Fight Environmental Injustice?||p. 81|
|Yes: from "Environmental Justice Programs," Statement before the Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health, Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (July 25, 2007)||p. 83|
|No: from "Environmental Justice Programs," Statement before the Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health, Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (July 25, 2007)||p. 89|
|Can Pollution Rights Trading Effectively Control Environmental Problems?||p. 96|
|Yes: from "Carbon Trading," Electric Perspectives (September/October 2005)||p. 98|
|No: from "Trading Away the Earth: Pollution Credits and the Perils of 'Free Market Environmentalism,'" Dollars & Sense (March/April 1996)||p. 106|
|Energy Issues||p. 117|
|Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Be Opened to Oil Drilling?||p. 118|
|Yes: from "To Drill or Not to Drill," The Independent Review (Fall 2001)||p. 120|
|No: from Senate Energy Committee (October 24, 2005)||p. 129|
|Is Global Warming Skepticism Just Smoke and Mirrors?||p. 136|
|Yes: from "Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to Manufacture Uncertainty on Climate Science," Union of Concerned Scientists (January 2007)||p. 138|
|No: from "Liberal 'Scientists' Lead Jihad against Global-Warming Skeptics," Human Events (May 8, 2007)||p. 156|
|Is Wind Power Green?||p. 166|
|Yes: from "Whither Wind?" Orion (September/October 2006)||p. 168|
|No: from "The Wayward Wind?," speech given in the township of Perry, near Silver Lake, Wyoming County, New York (June 19, 2006)||p. 177|
|Should Cars Be More Efficient?||p. 190|
|Yes: from "CAFE Standards," Testimony before Committee on Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation (March 6, 2007)||p. 192|
|No: from "Why the Government's CAFE Standards for Fuel Efficiency Should Be Repealed, Not Increased," The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder (July 11, 2001)||p. 200|
|Do Biofuels Enhance Energy Security?||p. 205|
|Yes: from "Testimony before Committee on Senate Energy and Natural Resources" (April 12, 2007)||p. 207|
|No: from "Biofuels-Facts and Fiction," The Ecologist (March 2007)||p. 213|
|Is It Time to Revive Nuclear Power?||p. 220|
|Yes: from "Testimony before the United States Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources, Hearing on the Department of Energy's Nuclear Power 2010 Program" (April 26, 2005)||p. 222|
|No: from "Brave Nuclear World, Part II" World Watch (July/August 2006)||p. 229|
|Food and Population||p. 243|
|Do Falling Birthrates Pose a Threat to Human Welfare?||p. 244|
|Yes: from "Birth Dearth," Newsweek (September 27, 2004)||p. 246|
|No: from "The Fewer the Better," New Statesman (November 8, 2004)||p. 252|
|Is Genetic Engineering the Answer to Hunger?||p. 258|
|Yes: from "Is Genetic Engineering the Answer to Hunger?" America (February 21, 2005)||p. 260|
|No: from "Genetic Engineering Is Not the Answer," America (May 2, 2005)||p. 264|
|Is a Large-Scale Shift to Organic Farming the Best Way to Increase World Food Supply?||p. 270|
|Yes: from "Can Organic Farming Feed Us All?" World Watch (May/June 2006)||p. 272|
|No: from "The Organic Myth: A Food Movement Makes a Pest of Itself," National Review (February 9, 2004)||p. 281|
|Toxic Chemicals||p. 289|
|Should DDT Be Banned Worldwide?||p. 290|
|Yes: from "Malaria, Mosquitoes, and DDT," World Watch (May/June 2002)||p. 292|
|No: from "Statement before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, Hearing on the Role of Science in Environmental Policy-Making" (September 28, 2005)||p. 300|
|Do Environmental Hormone Mimics Pose a Potentially Serious Health Threat?||p. 311|
|Yes: from "The Hazards of Environmental Estrogens," The World & I (October 2001)||p. 313|
|No: from "Endocrine Disrupters, Politics, Pesticides, the Cost of Food and Health," Daily Commentary (December 15, 1997)||p. 319|
|Is the Superfund Program Successfully Protecting Human Health from Hazardous Materials?||p. 328|
|Yes: from "Superfund Matures Gracefully," Issues in Science & Technology (Summer 2003)||p. 330|
|No: from "Not in Their Backyard," Mother Jones (May/June 2007)||p. 334|
|Should the United States Reprocess Spent Nuclear Fuel?||p. 343|
|Yes: from "Statement before the House Committee on Science, Energy Subcommittee, Hearing on Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing," United States Senate (June 16, 2005)||p. 345|
|No: from "The Case against a Near-Term Decision to Reprocess Spent Nuclear Fuel in the United States," United States Senate (June 16, 2005)||p. 352|
|Is Carbon Capture Technology Ready to Limit Carbon Emissions?||p. 362|
|Yes: from "Carbon Capture and Sequestration," Testimony before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality (March 6, 2007)||p. 364|
|No: from "Carbon Capture & Storage: Blue-Sky Technology or Just Blowing Smoke?" Environmental Health Perspectives (November 2007)||p. 375|
|Should North America's Landscape Be Restored to Its Pre-Human State?||p. 385|
|Yes: from "Restoring America's Big, Wild Animals," Scientific American (June 2007)||p. 387|
|No: from "Pleistocene Park: Does Re-Wilding North America Represent Sound Conservation for the 21st Century?" Biological Conservation (vol. 132, 2006)||p. 393|
|Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.|