did-you-know? rent-now

Amazon no longer offers textbook rentals. We do!

did-you-know? rent-now

Amazon no longer offers textbook rentals. We do!

We're the #1 textbook rental company. Let us show you why.

9780735550759

Criminal Law : Case Studies and Controversies

by
  • ISBN13:

    9780735550759

  • ISBN10:

    0735550751

  • Format: Hardcover
  • Copyright: 2004-11-01
  • Publisher: Wolters Kluwer
  • Purchase Benefits
  • Free Shipping Icon Free Shipping On Orders Over $35!
    Your order must be $35 or more to qualify for free economy shipping. Bulk sales, PO's, Marketplace items, eBooks and apparel do not qualify for this offer.
  • eCampus.com Logo Get Rewarded for Ordering Your Textbooks! Enroll Now
List Price: $116.00

Summary

Take a new approach to criminal law, with an innovative casebook that injects human interest into a course many students have found dry or difficult, with Criminal Law: Case Studies and Controversies . The skillful use of case studies as a vehicle for exploring the full range of criminal law makes this casebook distinctly compelling. for each topic area, this carefully crafted text conveys traditional material in a refreshing and engaging new format: a case study provides a detailed story about the people and events leading up To The offense; the text even includes 120 photographs related To The crime stories presented provocative and timely cases from a wide variety of jurisdictions are followed by the then-existing statutes relevant To The case. The Teacheriquest;s Manual contains an aftermath for each story, plus any court opinions in the case, allowing instructors to compare their in-class legal analysis To The actual resolution treatise-like summary of the law gives students an overview of the law, introduces the underlying theoretical principles, and provides context on the law of the jurisdiction of the sectioniquest;s principal case problem cases allow students to test their mastery of the legal summaries exploration of the current controversy in each area of law discussed, with materials that include views on each side of the question, To help develop students' analytic and argument skills to assist instructors in applying the case study method, The Teacher's Manual contains: the aftermath of each case in the text legal analysis of all principal cases and problem cases summary of the arguments on each side of the highlighted controversies teaching suggestions for each section of the book summary sheets for use in class Before you select materials for your next class, make a careful inspection of Criminal Law: Case Studies and Controversies, and see for yourself what an exceptional teaching tool Robinson has created.

