did-you-know? rent-now

Amazon no longer offers textbook rentals. We do!

did-you-know? rent-now

Amazon no longer offers textbook rentals. We do!

We're the #1 textbook rental company. Let us show you why.

9780735550148

Constitutional Law

by
  • ISBN13:

    9780735550148

  • ISBN10:

    073555014X

  • Edition: 5th
  • Format: Hardcover
  • Copyright: 2005-03-01
  • Publisher: Wolters Kluwer
  • Purchase Benefits
  • Free Shipping Icon Free Shipping On Orders Over $35!
    Your order must be $35 or more to qualify for free economy shipping. Bulk sales, PO's, Marketplace items, eBooks and apparel do not qualify for this offer.
  • eCampus.com Logo Get Rewarded for Ordering Your Textbooks! Enroll Now
List Price: $149.00

Summary

The new edition of this best-selling constitutional law casebook offers a variety of critical and social perspectives, drawing not only on traditional doctrinal materials, but also on materials from political theory, philosophy, history, ethics, economics, and more. Long held in high regard For The quality of its scholarship, Constitutional Law responds to a broad range of current constitutional issues in its Fifth Edition. Longtime users will recognize these distinctive characteristics of the casebook: multi-disciplinary approach that utilizes a variety of critical and social perspectives to explore constitutional law a contemporary examination of Constitutional Law within a traditional doctrinal structure extensive textual summaries of the state of the law and its development logical two-part organization: first, the balance of powers among the Supreme Court and local, state, and federal governments, then the rights and powers of individuals comprehensive book ideal for a two-semester course supplemented annually, with First Amendment materials separated from the other coverage for ease of research clear and concise coverage of First Amendment law, especially valuable for law schools that do not have a separate course in the area Changes For The Fifth Edition reflect recent developments and class experience: issues of constitutional obligation and constitutionalism in times of crisis incorporated into the opening chapter reorganization of materials on the powers of Congress, with the materials on "other powers of congress" separated into a new Chapter 3 completely updated chapter on the Distribution of National Powers, with new material growing out of the war on terrorism and its implications for free speech, immigration, naturalization, privacy, and due process, As well as enemy combatant controversies notes are shortened, simplified, and thoroughly updated without diminishing depth of coverage Please visit the new companion website to learn more about this book. Website: http://www.aspenlawschool.com/stone_constitutionallaw5

