rent-now

Rent More, Save More! Use code: ECRENTAL

5% off 1 book, 7% off 2 books, 10% off 3+ books

9780521723749

Argumentation Schemes

by
  • ISBN13:

    9780521723749

  • ISBN10:

    0521723744

  • Edition: 1st
  • Format: Paperback
  • Copyright: 2008-08-04
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Note: Supplemental materials are not guaranteed with Rental or Used book purchases.

Purchase Benefits

  • Free Shipping Icon Free Shipping On Orders Over $35!
    Your order must be $35 or more to qualify for free economy shipping. Bulk sales, PO's, Marketplace items, eBooks and apparel do not qualify for this offer.
  • eCampus.com Logo Get Rewarded for Ordering Your Textbooks! Enroll Now
List Price: $42.99 Save up to $12.36
  • Rent Book $30.63
    Add to Cart Free Shipping Icon Free Shipping

    TERM
    PRICE
    DUE
    SPECIAL ORDER: 1-2 WEEKS
    *This item is part of an exclusive publisher rental program and requires an additional convenience fee. This fee will be reflected in the shopping cart.

How To: Textbook Rental

Looking to rent a book? Rent Argumentation Schemes [ISBN: 9780521723749] for the semester, quarter, and short term or search our site for other textbooks by Douglas Walton , Christopher Reed , Fabrizio Macagno. Renting a textbook can save you up to 90% from the cost of buying.

Summary

This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from the elementary exposition in the first chapter to the latest state of the art in the research efforts to formalize and classify the schemes, outlined in the last chapter. It provides a systematic and comprehensive account, with notation suitable for computational applications that increasingly make use of argumentation schemes.

Author Biography

Douglas Walton is Distinguished Research Fellow of CRRAR (Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric), University of Windsor, and Assumption University Chair in Argumentation Studies (University of Windsor) Chris Reed is senior lecturer and head of research at the School of Computing, University of Dundee. He is the head of the Argumentation Research Group at Dundee, which has been instrumental in the development of the Argument Interchange Format, an international standard for computational work in the area Fabrizio Macagno received his doctorate in linguistics from the Catholic University of Milan. He is coauthor with Douglas Walton of several papers published in international journals