Table of Contents

List of Charts and Tables
xxvii
Preface xxix
Acknowledgments xxxi
PART I. INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS
1(128)
An Overview of the Criminal Justice Process: The Steps in the Process
1(22)
The Nature of Criminal Law and Its Analytic Structure
23(16)
Overview of the Sources of Criminal Law
23(3)
Problem: Fear of the Daggers
26(1)
Overview of the Operational Structure of Criminal Law
27(5)
Problem: Fear, Pain, and Bubble Gum
32(2)
The Law
34(2)
Model Penal Code Section 2.02. General Requirements of Culpability; Section 2.11. Consent
34(2)
Overview of the Nature of Criminal Law
36(3)
The Legality Principle
39(34)
The Case of Ray Brent Marsh
39(7)
The Law
46(1)
Code of Georgia Annotated (2002)
46(1)
Model Penal Code Section 1.05. All Offenses Defined by Statute; Section 250.10. Abuse of Corpse
47(1)
Overview of the Legality Principle
47(6)
Problem: The CG-PLA at the United Nations
53(1)
Overview of Statutory Interpretation
54(5)
Problem: United States v. Gray
59(1)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Provide the Precision in Formulation that the Legality Principle Demands? Isn't There Sometimes Value in Permitting Prohibitions To Be Vague?
60(13)
Report to the President from Justice Robert H. Jackson, Chief of Counsel for the United States in the Prosecution of Axis War Criminals
60(3)
City of Chicago v. Jesus Morales, et al.
63(6)
Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville
69(4)
Theories of Punishment
73(56)
The Case of Sara Jane Olson
73(6)
The Law
79(3)
Deering's California Penal Code Annotated (1975)
79(3)
Problem: Daughters' Mustard
82(1)
Overview of Theories of Punishment
82(9)
Case Study: Sara Jane Olson
91(1)
Discussion Materials: Should Criminal Law Rules Be Formulated to Optimize Deterrence Through a Threatened Sanction?
91(7)
Jeremy Bentham, The Theory of Legislation
91(2)
Johannes Andenaes, The General Preventive Effects of Punishment
93(1)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, The Role of Deterrence in the Formulation of Criminal Law Rules: At Its Worst When Doing Its Best
94(4)
Discussion Materials: Should Criminal Law Rules Be Formulated to Optimize Rehabilitation or, Failing That, the Incapacitation of Dangerous Persons?
98(13)
James Q. Wilson, Thinking About Crime
99(3)
Andrew von Hirsch, Incapacitation
102(2)
Paul H. Robinson, Punishing Dangerousness: Cloaking Preventive Detention as Criminal Justice
104(7)
Discussion Materials: Should Criminal Law Rules Be Formulated to Give Offenders the Punishment They Deserve, No More, No Less?
111(11)
Immanuel Kant, The Philosophy of Law
111(2)
Jeffrie G. Murphy, Three Mistakes About Retributivism
113(2)
Michael S. Moore, The Moral Worth of Retribution
115(2)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, The Utility of Desert
117(5)
Discussion Materials: If Criminal Law Rules Are to Be Formulated to Advance Two or More of the Traditional Purposes of Punishment --- Deterrence, Rehabilitation/Incapacitation, and Desert---What Should Be the Interrelation Among Those Distributive Principles?
122(7)
Model Penal Code Section 1.02. Purposes; Principles of Construction
122(1)
Henry M. Hart, Jr., The Aims of the Criminal Law
123(1)
Paul H. Robinson, Hybrid Principles for the Distribution of Criminal Sanctions
124(5)
PART II. OFFENSE REQUIREMENTS
129(78)
Culpability Requirements
131(38)
The Case of Thomas Fungwe
131(2)
The Law
133(5)
Michigan Statutes Annotated (1999)
133(3)
People v. Richardson
136(1)
People v. Ryczek
136(1)
People v. Clark
137(1)
People v. Clark
137(1)
People v. Traughber
137(1)
The Case of Raymond Lennard Garnett
138(1)
The Law
139(7)
Annotated Code of Maryland (1990)
139(5)
Eggleston v. State
144(1)
Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County
144(1)
Model Penal Code Section 1.13. General Definitions; Section 2.02. General Requirements of Culpability
144(2)