Table of Contents

Preface xxxiii
Acknowledgments xxxv
Editorial Notice xli
The Constitution of the United States xliii
Biographical Notes on Selected U.S. Supreme Court Justices lxi
The Supreme Court since 1789 lxxxi
The Role of the Supreme Court in the Constitutional Order
1(162)
Introduction: Creating a Constitution That Binds the Future
1(7)
Note: The Textual Constitution's Role in Binding the Future
2(6)
The Origins of the U.S. Constitution
8(21)
The Arguments over the New Constitution
12(2)
The Federalist No. 10 (Madison)
14(4)
Note: Madisonian Republicanism
18(3)
The Federalist No. 51 (Madison)
21(3)
Note: Madisonian Republicanism and Checks and Balances
24(2)
Note: Madisonian Republicanism and Contemporary Constitutionalism
26(3)
The Basic Framework
29(32)
Marbury v. Madison
29(7)
Note: Marbury v. Madison
36(6)
Note: Constitutions, Democracy, and Judicial Review
42(9)
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
51(4)
Note: Supreme Court Review of State Courts and State Laws
55(2)
Note: Judicial Exclusivity in Constitutional Interpretation?
57(4)
The Sources of Judicial Decisions: Text, ``Representation-Reinforcement,'' and Natural Law
61(16)
McCulloch v. Maryland
61(9)
Note: Constitutional Methodology and Constitutional Interpretation in McCulloch
70(4)
Calder v. Bull
74(1)
Note: Natural Law, Moral Argument, and the Supreme Court
75(2)
The Power of Political Control over the Supreme Court
77(12)
Note: Amendment, Appointment, Impeachment, and the Election Returns
77(6)
Ex parte McCardle
83(1)
Note: Political Control over Jurisdiction of Article III Courts
84(5)
Note: The Power of Reprisal---General Thoughts
89(1)
``Case or Controversy'' Requirements and the Passive Virtues
89(70)
Advisory Opinions
91(1)
Standing
92(1)
Allen v. Wright
92(5)
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
97(8)
Note: The ``Law'' of Standing
105(13)
Note: Prudential Standing
118(1)
Political Questions
119(1)
Baker v. Carr
119(5)
Note: The Bases for Finding a Political Question
124(12)
Note: The Development of Standards for Reviewing Political Fairness
136(1)
Vieth v. Jubelirer
137(7)
Bush v. Gore
144(8)
Note: Political Questions and Partisan Issues
152(6)
Questions of Timing---Ripeness and Mootness
158(1)
The Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
159(4)
Note: Jurisdiction, Certiorari, and the U.S. Supreme Court
159(4)
Federalism at Work: Congress and the National Economy
163(116)
The Values of Federalism and Some Techniques for Implementing Them
163(7)
Note: A Government of Enumerated Powers
163(2)
Note: The Values of Federalism
165(4)
Note: A Comparative Perspective---U.S. Federalism as a Model?
169(1)
Doctrinal Fundamentals: Federalism and Judicial Review
170(15)
Gibbons v. Ogden
170(2)
Note: Gibbons v. Ogden
172(1)
Hammer v. Dagenhart (The Child Labor Case)
173(2)
Wickard v. Filburn
175(2)
Note: Political Constraints versus Judicial Enforcement
177(8)
The Evolution of Commerce Clause Doctrine: The Lessons (?) of History
185(44)
United States v. E. C. Knight Co.
187(1)
Houston, East & West Texas Railway v. United States (The Shreveport Rate Cases)
188(1)
Note: Direct, Indirect, and Stream of Commerce Tests
188(2)
Champion v. Ames (The Lottery Case)
190(1)
Note: Prohibiting Interstate Transportation---Proper Regulation or Improper Pretext?
191(1)
Note: The New Deal Crisis
192(1)
A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
193(2)
Carter v. Carter Coal Co.
195(3)
Note: New Deal Legislation and Commerce Clause Tests in the 1930s
198(2)
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
200(4)
United States v. Darby
204(2)
Note: The New Deal Legacy
206(2)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States
208(1)
Katzenbach v. McClung
209(1)
Note: Federalism and Congressional Motivation
210(1)
United States v. Lopez
211(11)
United States v. Morrison
222(2)
Note: Federalism after the New Deal
224(4)
Note: Observations on Court-Imposed Limitations on Congress's Powers
228(1)
State Regulation of Interstate Commerce
229(50)
The Fundamental Framework
229(1)
Note: The Classical View
229(2)
Note: The Modern View
231(4)
Protection against Discrimination
235(1)
Note: General Considerations
235(1)
City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey
236(2)
Note: Facial/Intentional Discrimination
238(2)
C & A Carbone, Inc. v. Clarkstown
240(5)
Note: Geographic Discrimination
245(2)
West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy
247(2)
Note: The Alternative of Subsidies
249(1)
Note: Other Doctrines Concerning Discrimination
250(4)
Note: Concluding Observations
254(1)
Facially Neutral Statutes with Significant Effects on Interstate Commerce
254(2)
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
256(2)
Note: Inferring Intent from Effect
258(1)
Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland
