Anyone Who Has a View

by Van Eemeren, Frans H.; Blair, J. Anthony; Willard, Chales A.; Henkemans, A. Francisca Snoeck

• ISBN13: 9781402014550
• ISBN10: 1402014554
• Format: Hardcover
• Copyright: 2003-12-01
• Publisher: Kluwer Law Intl

Summary

This volume contains a selection of papers (keynote addresses and other important papers) from the International Conference on Argumentation at Amsterdam of 2002 by prominent international scholars of argumentation theory. The contributions are representative of the main approaches to the study of argumentation: the informal logical approach, the logical approach, the dialectical approach, the rhetorical and the communicative approach. Taken together the papers in this volume provide an insightful cross-section of the current state of affairs in argumentation research. The collection of essays as a whole will be of interest to all those working in the field of argumentation theory and to all scholars who are interested in recent developments in this field.

Table of Contents

PREFACE	1	(122)
1. REASONS	3	(14)
Robert C. Pinto
2. THE PRAGMATIC DIMENSION OF PREMISE ACCEPTABILITY	17	(10)
James B. Freeman
3. RATIONALITY AND JUDGMENT	27	(14)
Harvey Siegel
4. THE DIALECTICAL TIER REVISITED	41	(14)
Ralph H. Johnson
5. THE RABBIT IN THE HAT: THE INTERNAL RELATIONS OF THE PRAGMA-DIALECTICAL RULES	55	(14)
Hans Vilhelm Hansen
6. TOULMIN'S WARRANTS	69	(14)
David Hitchcock
7. METADIALOGUES	83	(8)
Erik C.W. Krabbe
8. RELATIONSHIPS AMONG LOGIC, DIALECTIC AND RHETORIC	91	(18)
J. Anthony Blair
9. LOGICAL FALLACIES, DIALECTICAL TRANSGRESSIONS, RHETORICAL SINS, AND OTHER FAILURES OF RATIONALITY IN ARGUMENTATION	109	(14)
Daniel H. Cohen
10. A PRAGMATIC VIEW OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF	123	(10)
Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser
11. THE ORDINARY PRACTICE OF PRESUMING AND PRESUMPTION WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO VERACITY AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF	133	(14)
Fred J. Kauffeld
12. TWO CONCEPTIONS OF OPENNESS IN ARGUMENTATION THEORY	147	(10)
Scott Jacobs
13. MULTIDIMENSIONALITY AND NON-DEDUCTIVENESS IN DELIBERATIVE ARGUMENTATION	157	(16)
Christian Kock
14. ARGUMENTATION STUDIES IN FRANCE: A NEW LEGITIMACY	173	(16)
Christian Plantin
15. DISCOURSE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN ARGUMENTATIVE AND GRAMMATICAL SEQUENCES	189	(6)
Sorin Stati
16. DIAGRAMMING, ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES AND CRITICAL QUESTIONS	195	(18)
Douglas Walton and Chris Reed
17. LEGAL ARGUMENTATION THEORY AND THE CONCEPT OF LAW	213	(14)
Stefano Bertea
18. ARGUERS' OBLIGATIONS: ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE	227	(10)
Joseph W. Wenzel
19. CHARLES S. PEIRCE'S THEORY OF ABDUCTION AND THE ARISTOTELIAN ENTHYMEME FROM SIGNS	237	(18)
Manfred Kraus
20. RHETORIC AND DIALECTIC IN MARTIN LUTHER KING'S 'LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL'	255	(14)
Michael Leff
21. ON THE ARGUMENTATIVE QUALITY OF EXPLANATORY NARRATIVES	269	(14)
Tone Kvernbekk
22. THE WILES OF ARGUMENT: PROTODELIBERATION AND HEROIC PRUDENCE IN HOMER'S 'ODYSSEY'	283	(14)
G. Thomas Goodnight
23. FELICITY CONDITIONS FOR THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL AD HOMINEM: THE CASE OF 'BUSH V. GORE'	297	(12)
David Zarefsky
24. THE POTENTIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN NORMATIVELY-GOOD ARGUMENTATIVE PRACTICE AND PERSUASIVE SUCCESS: EVIDENCE FROM PERSUASION EFFECTS RESEARCH	309	(10)
Daniel J. O' Keefe
25. THE CONCEPT OF ARGUMENT QUALITY IN THE ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL: A NORMATIVE AND EMPIRICAL APPROACH TO PETTY AND CACIOPPO'S 'STRONG' AND 'WEAK' ARGUMENTS	319	(18)
Renske yan Enschot-van Dijk, Lettica Hustinx and Hans Hoeken
26. HOW NARRATIVE ARGUMENTATION WORKS: AN ANALYSIS OF ARGUMENTATION AIMED AT RECONSIDERING GOALS	337	(10)
Lenore Langsdorf
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS	347