Overview of Culpability Requirements
146(9)
Notes on Culpability Requirements
146(7)
Model Penal Code Section 2.02 Commentary
153(2)
Problem: Babies and Ditches
155(1)
Problem: Oatmeal for Ian
156(1)
Discussion Materials: What Is the Minimum Culpability, If Any, That Should Be Required for Criminal Liability?
157(6)
Glanville Williams, Reasons for Punishing Negligence
157(1)
Model Penal Code Section 2.02 Commentary
158(1)
Samuel H. Pillsbury, Crimes of Indifference
159(1)
Laurie L. Levenson, Good Faith Defenses: Reshaping Strict Liability Crimes
160(3)
Discussion Materials: Should a Person's Negligence (and Recklessness) Be Judged Against an Objective or an Individualized Standard?
163(6)
H.L.A. Hart, Punishment and Responsibility
163(1)
Model Penal Code Section 2.02 Commentary
164(1)
George P. Fletcher, The Theory of Criminal Negligence: A Comparative Analysis
165(4)
Culpability and Mistake
169(38)
The Case of Thomas Laseter
169(4)
The Law
173(7)
Alaska Statutes (1982)
173(7)
Model Penal Code Section 2.04. Ignorance or Mistake
180(1)
Overview of Culpability Requirements & Mistake Defenses
180(6)
Discussion Materials: What Kind of Mistake as to Consent, If Any, Should Be Permitted to Provide a Defense to Rape?
186(11)
Susan Estrich, Rape
187(3)
Lynne N. Henderson, Review Essay: What Makes Rape a Crime?
190(4)
Joshua Dressler, Where We Have Been, and Where We Might Be Going: Some Cautionary Reflections on Rape Law Reform
194(2)
Lani Anne Remick, Read Her Lips: An Argument for a Verbal Consent Standard in Rape
196(1)
Overview of the Function of Criminal Law Doctrine
197(10)
PART III. HOMICIDE AND RELATED ISSUES
207(112)
Homicide: Doctrines of Aggravation
209(26)
The Case of Sabine Davidson
209(5)
The Law
214(8)
Kansas Statutes Annotated (1997)
214(4)
The Kansas Sentencing Commission Desk Reference Manual
218(3)
Model Penal Code Section 210.1 Criminal Homicide; Section 210.2. Murder; Section 210.3. Manslaughter; Section 210.4. Negligent Homicide
221(1)
Overview of Homicide Aggravations
222(3)
Model Penal Code Section 210.2 Commentary
222(2)
Model Penal Code Section 210.2 Commentary
224(1)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Recognize a Felony-Murder Rule?
225(10)
Model Penal Code Section 210.2 Commentary
225(2)
Crump and Crump, In Defense of Felony Murder
227(2)
People v. James Edward Washington
229(3)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Study 16: The Culpability of the Person --- Felony Murder
232(3)
Death Penalty
235(28)
The Case of William King
235(7)
The Law
242(6)
Texas Penal Code (1998)
242(4)
Model Penal Code Section 210.6. Sentence of Death for Murder; Further Proceedings to Determine Sentence
246(2)
Overview of the Death Penalty
248(5)
Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics
249(4)
Discussion Materials: Should Capital Punishment Be Allowed?
253(10)
Hugo A. Bedau, Arguments For and Against Capital Punishment
253(3)
Hugo A. Bedau, Innocence and the Death Penalty
256(2)
Ernest van den Haag, Punishing Criminals
258(1)
Elizabeth Rapaport, The Death Penalty and Gender Discrimination
258(2)
Robert Weisberg, Deregulating Death
260(3)
Homicide: Doctrines of Mitigation
263(26)
The Case of John Gounagias
263(2)
The Law
265(3)
Remington and Ballinger's Annotated Codes and Statutes of Washington (1914)
265(2)
Maher v. People
267(1)
Model Penal Code Section 210.2. Murder; Section 210.3. Manslaughter
268(1)
Overview of Homicide Mitigations
268(5)
Problem: People v. Mentry: ``Mother Says She Was Told To Sit on Child, Who Died''
273(1)
Discussion Materials: With What Characteristics of the Defendant, If Any, Should the Reasonable Person Standard Be Individualized?
274(15)
Model Penal Code Section 210.3 Commentary
274(1)
Director of Public Prosecutions v. Camplin
275(2)
George P. Fletcher, Provocation
277(2)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Study 11: Individualization of the Objective Standard of Negligence