259(4)
Note: Facially Neutral Statutes with (Merely?) Disproportionate Effects for Commercial or Social Purposes
263(2)
Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.
265(6)
Note: Facially Neutral Statutes with (Merely?) Disproportionate Effects for Police Power Purposes
271(2)
Note: Taxation of Interstate Commerce
273(2)
Note: Preemption
275(2)
Note: Concluding Observations
277(2)
The Scope of Congress's Powers: Taxing and Spending, War Powers, Individual Rights, and State Autonomy
279(78)
Regulation through Taxing, Spending, and the War Power
280(19)
The Taxing Power
280(3)
The Spending Power
283(1)
United States v. Butler
283(5)
Note: The Spending Power and Dual Federalism
288(1)
Steward Machine Co. v. Davis
288(3)
Note: Conditional Spending, Coercion, and the Political Process
291(5)
The ``War'' Power
296(3)
Congress's Enforcement Power under the Reconstruction Amendments
299(31)
Note: Possible Interpretations of the Section 5 Power
299(2)
Katzenbach v. Morgan
301(2)
Note: The Scope of Section 5
303(3)
City of Boerne v. Flores
306(3)
Note: The Roles of Court and Congress
309(1)
Note: The Interaction of Congressional Enforcement Power and the Eleventh Amendment
310(2)
Board of Trustees v. Garrett
312(6)
Note: Congressional Power to Abrogate States' Sovereign Immunity
318(9)
Note: Congressional Power to Regulate ``Private'' Action for Civil Rights Purposes
327(3)
The Tenth Amendment as a Federalism-Based Limitation On Congressional Power
330(27)
Missouri v. Holland
330(2)
Note: Federalism and the Treaty Power
332(1)
Note: The Modern Revival of Tenth Amendment-Based Restraints on Federal Regulation of State and Local Governments
333(1)
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
334(2)
Note: From Garcia to New York v. United States
336(1)
New York v. United States
337(11)
Printz v. United States
348(3)
Note: The ``Anticommandeering'' Principle
351(5)
Note: Concluding Observations on Congress's Powers
356(1)
The Distribution of National Powers
357(90)
Introduction
357(4)
The Federalist No. 47 (Madison)
357(1)
The Federalist No. 48 (Madison)
358(1)
Note: The Theory of Separation and Checks and Balances
358(2)
Note: A Comparative Perspective
360(1)
A Case Study: Presidential Seizure
361(14)
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (The Steel Seizure Case)
361(9)
Note: Youngstown and the Power of the President
370(2)
Dames & Moore v. Regan
372(3)
Note: Iranian Claims and Executive Power
375(1)
Foreign Affairs
375(30)
Executive Authority
376(1)
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.
376(2)
Note: The President and Foreign Affairs
378(1)
Note: The Allocation of Warmaking Authority
378(5)
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
383(11)
Note: Unanswered Questions
394(4)
Legislative Authority
398(1)
The War Powers Resolution
399(2)
Note: The War Powers Resolution
401(2)
Note: Congressional Control over Agreements with Foreign States---Treaties, Executive Agreements, and Congressional-Executive Agreements
403(2)
Domestic Affairs
405(42)
Executive Authority
405(1)
United States v. Nixon
405(5)
Note: Executive Privilege and Presidential Immunity
410(3)
Note: The Politics of Impeachment
413(1)
Note: The ``Law'' of Impeachment
414(3)
Legislative Authority
417(1)
Note: The Nondelegation Doctrine and ``Quasi-Constitutional'' Statutes
418(5)
INS v. Chadha
423(6)
Note: The Legislative Veto
429(1)
Note: Where Do Administrative Agencies ``Fit'' in the Separation of Powers Scheme?
429(4)
Bowsher v. Synar
433(2)
Morrison v. Olson
435(7)
Note: Congressional Control over Administrative Officials
442(3)
Note: Distribution of National Powers---Final Thoughts
445(2)
Equality and the Constitution
447(270)
Race, The Constitution, and Changing Conceptions of Equality
447(54)
Slavery and the Constitution
448(2)
State v. Post
450(2)
Note: The Constitutionality of Slavery
452(1)
Dred Scott v. Sandford
453(3)
Note: Dred Scott and the Power of Judicial Review
456(1)
Reconstruction and Retreat
457(1)
Note: The Work of the Reconstruction Congress
458(2)
Note: The Judicial Reaction
460(4)
Plessy v. Ferguson
464(3)
Note: Separate but Equal
467(2)
The Attack on Jim Crow
469(1)
Note: The NAACP's Legal Strategy
470(1)
Note: The Road to Brown
471(2)
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (Brown I)
473(2)
Note: Justifications and Explanations for Brown
475(6)
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (Brown II)
481(1)
Note: ``All Deliberate Speed''
482(1)
Fulfilling Brown's Promise
483(1)
Note: The Initial Response to Brown
483(5)
Note: School Desegregation Moves North
488(2)
The End of an Era
490(1)
Note: Modern Limits on the Duty to Desegregate
490(7)
Note: Final Thoughts on School Desegregation and the Efficacy of Judicial Review
497(4)
Equal Protection Methodology: Rational Basis Review
501(22)
