Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions

by Mikhail Filippov , Peter C. Ordeshook , Olga Shvetsova

• ISBN13: 9780521016483
• ISBN10: 0521016487
• Format: Paperback
• Copyright: 2004-02-09
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Summary

Because of the redistributive nature of institutions and the availability of implementable alternatives with different distributive consequences, the desire of federation members to change institutional specifics in their favor is a permanent feature of the federal political process. This is so for two reasons. First, states or their equivalents in democratic federations usually can succeed in renegotiating the rules if they feel sufficiently motivated to do so. Second, in the case of a federation it is more or less clear who stands to benefit from any change in institutions. Thus, the existence of an equilibrium of constitutional legitimacy at the popular and elite levels cannot be taken for granted. The authors show that the presence in the political process of agents who are 'naturally committed' to the status-quo institutional arrangement can suffice to coordinate voters to act as if they support existing constitutional arrangements.

Table of Contents

1. Federations and the theoretical problem: 1.1 Why Federalism

1.2 Definitions

1.3 The long search for stability

Federalism as nuisance

Federalism as engine of prosperity

Riker as intermediary

1.4 The fundamental problem of stability

1.5 Basic premises and conclusions

2. Federal bargaining: 2.1 Alliances versus federations

2.2 The private character of public goods

2.3 Equilibrium selection and redistribution

2.4 The 'federal problem'

2.5 Bargaining for control of the center

2.6 Allocating jurisdictions

2.7 Three levels of institutional design

3. Two cases of uninstitutionalized bargaining: 3.1 The Czechoslovak dissolution

3.2 The Soviet dissolution

3.3 The feasibility of success in initial bargaining

3.4 Secession: the special road to renegotiation

4. Representation: 4.1 Two alternative models of Federalism

4.2 A national venue for bargaining

4.3 Within versus without

4.4 Direct versus delegated representation

4.5 Other parameters of design

4.6 Bilateral decision making and the case of Russia

5. Incentives: 5.1 Institutional enforcement

5.2 The court

5.3 Some simple rules of constitutional design

5.4 Voters versus elites

5.5 Desirable imperfection and a democratic as if principle

6. Political parties in a federal state: 6.1 An extreme hypothesis

6.2 Parties in a democracy

6.3 The idealized party system

6.4 Integrated parties

6.5 Integration outside the United States

Australian Federalism and the role of parties

Canada

6.6 India

Leadership incentives

Rank and file incentives

The party and Federalism

1967 and thereafter

7. Institutional sources of federal stability I: 7.1 Introduction

7.2 Level 2 and the federalist

7.3 Level 3 institutions

7.4 Australia, Canada, Germany, and India revisited

Germany

Canada

Canada vs, Australia and India

7.3 Local and regional design parameters

8. Institutional sources of federal stability II: 8.1 Electoral mechanisms and societal structures

Representation

Ethnicity

Defining federal subjects

Number of local jurisdictions

Authority over local governments

8.2 Bicameralism

Symmetry

Presidential authority

Presidential selection

Electoral connections

8.3 Level 1 and the scope of the federal mandate

8.4 Level 0 - things beyond design

9. Designing Federalism: 9.1 Russia

Electoral arrangements

Regional autonomy

Constitutional matters

Parties and the current status quo

9.2 The European Union

Background

The role of parties

The puzzle of the collusion

France versus Britain

EU institutional design

9.4 Conclusion.