279(3)
People v. Helen Wu
282(7)
Causation
289(30)
The Case of Joe Paul Govan
289(2)
The Law
291(8)
Arizona Revised Statutes (1980)
291(7)
Model Penal Code Section 2.03. Causal Relationship Between Conduct and Result; Section 5.05. Mitigation in Cases of Lesser Danger
298(1)
Problem: Manny the Master
299(1)
Overview of Causation
300(4)
Discussion Materials: Should Resulting Harm Be Relevant to Criminal Liability? Should a Completed Offense Be Punished More than an Unsuccessful Attempt?
304(15)
Sanford H. Kadish, The Criminal Law and the Luck of the Draw
305(5)
George P. Fletcher, A Crime of Self-Defense: Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial
310(2)
Paul H. Robinson, The Role of Harm and Evil in Criminal Law: A Study in Legislative Deception?
312(7)
PART IV. INCHOATE LIABILITY
319(86)
Attempt Liability
321(26)
The Case of Robert Jackson
321(3)
The Law
324(4)
United States Code (1976)
324(2)
United States v. Mandujano
326(1)
Model Penal Code Section 5.01. Criminal Attempt; Section 5.05. Mitigation in Cases of Lesser Danger
326(2)
Problem: A Plan to Kill
328(1)
Overview of Attempt Liability
329(6)
Discussion Materials: What Conduct Toward an Offense Should Be Sufficient to Constitute a Criminal Attempt?
335(12)
Model Penal Code Section 5.01 Commentary
336(1)
Andrew Ashworth, Criminal Attempts and the Role of Resulting Harm under the Code, and in the Common Law
337(2)
Francis B. Sayre, Criminal Attempts
339(1)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Study 1: Objective Requirements of Attempt; Conflict Between Community Views and Criminal Codes
340(7)
Impossibility
347(24)
The Case of John Henry Ivy
347(2)
The Law
349(5)
Mississippi Code Annotated (1988)
349(3)
William Stokes v. State of Mississippi
352(1)
Model Penal Code Section 5.01. Criminal Attempt; Section 5.05. Mitigation in Cases of Lesser Danger
353(1)
Overview of Impossibility
354(8)
People v. Rollino
354(3)
Notes on Impossibility
357(5)
Problem: The Smuggler's Deceit
362(1)
Problem: In re ``The Nose . . .''
363(1)
Discussion Materials: If It Is Impossible for a Person to Commit the Offense Attempted, Should the Attempt Nonetheless Constitute a Crime? In Other Words, Should a Potential for Actual Commission Be Required, Or Is a Subjective Belief in the Potential for Commission Enough?
364(7)
George P. Fletcher, A Crime of Self-Defense: Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial
364(1)
Model Penal Code Section 5.01 Commentary
364(1)
Lawrence Crocker, Justice in Criminal Liability: Decriminalizing Harmless Attempts
365(6)
Conspiracy
371(34)
The Case of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman
371(5)
The Law
376(13)
United States Code, Title 18 (1993)
376(9)
Tates v. United States
385(1)
Scales v. United States
385(1)
United States v. Sinclair
385(1)
Pinkerton v. United States
386(1)
United States v. Falcone
386(1)
United States v. Feola
386(1)
Model Penal Code Section 5.03. Criminal Conspiracy; Section 1.07. Method of Prosecution When Conduct Constitutes More Than One Offense; Section 5.05. Multiple Convictions Barred
387(2)
Overview of Conspiracy
389(5)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Recognize an Offense of Conspiracy?
394(11)
Developments in the Law: Criminal Conspiracy
394(3)
Model Penal Code Section 5.03 Commentary
397(3)
Philip E. Johnson, The Unnecessary Crime of Conspiracy
400(2)
David B. Filvaroff, Conspiracy and the First Amendment
402(3)
PART V. DOCTRINES OF IMPUTATION
405(122)
Notes on Imputation Generally
405(4)
Voluntary Intoxication
409(26)
The Case of Jordan Weaver
409(4)
The Law
413(4)
West's Annotated Indiana Codes (1991)
413(2)
Rhodes v. State
415(1)
Terry v. State of Indiana
416(1)
Model Penal Code Section 2.08. Intoxication
416(1)
Overview of Voluntary Intoxication
417(5)
Notes on Voluntary Intoxication
417(3)
Mitchell Keiter, Just Say No Excuse: The Rise and Fall of the Intoxication Defense