New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer
502(2)
Note: Equal Treatment and Relevant Differences
504(3)
Note: Limitations on Permissible Government Purposes
507(1)
U.S. Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
507(1)
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center
508(1)
Romer v. Evans
509(3)
Note: ``Actual Purpose'' Review
512(1)
Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
512(4)
Note: The Means-Ends Nexus
516(3)
Railway Express Agency v. New York
519(1)
Williamson v. Lee Optical
520(3)
Equal Protection Methodology: Heightened Scrutiny and the Problem of Race
523(99)
The Origins and Rationale for Heightened Scrutiny in Race-Specific Classifications That Disadvantage Racial Minorities
524(1)
Strauder v. West Virginia
524(1)
Korematsu v. United States
525(4)
Loving v. Virginia
529(2)
Note: Doctrinal Evolution in the Scrutiny Applied to Racial Classifications
531(2)
Note: Justifications for Strict Scrutiny of Racial Classifications
533(9)
Note: The Structure of Strict Scrutiny
542(2)
Note: The Neutrality of Facial Classifications?
544(1)
Hunter v. Erickson
545(1)
Facially Nonracial Classifications that Disadvantage Racial Minorities: When Does Heightened Scrutiny Apply?
546(1)
Washington v. Davis
546(3)
Note: Rational Basis Review of Non-Race-Specific Classifications
549(1)
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
550(3)
Rogers v. Lodge
553(5)
Note: What Constitutes a Racially Motivated Classification?: Questions of Discriminatory Purpose
558(9)
Note: Distinctive Problems in the Administration of Criminal Justice
567(2)
McCleskey v. Kemp
569(4)
Note: Racial Disparities in Investigating, Charging, and Sentencing
573(3)
Race-Specific Classifications that Benefit Racial Minorities
576(1)
Note: The Imposition of Strict Scrutiny
576(5)
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena
581(8)
Note: The Constitutionality of ``Benign'' Racial Classifications
589(5)
Grutter v. Bollinger
594(12)
Note: The Contemporary Application of Strict Scrutiny
606(2)
Gratz v. Bollinger
608(3)
Note: The ``Special'' Case of Indigenous People
611(1)
Rice v. Cayetano
612(1)
Note: A Comparative Perspective
613(2)
Note: The Special Problem of Facially Neutral but Race-Specific Voting Districts
615(7)
Equal Protection Methodology: Heightened Scrutiny and the Problem of Gender
622(44)
The Early Cases
622(1)
The Road to Intermediate Scrutiny
623(1)
Reed v. Reed
624(1)
Frontiero v. Richardson
624(2)
Note: From Reed to Craig v. Boren---Evolution and Doctrinal Confusion
626(3)
Craig v. Boren
629(5)
Note: Heightened Scrutiny for Gender Classifications?
634(5)
Archaic and Overbroad Generalizations versus ``Real'' Differences
639(1)
United States v. Virginia
640(7)
Note: ``Real Differences'' and Formal Equality
647(3)
Nguyen v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
650(4)
Note: The Relevance of ``Real Differences''
654(4)
Califano v. Goldfarb
658(3)
Califano v. Webster
661(1)
Note: The Problem of ``Benign'' Gender Classifications
662(3)
The Irrelevant Constitution?
665(1)
Note: The Current Relevance of Constitutional Law
665(1)
Equal Protection Methodology: The Problem of Sexual Orientation
666(23)
Note: The Nature of the Class at Issue
666(3)
Romer v. Evans
669(9)
Note: The Meaning of Romer
678(1)
Note: More Targeted Laws Discriminating on the Basis of Sexual Orientation
679(6)
Note: Strict Scrutiny for Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation?
685(4)
Equal Protection Methodology: Other Candidates for Heightened Scrutiny
689(28)
Alienage
689(1)
Sugarman v. Dougall
690(3)
Note: Strict Scrutiny for Classifications Based on Alienage---Defining the Political Community
693(4)
Note: Alienage and Federal Preemption
697(3)
Wealth Classifications
700(1)
Note: Uncertain Protection for the Poor
701(4)
Note: Wealth Discrimination and the Problem of Affirmative Rights
705(5)
Other Disadvantaged Groups
710(1)
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center
710(2)
Note: Evaluating the Claims of Other Disadvantaged Groups
712(5)
Implied Fundamental Rights
717(332)
Introduction
717(7)
Note: Theories of Constitutional Interpretation---``Originalism'' and Its Critics
717(7)
The Privileges or Immunities Clause
724(10)
The Slaughter-House Cases
725(5)
Note: The Demise of the Privileges or Immunities Clause
730(4)
The Incorporation Controversy
734(7)
Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore
734(1)
Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.
735(1)
Twining v. New Jersey
735(1)
Palko v. Connecticut
736(1)
Adamson v. California
737(1)
Note: The Black/Frankfurter Debate
738(1)
Duncan v. Louisiana
739(1)
Note: Incorporation since Duncan
740(1)
Substantive Due Process: The Protection of Economic Interests and the Question of Redistribution
741(27)
Note: The Road to Lochner
