The Best American Short Stories 2005

by Chabon, Michael

• ISBN13: 9780618423491
• ISBN10: 0618423494
• Format: Hardcover
• Copyright: 2005-10-05
• Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

Summary

The Best American Series First, Best, and Best-Selling The Best American series has been the premier annual showcase for the country's finest short fiction and nonfiction since 1915. Each volume's series editor selects notable works from hundreds of periodicals. A special guest editor, a leading writer in the field, then chooses the very best twenty or so pieces to publish. This unique system has made the Best American series the most respected -- and most popular -- of its kind. The Best American Short Stories 2005 includes Dennis Lehane bull; Tom Perrotta bull; Alice Munro bull; Edward P. Jones bull; Joy Williams bull; Joyce Carol Oates bull; Thomas McGuane bull; Kelly Link bull; Charles D'Ambrosio bull; Cory Doctorow bull; George Saunders bull; and others Michael Chabon, guest editor, is the best-selling author of The Mysteries of Pittsburgh, Wonder Boys, A Model World, and, most recently, The Final Solution. His novel The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay won the Pulitzer Prize in 2000.

Table of Contents

Foreword	p. ix
Introduction	p. xiii
The Smile on Happy Chang's Face: from Post Road	p. 1
Until Gwen: from The Atlantic Monthly	p. 19
A Taste of Dust: from Ninth Letter	p. 35
Old Friends: from The New Yorker	p. 43
Eight Pieces for the Left Hand: from Granta	p. 58
Stone Animals: from Conjunctions	p. 67
First Four Measures: from The Paris Review	p. 109
The Scheme of Things: from The New Yorker	p. 125
Silence: from The New Yorker	p. 149
Death Defier: from Virginia Quarterly Review	p. 174
The Girls: from Idaho Review	p. 212
Anda's Game: from Salon.com	p. 223
Simple Exercises for the Beginning Student: from Swink	p. 251
Old Boys, Old Girls: from The New Yorker	p. 265
The Secret Goldfish: from The New Yorker	p. 288
The Cousins: from Harper's Magazine	p. 298
Natasha: from Harper's Magazine	p. 318
Hart and Boot: from Polyphony	p. 339
Justice Shiva Ram Murthy: from Harvard Review	p. 356
Bohemians: from The New Yorker	p. 374
Contributors' Notes	p. 383
100 Other Distinguished Stories of 2004	p. 394
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.

Excerpts

Introduction Entertainment has a bad name. Serious people, some of whom write short stories, learn to mistrust and even to revile it. The word wears spandex, pasties, a leisure suit studded with blinking lights. It gives off a whiff of Coppertone and dripping Creamsicle, the fake-butter miasma of a movie- house lobby, of karaoke and Jagermeister, Jerry Bruckheimer movies, a Street Fighter machine grunting solipsistically in the corner of an ice-rink arcade, bread and circuses, the Weekly World News. Entertainment trades in cliche and product placement. It sells action figures and denture adhesive. It engages regions of the brain far from the centers of discernment, critical thinking, ontological speculation. It skirts the black heart of life and drowns life's lambency in a halogen glare. Intelligent people must keep a certain distance from its productions. They must handle the things that entertain them with gloves of irony and postmodern tongs. Entertainment, in short, means junk, and too much junk is bad for you - bad for your heart, your arteries, your mind, your soul. But maybe these intelligent and serious people, my faithful straw men, are wrong. Maybe the reason for the junkiness of so much of what pretends to entertain us is that we have accepted - indeed, we have helped to articulate - such a narrow, debased concept of entertainment. The brain is an organ of entertainment, sensitive at any depth and over a wide spectrum. But we have learned to mistrust and despise our human aptitude for being entertained, and in that sense we get the entertainment we deserve. I'd like to believe that, because I read for entertainment, and I write to entertain. Period. Oh, I could decoct a brew of other, more impressive motivations and explanations. I could uncork some stuff about reader response theory, or the Lacanian parole. I could go on - God knows I've done it elsewhere - about the storytelling impulse and the need to make sense of experience through story. A spritz of Jung might scent the air. I could adduce Kafka's formula, as the brilliant Lorrie Moore did in this space last year, of a book as an axe for the frozen sea within. I could go down to the cafe at the local mega-bookstore and take some wise words of Abelard or Koestler, about the power of literature, off a mug. But in the end - here's my point - it would still all boil down to entertainment, and its suave henchman, pleasure. Because when the axe bites the ice, you feel an answering throb of delight all the way from your hands to your shoulders, and the blade tolls like a bell for miles. Therefore I would like to propose expanding our definition of entertainment to encompass everything pleasurable that arises from the encounter of an attentive mind with a page of literature. In so doing I will only be codifying what has, all my life, been my operating definition. Here is a sample, chosen at random from my career as a reader, of encounters that would be covered under my new definition of entertainment: the engagement of the interior ear by the rhythm and pitch of an original prose style; the dawning awareness that giant mutant rat people dwell in the walls of a ruined abbey in England; two hours spent bushwhacking through a densely packed argument about the structures of power as embodied in nineteenth-century prison architecture; the consummation of a great love aboard a lost Amazonian riverboat or in Elizabethan slang; the intricate fractal patterning of motif and metaphor in Nabokov and Neil Gaiman; stories of pirates, zeppelins, sinister children; a thousand-word-long sentence comparing homosexuals to the Jews in a page of Proust; a duel to the death with broad