420(2)
Problem: Food for Thought
422(1)
Discussion Materials: What Level of Culpable Mental State, If Any, Should Be Imputed When It Is Absent Because the Offender Voluntarily Intoxicated Himself?
423(12)
Director of Public Prosecutions v. Majewski
423(5)
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Daniel Lee Graves
428(1)
Stephen J. Morse, Fear of Danger, Flight from Culpability
429(2)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Study 10: Voluntary Intoxication
431(1)
Paul H. Robinson, Causing the Conditions of One's Own Defense: A Study in the Limits of Theory in Criminal Law Doctrine
432(3)
Complicity
435(28)
The Case of Cardinal Bernard Law
435(6)
The Law
441(5)
Massachusetts General Laws Annotated (1988)
441(4)
Commonwealth v. Morrow
445(1)
Commonwealth v. Stout
445(1)
Model Penal Code Section 2.06. Liability for Conduct of Another; Complicity
445(1)
Overview of Complicity
446(4)
Problem: Bib Tries to Help
450(1)
Discussion Materials: Should Criminal Liability Be Imposed for Facilitating Conduct That One Knows Is a Crime, Even If Facilitating the Crime Is Not One's Purpose?
451(12)
Model Penal Code Section 2.04 Tentative Draft No. 1 Commentary
451(3)
Model Penal Code Section 2.06 Commentary
454(2)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Study 9: Culpability Requirements for Complicity
456(5)
Wayne R. LaFave & Austin W. Scott, Accomplice Liability --- Acts and Mental State
461(2)
The Act Requirement and Liability for an Omission
463(38)
The Case of David Cash
463(8)
The Law
471(7)
Nevada Revised Statutes Annotated (1998)
471(7)
Lee v. GNLV Corporation
478(1)
Labastida v. State
478(1)
Model Penal Code Section 2.01. Requirement of Voluntary Act
478(1)
Problem: Dunning's Deal
478(1)
Overview of the Act Requirement and Liability for an Omission
479(9)
Notes on the Act Requirement
479(6)
Notes on Liability for an Omission
485(3)
Discussion Materials: Should There Be a Criminal-Law-Enforced Duty to Protect, Rescue, or Assist a Stranger in Danger If One Can Do So Without Unreasonable Risk or Inconvenience?
488(13)
37 Who Saw Murder Didn't Call Police
489(2)
Rhode Island General Laws Section 11-56-1
491(1)
Vermont Statutes Annotated, Title 12, Chapter 23, Section 519 Emergency Medical Care
491(1)
Wisconsin Statutes Annotated Section 940.34(1), (2) Duty to Aid Endangered Crime Victim
492(1)
Joshua Dressler, Some Brief Thoughts (Mostly Negative) About ``Bad Samaritan'' Laws
492(3)
Daniel B. Yeager, A Radical Community of Aid: A Rejoinder to Opponents of Affirmative Duties to Help Strangers
495(3)
A Penal Code Prepared by the Indian Law Commissioners
498(3)
Corporate Criminality
501(26)
The Case of Ford Motor Company
501(7)
The Law
508(3)
Burns Indiana Statutes Annotated (1978)
508(1)
Howell v. State
509(1)
Model Penal Code Section 2.07. Liability of Corporations, Unincorporated Associations and Persons Acting, or Under a Duty to Act, in Their Behalf
510(1)
Overview of Corporate Criminality
511(3)
Problem: Evergreen Greenbacks
514(1)
Discussion Materials: Should Criminal Liability Be Imposed on a Legal Fiction, Such as a Corporation?
515(12)
John Coffee, Corporate Criminal Responsibility
516(3)
Douglas S. Anderson, Corporate Homicide: The Stark Realities of Artificial Beings and Legal Fictions
519(2)
Paul H. Robinson & Michael Cahill, Law Without Justice: How and Why Criminal Law Deliberately Sacrifices Desert
521(3)
Andrew Ashworth, A New Form of Corporate Liability?
524(3)
PART VI. GENERAL DEFENSES
527(2)
PART VI.a. Justification Defenses Generally
529(128)
Overview of Justification Defenses Generally
529(2)
Lesser Evils Defense
531(28)
The Case of the Israeli General Security Service
531(4)
The Law
535(5)
Israeli Penal Law
535(5)
Model Penal Code Section 3.02. Justification Generally; Choice of Evils
540(1)
Problem: A Life-Saving Break-In
540(1)
Overview of Lesser Evils Defense
541(6)