742(3)
Lochner v. New York
745(5)
Note: The (Alleged?) Vices of Lochner
750(5)
Note: The Lochner Era, 1905--1934
755(2)
Nebbia v. New York
757(2)
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
759(1)
Note: The Context of West Coast Hotel and the 1930s Political and Economic Climate
760(1)
Note: The End of an Era
761(1)
United States v. Carolene Products Co.
762(2)
Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma
764(1)
Ferguson v. Skrupa
764(1)
Note: Pluralism, Naked Wealth Transfers, and the Courts
765(3)
Fundamental Interests and the Equal Protection Clause
768(77)
Skinner v. Oklahoma
769(3)
Note: The Fundamental ``Right to Have Offspring''
772(1)
Voting
773(1)
Denial of the ``Right to Vote''
773(1)
Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections
774(1)
Note: Is the Right to Vote ``Fundamental''?
775(3)
Kramer v. Union Free School District
778(1)
Note: Kramer and Its Progeny
779(2)
Dilution of the ``Right to Vote''
781(1)
Reynolds v. Sims
782(4)
Note: Reynolds and Its Progeny
786(4)
City of Mobile v. Bolden
790(4)
Note: Vote Dilution and the Interests of Groups
794(4)
Davis v. Bandemer
798(4)
Denial of ``Access to the Ballot''
802(1)
Williams v. Rhodes
802(1)
Note: Williams and Its Progeny
803(3)
Access to the Judicial Process
806(1)
Griffin v. Illinois
806(1)
Douglas v. California
807(1)
Note: Fundamental Interests and the Criminal Justice System
808(3)
Boddie v. Connecticut
811(1)
Note: Access to the Judicial Process in Civil Cases
812(3)
Travel
815(1)
Shapiro v. Thompson
815(4)
Saenz v. Roe
819(1)
Note: The Right to Travel as a ``Fundamental Interest''
820(1)
Note: ``Penalizing'' the Right to Travel
821(5)
Welfare
826(1)
Dandridge v. Williams
826(1)
Note: Dandridge and the Judicial Role in the Welfare Context
827(3)
Education
830(1)
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
830(7)
Note: The Rodriguez Formulation
837(1)
Plyler v. Doe
838(5)
Note: Plyler and the Equal Protection Clause
843(2)
Modern Substantive Due Process: Privacy, Personhood, and Family
845(122)
The Right of Privacy
845(1)
Griswold v. Connecticut
845(8)
Note: Griswold and the Right of Privacy
853(4)
Abortion
857(1)
Roe v. Wade
857(6)
Note: The Abortion Decision
863(6)
Maher v. Roe
869(3)
Harris v. McRae
872(1)
Note: The Abortion-Funding Cases
873(2)
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.
875(2)
Note: Regulating Abortion
877(3)
Note: The Webster Case
880(1)
Note: Abortion after Webster
881(3)
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
884(19)
Note: Casey and the Role of the Court
903(1)
Stenberg v. Carhart
904(13)
Family and Other ``Privacy'' Interests
917(1)
Moore v. City of East Cleveland
917(1)
Note: Family and Association
918(2)
Zablocki v. Redhail
920(3)
Note: Families, Marriage, and Tradition
923(6)
Note: The Limits of Privacy
929(1)
Bowers v. Hardwick
930(5)
Lawrence v. Texas
935(13)
Note: Homosexuality, Sexual Liberty, and Substantive Due Process
948(2)
The Right to Die
950(1)
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
950(5)
Note: The Right to Die
955(2)
Washington v. Glucksberg
957(8)
Note: Assisted Suicide
965(2)
Procedural Due Process
967(21)
Liberty and Property Interests
967(1)
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
968(1)
Perry v. Sindermann
969(1)
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill
970(2)
Note: Defining ``Liberty'' and ``Property''
972(2)
Note: Statutory Entitlements and Natural Liberty
974(3)
What Process Is Due
977(1)
Mathews v. Eldridge
977(4)
Note: Balancing Tests and the Due Process Clause
981(5)
Note: The (Dead) Irrebuttable Presumption Doctrine
986(2)
Note: Procedural Due Process and ``Legislative'' Determinations
988(1)
The Contracts and Takings Clauses
988(61)
The Contracts Clause
989(1)
Note: Early Interpretive Problems
989(3)
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
992(4)
Note: Market Ordering and Constitutional Interpretation
996(2)
United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey
998(1)
Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus
999(2)
Note: United States Trust, Spannaus, and the Nonrevival of the Contracts Clause
1001(3)
The Eminent Domain Clause
1004(1)
Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff
1004(2)
Note: The Public Use Requirement and the Takings Clause
1006(1)
Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon
1007(3)
Miller v. Schoene
1010(1)
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City
1011(5)
Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v. DeBenedictis
1016(2)
Note: ``Takings'' and the Police Power
1018(3)
Note: Penn Central, Keystone, Takings, and Related Problems
1021(4)
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
1025(2)
Note: Nollan, Unconstitutional Condition's and Other Problems
1027(4)
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