Table of Contents

Acknowledgmentsp. xi
Introductionp. 1
Basic Tools in the State of the Artp. 7
Introducing Argumentation Schemesp. 8
Argument from Position to Know and Expert Opinionp. 13
Critical Questionsp. 15
Enthymemes, Schemes, and Critical Questionsp. 18
Argument Diagramming Toolsp. 21
Introducing Araucariap. 24
Problems to be Solvedp. 30
How Are Schemes Binding?p. 34
Directions for AIp. 38
Where We Go from Herep. 40
Schemes for Argument from Analogy, Classification, and Precedentp. 43
The Case of the Drug-Sniffing Dogp. 45
Argument from Analogy as Treated in Logic Textbooksp. 48
Is Argument from Analogy Deductive or Inductive?p. 53
The Schemes for Argument from Analogyp. 55
Argument from Analogy as a Defeasible Form of Argumentp. 60
Arguments from Classificationp. 66
Arguments Based on Rules and Classificationsp. 70
Argument from Precedent and Practical Argument from Analogyp. 72
The Case of the Drug-Sniffing Dog Againp. 75
Conclusionsp. 80
Knowledge-Related, Practical, and Other Schemesp. 87
Arguments from Knowledgep. 87
Practical Reasoningp. 94
Lack-of-Knowledge Argumentsp. 98
Arguments from Consequencesp. 100
Fear and Danger Appealsp. 102
Arguments from Alternatives and Oppositesp. 106
Pleas for Help and Excusesp. 108
Composition and Division Argumentsp. 112
Slippery Slope Argumentsp. 114
Attacking Verbal Classification and Slippery Slope Argumentsp. 117
Arguments from Generally Accepted Opinions, Commitment, and Characterp. 121
Arguments from Popular Opinionp. 122
Variants of the Basic Formp. 124
Argument from Commitmentp. 132
Arguments from Inconsistencyp. 136
Ethotic Argumentsp. 140
Circumstantial Ad Hominemp. 147
Argument from Biasp. 154
Ad Hominem Strategies to Rebut a Personal Attackp. 160
Causal Argumentation Schemesp. 163
The Problem of Causationp. 164
Argument from Cause to Effectp. 168
Argument from Effect to Causep. 169
Argument from Correlation to Causep. 173
Cases in Pointp. 175
Causal Argumentation at Stages of an Investigationp. 178
Causal Assertions as Defeasiblep. 181
Toward a System of Analysis and Classificationp. 184
Dialectical and Bayesian Models of Causal Argumentationp. 186
Schemes and Enthymemesp. 189
Introductionp. 190
Preliminary Discussion of the Problemp. 191
A Deductive Casep. 194
Limitations of Deductive Analysisp. 196
Use of Argumentation Schemes in Analysisp. 199
Use of Schemes in Analyzing Weak Argumentsp. 202
Limitations of Schemesp. 206
Discussion of Casesp. 210
The Attribution Problemp. 213
The Dialectical Component of the Enthymeme Machinep. 216
Attack, Rebuttal, and Refutationp. 220
Attacking, Questioning, Rebutting, and Refutingp. 221
Older Theories of Refutationp. 230
Newer Theories of Refutationp. 238
Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questionsp. 243
Toward a Pragmatic Theory of Refutationp. 247
Different Kinds of Oppositionp. 251
Internal and External Refutationp. 259
A Case Study of Combined Rebuttalsp. 263
The Problem of Argument from Oppositesp. 267
Problems about Critical Questions and Refutationsp. 271
The History of Schemesp. 275
Aristotle on the Topicsp. 276
Cicerop. 282
Boethiusp. 284
From Abelard to the Thirteenth Centuryp. 289
Fourteenth-Century Logicp. 294
Topics in the Renaissance and the Port Royal Logicp. 296
Modern Theories of Schemesp. 300
Conclusionsp. 304
A User's Compendium of Schemesp. 308
Argument from Position to Knowp. 309
Argument from Expert Opinionp. 310
Argument from Witness Testimonyp. 310
Argument from Popular Opinion (and Subtypes)p. 311
Argument from Popular Practicep. 314
Argument from Examplep. 314
Argument from Analogyp. 315
Practical Reasoning from Analogyp. 316
Argument from Compositionp. 316
Argument from Divisionp. 317
Argument from Oppositionsp. 317
Rhetorical Argument from Oppositionsp. 318
Argument from Alternativesp. 318
Argument from Verbal Classificationp. 319
Argument from Definition to Verbal Classificationp. 319
Argument from Vagueness of a Verbal Classificationp. 320
Argument from Arbitrariness of a Verbal Classificationp. 320
Argument from Interaction of Act and Personp. 321
Argument from Valuesp. 321
Argument from Sacrificep. 322
Argument from the Group and Its Membersp. 322
Practical Reasoningp. 323
Two-Person Practical Reasoningp. 325
Argument from Wastep. 326
Argument from Sunk Costsp. 326
Argument from Ignorancep. 327
Epistemic Argument from Ignorancep. 328
Argument from Cause to Effectp. 328
Argument from Correlation to Causep. 328
Argument from Signp. 329
Abductive Argumentation Schemep. 329
Argument from Evidence to a Hypothesisp. 331
Argument from Consequencesp. 332
Pragmatiic Argument from Alternativesp. 333
Argument from Threatp. 333
Argument from Fear Appealp. 333
Argument from Danger Appealp. 334
Argument from Need for Helpp. 334
Argument from Distressp. 334
Argument from Commitmentp. 335
Ethotic Argumentp. 336
Generic Ad Hominemp. 336
Pragmatic Inconsistencyp. 336
Argument from Inconsistent Commitmentp. 337
Circumstantial Ad Hominemp. 337
Argument from Biasp. 338
Bias Ad Hominemp. 338
Argument from Gradualismp. 339
Slippery Slope Argumentp. 339
Precedent Slippery Slope Argumentp. 340
Sorites Slippery Slope Argumentp. 340
Verbal Slippery Slope Argumentp. 341
Full Slippery Slope Argumentp. 341
Argument for Constitutive-Rule Claimsp. 342
Argument from Rulesp. 343
Argument for an Exceptional Casep. 344
Argument from Precedentp. 344
Argument from Plea for Excusep. 345
Argument from Perceptionp. 345
Argument from Memoryp. 346
Refining the Classification of Schemesp. 347
A Proposed General System for Classification of Schemesp. 348
Classification of Ad Hominem Schemesp. 351
Classifying the Subtypes of Ad Hominem Argumentsp. 357
Complicationsp. 360
Conclusionsp. 362
Formalizing Schemesp. 364
The Defeasible Modus Ponens Form of Schemesp. 364
Schemes in AMLp. 367
Elements of a Formalization of Schemesp. 369
Formalization of Schemes in the Carneades Systemp. 371
Formally Modeling the Critical Questionsp. 373
The Argument Interchange Formatp. 375
The Research Project for Developing a Formal Systemp. 378
Schemes in Dialoguep. 382
Summary of the Dialectical System ASDp. 388
A Worked Example of a Dialogue in ASDp. 389
Conclusionsp. 392
Schemes in Computer Systemsp. 393
Schemes in Araucariap. 393
Schemes in ArguMedp. 397
Schemes in Compendiump. 400
Schemes in Rationalep. 400
Schemes in Natural Language Argumentationp. 405
Schemes in Interagent Communicationp. 408
Schemes in Automated Reasoningp. 411
Schemes in Computational Applicationsp. 412
Conclusionsp. 414
Bibliographyp. 417
Indexp. 431
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.

Supplemental Materials

What is included with this book?

The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

The Used, Rental and eBook copies of this book are not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included. This is true even if the title states it includes any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

Rewards Program