Discussion Materials: What Limitations, If Any, Should Be Placed on the Lesser Evils Justification Defense? Should the Defense Even Be Recognized?
547(12)
State v. Warshow
547(3)
State v. Green
550(2)
Kent Greenawalt, Conflicts of Law and Morality --- Instructions of Amelioration
552(4)
Steven M. Bauer & Peter J. Eckerstrom, The State Made Me Do It: The Applicability of the Necessity Defense to Civil Disobedience
556(3)
Defensive Force Justifications
559(40)
The Case of Bernhard Goetz
559(4)
The Law
563(13)
New York Penal Law (1984)
563(10)
Model Penal Code Section 3.04. Use of Force in Self-Protection; Section 3.06. Use of Force for the Protection of Property
573(3)
Overview of Defensive Force Justifications
576(6)
Problem: Rosie's Home Run
582(1)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Give a Defense for the Use of Whatever Force Is Necessary to Defend Persons or Property Against an Unlawful Attack? Or Should the Law Deny a Defense If the Force, Even Though Necessary for Defense, Would Injure Interests Greater Than Those Injured by the Unlawful Attack?
582(17)
Judgment of the German Supreme Court of September 20, 1920
583(1)
John Q. LaFond, The Case for Liberalizing the Use of Deadly Force in Self-Defense
584(3)
Model Penal Code Section 3.04 Commentary
587(1)
Model Penal Code Section 3.06 Commentary
588(1)
George P. Fletcher, Proportionality and the Psychotic Aggressor: A Vignette in Comparative Criminal Theory
589(3)
Garrett Epps, Any Which Way But Loose: Interpretive Strategies and Attitudes Toward Violence in the Evolution of the Anglo-American ``Retreat Rule''
592(3)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Study 6: Use of Force in Defense of Property
595(4)
Public Authority Justifications
599(28)
The Case of Officer Elton Hymon
599(4)
The Law
603(8)
Tennessee Code Annotated (1974)
603(3)
Morelock v. State
606(1)
Leake v. State
606(1)
Copeland v. State
607(1)
Bouie v. City of Columbia
607(1)
Model Penal Code Section 3.03. Execution of Public Duty; Section 3.07. Use of Force in Law Enforcement; Section 3.08. Use of Force by Persons with Special Responsibility for Care, Discipline or Safety of Others
608(3)
Overview of Public Authority Justifications
611(4)
Problem: Docker's Box
615(1)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Allow the Shooting of a Fleeing Felon If It Is Necessary to Prevent Escape?
616(11)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Study 7: Citizen's Law Enforcement Authority
617(3)
Tennessee v. Garner et al.
620(4)
Abraham N. Tennenbaum, The Influence of the Garner Decision on Police Use of Deadly Force
624(3)
Mistake as to a Justification
627(30)
The Case of Richard John Jahnke, Jr.
627(4)
The Law
631(7)
Wyoming Statutes (1982)
631(3)
Loy v. State
634(1)
Ross v. State
634(1)
State v. Helton
635(1)
Foley v. State
635(1)
Harries v. State
636(1)
Delaney v. State
636(1)
Model Penal Code Section 3.09. Reckless or Negligent Use of Otherwise Justifiable Force; Section 2.10. Military Orders
637(1)
Problem: Moro's Mistake
638(1)
Overview of Mistake as to a Justification
638(7)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Recognize a Defense or Mitigation for an Honest But Unreasonable Mistake as to a Justification?
645(12)
Herbert Wechsler & Jerome Michael, The Rationale of the Law of Homicide
645(1)
People v. Young
646(3)
Model Penal Code Section 3.09(2) Commentary
649(1)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Testing Competing Theories of Justification
650(7)
PART VI.b. Excuse Defenses Generally
657(112)
Overview of the Nature of Excuses
657(8)
Mistake Excuses
665(22)
The Case of Bernard Barker
665(4)
The Law
669(3)
United States Code, Title 18 (1971)
669(1)
United States v. Simpson
669(1)
United States v. Mancuso
669(1)
Raley v. Ohio
670(1)
Cox v. Louisiana
670(1)
Finn v. United States
670(1)
Model Penal Code Section 2.04. Ignorance or Mistake
671(1)
Overview of General Mistake of Law Excuse
672(3)