1031(7)
Note: Lucas, the Environment, and Regulatory Takings
1038(2)
Palazzolo v. Rhode Island
1040(7)
Note: Palazzolo---Final Thoughts
1047(2)
Freedom of Expression
1049(436)
Introduction
1049(12)
Note: The History of Free Expression
1049(5)
Note: The Philosophy of Free Expression
1054(6)
Note: Organization
1060(1)
Content-Based Restrictions: Dangerous Ideas and Information
1061(81)
Speech That ``Causes'' Unlawful Conduct
1061(1)
Shaffer v. United States
1062(1)
Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten
1063(2)
Schenck v. United States
1065(1)
Note: Shaffer, Masses, and Schenck
1066(3)
Frohwerk v. United States
1069(1)
Debs v. United States
1070(1)
Abrams v. United States
1070(3)
Note: Abrams and the Emergence of the Holmes-Brandeis Tradition
1073(2)
Gitlow v. New York
1075(3)
Note: ``Abstract Doctrine'' versus ``Urging to Action''
1078(1)
Whitney v. California
1079(3)
Note: The Brandeis Concurrence and the Road to Dennis
1082(2)
Dennis v. United States
1084(4)
Note: Dennis and the Communist ``Conspiracy''
1088(3)
Note: The Road to Brandenburg
1091(3)
Brandenburg v. Ohio
1094(2)
Note: The Brandenburg Formulation
1096(3)
Note: Abridgment of Speech Other than by Direct Criminal Prohibition
1099(5)
Speech That ``Threatens''
1104(1)
Bridges v. California
1104(1)
Watts v. United States
1105(1)
Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists
1106(2)
Speech That Provokes a Hostile Audience Reaction
1108(1)
Terminiello v. Chicago
1108(1)
Cantwell v. Connecticut
1109(1)
Feiner v. New York
1110(3)
Note: Cantwell, Feiner, and the Search for Mechanisms of Control
1113(1)
Note: Revising the Feiner Approach
1114(3)
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
1117(2)
Note: Fighting Words
1119(3)
Note: The Skokie Controversy
1122(3)
Speech That Discloses Confidential Information
1125(1)
Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia
1125(1)
Note: Landmark and the Problem of Confidentiality
1125(1)
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart
1126(2)
New York Times Co. v. United States; United States v. Washington Post Co.
1128(7)
Note: Nebraska Press, the Pentagon Papers, and Snepp
1135(4)
Note: The Progressive Controversy
1139(2)
Note: Terrorism and the First Amendment
1141(1)
Note: Dangerous Ideas and Information---Final Thoughts
1142(1)
Overbreadth, Vagueness, and Prior Restraint
1142(21)
Overbreadth and Vagueness
1143(1)
Gooding v. Wilson
1143(3)
Note: Overbreadth
1146(4)
Note: Vagueness
1150(1)
Prior Restraint
1151(1)
Lovell v. Griffin
1152(1)
Note: Licensing as Prior Restraint
1153(4)
Near v. Minnesota
1157(2)
Note: Injunction as Prior Restraint
1159(4)
Content-Based Restrictions: ``Low'' Value Speech
1163(128)
False Statements of Fact
1164(1)
New York Times v. Sullivan
1164(5)
Note: The Central Meaning of New York Times v. Sullivan
1169(3)
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts; Associated Press v. Walker
1172(1)
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
1173(3)
Note: Public and Private Figures, Public and Private Speech
1176(1)
Dun & Bradstreet v. Greenmoss Builders
1177(1)
Note: Other False Statements of Fact
1178(1)
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
1179(1)
``Nonnewsworthy'' Disclosures of ``Private'' Information
1180(1)
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
1180(2)
Note: Invasion of Privacy and the First Amendment
1182(3)
Commercial Advertising
1185(1)
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council
1186(5)
Note: Virginia Pharmacy and ``the Free Flow of Commercial Information''
1191(3)
Note: Truthful, Nondeceptive Commercial Advertising after Virginia Pharmacy
1194(1)
Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Commission of New York
1195(1)
Note: Truthful, Nondeceptive Commercial Advertising after Central Hudson
1196(2)
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
1198(1)
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly
1199(1)
Thompson v. Western States Medical Center
1200(3)
Note: Truthful, Nondeceptive Commercial Advertising after Liquormart, Lorillard, and Thompson
1203(1)
Note: Additional Regulations of Commercial Speech
1204(4)
Obscenity
1208(1)
Roth v. United States; Alberts v. California
1209(1)
Note: Obscenity and Free Expression
1210(4)
Note: Developments in the Law of ``Obscenity'' 1957--1973
1214(2)
Miller v. California
1216(3)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
1219(5)
Note: The 1973 Reformulation and Its Aftermath
1224(3)
Note: Violence as Obscenity
1227(1)
New York v. Ferber
1228(2)
Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition
1230(3)
Note: Child Pornography
1233(1)
The Lewd, the Profane, and the Indecent
1234(1)
Cohen v. California
1234(3)
Note: Profanity, Cohen, and the Captive Audience
1237(3)
Erznoznik v. Jacksonville