Problem: Sophie's Stand
675(1)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Recognize an Excuse Defense for a Reasonable Mistake of Law?
676(11)
Thomas W. White, Reliance on Apparent Authority as a Defense to Criminal Prosecutions
676(1)
Louis B. Schwartz, Reform of the Federal Criminal Laws: Issues, Tactics and Prospects
677(1)
George P. Fletcher, Arguments for Strict Liability: Mistakes of Law
677(3)
People v. Marrero
680(3)
Dan M. Kahan, Ignorance of the Law Is an Excuse --- But Only for the Virtuous
683(4)
Insanity
687(38)
The Case of Andrew Goldstein
687(5)
The Law
692(6)
New York Penal Code (1999)
692(5)
People v. Segal
697(1)
Model Penal Code Section 4.01. Mental Disease or Defect Excluding Responsibility; Section 4.02. Evidence of Mental Disease or Defect Admissible When Relevant to Element of the Offense
698(1)
Overview of Insanity
698(11)
Notes on the Insanity Defense
698(8)
Lisa Callahan, et al., Insanity Defense Reform in the United States --- Post-Hinckley
706(3)
Problem: Michael's Madness
709(1)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Recognize an Excuse Defense for an Offender Who, Because of Mental Illness, Knows His Conduct Constituting the Offense Is Wrong But Lacks the Capacity to Control It?
710(15)
United States v. Robert Lyons
710(4)
Legislative History to Public Law 98-473, Title IV, Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1983
714(2)
Jodie English, The Light Between Twilight and Dusk: Federal Criminal Law and the Volitional Insanity Defense
716(3)
Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Study 12: Insanity
719(6)
Disability Excuses
725(44)
The Case of Patty Hearst
725(8)
The Law
733(2)
United States Code, Title 18 (1974)
733(1)
United States v. Gordon
734(1)
D'Aquino v. United States
735(1)
Model Penal Code Section 2.08. Intoxication; Section 2.09. Duress
735(1)
Problem: Arthur's Adventure
735(2)
Overview of Disability Excuses
737(6)
Problem: The Brothers' Brawl
743(1)
Problem: Hypnotizing Bunny
744(1)
Problem: Who Is Timothy Drum?
745(1)
Problem: People v. Kimura: ``A `Cultural Defense' at Issue in Trial''
746(2)
Overview of Problematic Excuses
748(5)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Recognize an Excuse Defense for a Person Who Commits an Offense Because Coercively Indoctrinated with Values and Beliefs That Make the Person Want to Do So?
753(16)
Paul H. Robinson, Are We Responsible for Who We Are? The Case of Richard R. Tenneson
753(2)
Richard Delgado, Ascription of Criminal States of Mind: Toward a Defense Theory for the Coercively Persuaded (``Brainwashed'') Defendant
755(2)
Joshua Dressler, Professor Delgado's ``Brainwashing'' Defense: Courting a Determinist Legal System
757(4)
Richard Delgado, A Response to Professor Dressler
761(2)
United States v. Alexander
763(6)
PART VI.c. Nonexculpatory Defenses Generally
769(28)
Overview of Nonexculpatory Defenses Generally
769(2)
Entrapment
771(26)
The Case of John DeLorean
771(5)
The Law
776(9)
United States Code (1982)
776(6)
Grimm v. United States
782(1)
Sorrells v. United States
782(1)
Hampton v. United States
783(1)
Model Penal Code Section 2.13. Entrapment
784(1)
Overview of Entrapment
785(4)
Problem: JJ's Out
789(1)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Recognize an Entrapment Defense?
789(8)
Model Penal Code Section 2.13 Commentary
789(3)
Louis Michael Seidman, The Supreme Court, Entrapment, and Our Criminal Justice Dilemma
792(3)
Andrew J. Ashworth, Defences of General Application: The Law Commission's Report No. 83: (3) Entrapment
795(2)
PART VII. CHANGING PATTERNS OF CRIMINALITY
797(64)
Rape
799(34)
The Case of Eric Steven Carlson
799(2)
The Law
801(12)
Michigan Statutes Annotated (2000)
801(6)
People v. Premo
807(1)
People v. Berlin
808(1)
People v. Jansson
808(1)
People v. Hale
808(1)
People v. Lardie & Hudick
809(1)
Model Penal Code Section 213.1. Rape and Related Offenses
809(4)
Overview of Rape