1240(1)
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
1241(2)
Sable Communications, Inc. v. FCC
1243(1)
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
1244(1)
Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union
1245(3)
Note: ``Indecent'' Expression
1248(3)
Young v. American Mini-Theatres
1251(1)
City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres
1252(1)
City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books
1253(2)
Note: Zoning and Nude Dancing
1255(1)
Hate Speech and Pornography
1256(1)
Beauharnais v. Illinois
1256(4)
Note: Group Defamation and ``Hate Speech''
1260(4)
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
1264(6)
Wisconsin v. Mitchell
1270(1)
Note: R.A.V. and Mitchell
1271(2)
Virginia v. Black
1273(11)
Note: Pornography and the Victimization of Women
1284(6)
Note: ``Low'' Value Speech---Final Thoughts
1290(1)
Content-Neutral Restrictions: Limitations on the Means of Communication and the Problem of Content-Neutrality
1291(151)
General Principles
1291(1)
Schneider v. State
1291(1)
Martin v. City of Struthers
1292(1)
Kovacs v. Cooper
1293(1)
Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego
1294(1)
City of Ladue v. Gilleo
1295(1)
NAACP v. Alabama
1296(1)
Bartnicki v. Vopper
1297(1)
Note: The Search for Principles
1298(2)
Note: The Meaning of ``Content-Neutrality''
1300(4)
Speech on Public Property: The Public Forum
1304(1)
The Public Forum: Streets and Parks
1304(1)
Commonwealth v. Davis, aff'd sub nom. Davis v. Massachusetts
1304(1)
Hague v. CIO
1305(1)
Schneider v. State
1306(1)
Note: Regulating the Public Forum
1307(3)
Note: Devices for Regulating the Public Forum
1310(3)
The Public Forum: Other Publicly Owned Property
1313(1)
Adderley v. Florida
1314(1)
Note: ``No Less than a Private Owner of Property''?
1315(4)
International Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee
1319(3)
Note: Modern Public Forum Doctrine
1322(1)
Note: The Right to a ``Private'' Forum
1322(2)
The Public Forum: Unequal Access and the Problem of Content-Neutrality
1324(1)
Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley
1325(2)
Note: Mosley and the ``Equality'' of Ideas
1327(2)
Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights
1329(3)
Note: Lehman and the Limits of Mosley
1332(2)
Perry Educators' Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association
1334(2)
Note: Quintessential, Designated, and Nonpublic Forums
1336(4)
Note: Religious Expression and the Meaning of ``Viewpoint Neutrality''
1340(3)
Unequal Access and the Problem of Government Speech
1343(1)
Southeastern Promotions v. Conrad
1343(2)
Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico
1345(2)
Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington
1347(1)
Rust v. Sullivan
1348(3)
Note: The Implications of Rust
1351(1)
Legal Services Corporation v. Velazquez
1352(4)
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley
1356(3)
United States v. American Library Association
1359(8)
Symbolic Conduct
1367(1)
United States v. O'Brien
1368(5)
Note: Draft Card Burning and the First Amendment
1373(4)
Note: Flag Desecration and Misuse
1377(5)
Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.
1382(3)
City of Erie v. Pap's A.M.
1385(1)
Note: Computer Code
1386(1)
Regulation of Political Solicitation, Contribution, Expenditure, and Activity
1387(1)
Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment
1388(1)
Buckley v. Valeo
1389(8)
Note: Buckley and the Problem of Abridging Speech to ``Enhance'' the Electoral Process
1397(5)
Note: Subsidy and Disclosure
1402(3)
Note: Corporate Contributions and Expenditures
1405(3)
Note: Additional Regulation of the Electoral Process
1408(3)
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
1411(9)
Note: Regulating the Political Activities of Public Employees
1420(6)
Other Means of Expression: Litigation, Association, and the Right Not to Speak
1426(1)
NAACP v. Button
1426(1)
Note: Litigation and the First Amendment
1427(2)
Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees
1429(1)
Note: Association and the First Amendment
1430(1)
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale
1431(3)
Note: Evaluating Dale
1434(2)
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
1436(1)
Note: Compelled Affirmation, Expression, and Association: The Right Not to Speak
1437(4)
Note: Content-Neutral Restrictions---Final Thoughts
1441(1)
Freedom of the Press
1442(43)
A ``Preferred'' Status for the Press?
1442(1)
A Right to ``Gather'' News?
1443(1)
Branzburg v. Hayes
1443(4)
Note: A Right to Gather News?
1447(3)
Note: A Press Right of Access to Information?
1450(2)
Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia
1452(4)
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court
1456(1)
Note: Variations on the Press Right of Access
1457(2)
Differential Treatment of the Press
1459(1)
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue
1459(3)
Note: Differential Treatment
1462(1)
Regulating the Press to ``Improve'' the Marketplace of Ideas
1463(1)
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
1463(2)
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC
1465(2)
Note: Regulating the Airwaves
1467(6)
Turner Broadcasting System Inc. v. FCC
1473(2)
Note: Turner and the Regulation of Cable
1475(4)
Note: The First Amendment in Cyberspace
1479(3)
Note: Free Expression---Final Thoughts
1482(3)
The Constitution and Religion
1485(98)
Introduction: Historical and Analytical Overview
1485(16)
Everson v. Board of Education
1485(2)
Note: The History of the Religion Clauses
1487(6)
Note: General Approaches to the Religion Clauses
1493(4)
Note: Defining Religion
1497(4)
The Establishment Clause
1501(48)
The Anticoercion Principle
1501(1)
Lee v. Weisman
1501(9)
Note: The Noncoercion Principle
1510(2)
The Nonendorsement Principle and De Facto Establishments
1512(1)
Lynch v. Donnelly
1512(7)
Note: The Nonendorsement Principle
1519(7)
Impermissible Purposes: The School Prayer Cases
1526(1)
Note: Problems with a ``Purpose'' Test
1527(3)
Facially Neutral Statutes that Incidentally Aid Religion: Permissible and Impermissible Effects
1530(2)
Mueller v. Allen
1532(4)
Note: From Aguilar to Mitchell
1536(6)
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
1542(2)
Note: Purpose and Effect in Aid to Nonpublic Education---Benevolent Neutrality?
1544(4)
Note: Concluding Observations
1548(1)
The Free Exercise Clause: Required Accommodations
1549(18)
Braunfeld v. Brown
1550(1)
Sherbert v. Verner
1550(1)
Wisconsin v. Yoder
1551(2)
Note: Problems of Mandatory Accommodation
1553(3)
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith
1556(8)
Note: Should Accommodation Be Required?
1564(3)
Permissible Accommodation
1567(16)
Corporation of Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos
1567(5)
Texas Monthly v. Bullock
1572(1)
Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet
1573(2)
Note: When---If Ever---Should Accommodations of Religion Be Permitted?
1575(2)
Note: Free Exercise, Free Speech, and the Right of Expressive Association
1577(3)
Note: Concluding Observations
1580(3)
The Constitution, Baselines, and the Problem of Private Power
1583(66)
State Action, Federalism, and Individual Autonomy
1584(5)
State Action and Federalism
1584(1)
The Civil Rights Cases
1584(3)
Note: Federalism and the Substantive Content of the State Action Doctrine
1587(1)
State Action and Individual Autonomy
1588(1)
Pure Inaction and the Theory of Governmental Neutrality
1589(20)
Pure Inaction
1589(1)
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services
1589(2)
Flagg Brothers v. Brooks
1591(4)
Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.
1595(1)
Note: The Problem of the Passive State
1596(5)
Judicial Action and the Theory of Government Neutrality
1601(1)
Shelley v. Kraemer
1601(3)
Note: Shelley v. Kraemer, State Inaction, and the Theory of Government Neutrality
1604(5)
Constitutionally Impermissible Departures from Neutrality: State Subsidization, Approval, and Encouragement
1609(17)
State Subsidization of Private Conduct
1609(1)
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
1609(3)
Note: Subsidies, Penalties, and the Search for a Baseline
1612(3)
Rendell-Baker v. Kohn
1615(1)
San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee
1616(1)
Note: State Action as Coercion or Significant Encouragement
1617(3)
State Licensing and Authorization
1620(1)
Public Utilities Commission v. Pollak
1620(1)
Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
1621(2)
Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
1623(2)
Note: Licensing, Authorization, and Entwinement as State Action
1625(1)
Constitutionally Required Departures from Neutrality? The Public Function Doctrine
1626(12)
Marsh v. Alabama
1626(2)
Note: The ``Public Function'' Theory and the Passive State
1628(5)
Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
1633(2)
Note: Public Functions as ``Exclusive Prerogatives'' of the State
1635(3)
Unconstitutional Conditions and the Benefit/Burden Distinction
1638(10)
Rust v. Sullivan
1639(1)
Maher v. Roe
1640(1)
South Dakota v. Dole
1641(1)
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
1641(1)
Note: Benefits, Burdens, and Coercion
1642(6)
Some Final Thoughts
1648(1)
Table of Cases 1649(16)
Table of Authoritites 1665(24)
Index 1689

Supplemental Materials

What is included with this book?

The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

The Used, Rental and eBook copies of this book are not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included. This is true even if the title states it includes any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

Rewards Program