813(5)
Margaret T. Gordon & Stephanie Riger, The Female Fear: The Social Cost of Rape
813(2)
Wayne R. LaFave, Rape --- Overview; Act and Mental State
815(3)
Problem: Bob and Linda
818(1)
Discussion Materials: Should Rape Liability Be Allowed in the Absence of Force or Threat of Force? Should It Be Allowed Upon Use of Nonphysical Coercion to Gain Acquiescence?
819(14)
Susan Ager, The Incident
819(1)
Stephen J. Schulhofer, Rape: Legal Aspects
820(3)
David P. Bryden, Redefining Rape
823(5)
Wisconsin Statutes Section 940.225. Sexual Assault
828(3)
Catharine MacKinnon, A Rally Against Rape
831(2)
Hate Crimes
833(28)
The Case of Todd Mitchell
833(3)
The Law
836(3)
Wisconsin Statutes (1989)
836(3)
Overview of Hate Crimes
839(9)
James B. Jacobs & Kimberly Potter, Hate Crime Laws
839(9)
Discussion Materials: Should the Criminal Law Impose Additional Liability and Punishment for an Offense That Is Motivated by Hatred Toward an Identifiable Group?
848(13)
Frederick M. Lawrence, Punishing Hate: Bias Crimes Under American Law
848(6)
Susan Gellman, Hate Crime Laws Are Thought Crime Laws
854(7)
PART VIII. PROVING CRIMES
861(10)
Proving Crimes
863(8)
The Law
863(1)
Model Penal Code Section 1.12. Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
863(1)
Overview of Proving Crimes
864(7)
APPENDIX A. ADVANCED ISSUES
871(94)
Theories of Punishment
873(6)
Advanced Issues
873(6)
Notes on Hybrid Distributive Principles
873(6)
Culpability Requirements
879(18)
Advanced Issues
879(18)
Notes on Determining Offense Culpability Requirements
879(18)
Culpability and Mistake
897(2)
Advanced Issues
897(2)
Flow Chart of Functions of Criminal Law
897(2)
Homicide: Doctrines of Aggravation
899(2)
Advanced Issues
899(2)
California Penal Code §§ 187, 188, 189, 192. Homicide Offenses
899(2)
Death Penalty
901(4)
Advanced Issues
901(4)
Elizabeth Rapaport, The Death Penalty and Gender Discrimination, cont.
901(4)
Causation
905(8)
Advanced Issues Relating to Causation
905(4)
Notes on Causation
905(4)
Advanced Issues Relating to the Significance of Resulting Harm
909(4)
Sanford H. Kadish, The Criminal Law and the Luck of the Draw
909(4)
Attempt Liability
913(6)
Advanced Issues
913(6)
Notes on the Culpability Requirements of Attempt Liability
913(3)
Problem: Gambling Life
916(3)
Impossibility
919(8)
Advanced Issues
919(8)
Notes on Impossibility
919(1)
Problem: The Crays Go to Church
920(7)
Conspiracy
927(14)
Advanced Issues
927(14)
Note, Conspiracy: Statutory Reform Since the Model Penal Code
927(4)
Further Notes on Conspiracy Culpability Requirements
931(4)
Problem: Selling Death
935(1)
Notes on Collateral Consequences of Conspiracy
935(4)
Problem: Bank Robbery with a Sub
939(1)
Problem: Bongo Sam Blows It
939(2)
Voluntary Intoxication
941(2)
Advanced Issues
941(2)
Current Indiana Statutes
941(1)
Sanchez v. State of Indiana
941(2)
Complicity
943(10)
Advanced Issues
943(10)
Notes on Complicity Culpability Requirements
943(4)
Notes on the Requirements for Liability for Causing Crime by an Innocent
947(3)
Problem: The Egg Hunt
950(3)
Corporate Criminality
953(2)
Advanced Issues
953(2)
Problem: Collapse at Kalahoo No. 3
953(2)
Defensive Force Justifications
955(4)
Advanced Issues
955(4)
Notes on the Unknowingly Justified Actor
955(4)
Mistake Excuses
959(2)
Law (Subsequent)
959(2)
Entrapment 951
961(4)
Advanced Issues
961(4)
Notes on Limiting the Detrimental Effects of Nonexculpatory Defenses
961(4)
APPENDIX B. MODEL PENAL CODE SELECTED PROVISIONS
965(100)
Table of Authors 1065(2)
Table of Model Penal Code References 1067(4)
Index 1071

Supplemental Materials

What is included with this book?

The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

The Used, Rental and eBook copies of this book are not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included. This is true even if the title states it includes any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

Rewards Program