did-you-know? rent-now

Amazon no longer offers textbook rentals. We do!

did-you-know? rent-now

Amazon no longer offers textbook rentals. We do!

We're the #1 textbook rental company. Let us show you why.

9781587785740

Federal Courts And The Law Of Federal-state Relations

by ;
  • ISBN13:

    9781587785740

  • ISBN10:

    1587785749

  • Edition: 5th
  • Format: Hardcover
  • Copyright: 2004-06-14
  • Publisher: West Group

Note: Supplemental materials are not guaranteed with Rental or Used book purchases.

Purchase Benefits

  • Free Shipping Icon Free Shipping On Orders Over $35!
    Your order must be $35 or more to qualify for free economy shipping. Bulk sales, PO's, Marketplace items, eBooks and apparel do not qualify for this offer.
  • eCampus.com Logo Get Rewarded for Ordering Your Textbooks! Enroll Now
List Price: $124.00 Save up to $41.54
  • Rent Book $82.46
    Add to Cart Free Shipping Icon Free Shipping

    TERM
    PRICE
    DUE
    USUALLY SHIPS IN 3-5 BUSINESS DAYS
    *This item is part of an exclusive publisher rental program and requires an additional convenience fee. This fee will be reflected in the shopping cart.

Supplemental Materials

What is included with this book?

Summary

This law school casebook provides detailed information on federal courts and the law of federal-state relations. The first part of the book explores the intersection of federalism and separation of powers that provide the constitutional foundations of a modern Federal Courts course. Part II covers jurisdiction, and Part III deals with Federal Court enforcement of Federal rights. The final chapter is devoted to certain technically complex questions of remedial interaction, notably the relation of federal habeas corpus to § 1983.

Table of Contents

Introduction iii
Table of Cases
xxix
Table of Secondary Authorities
liii
PART I. FEDERALISM AND SEPARATION OF POWERS: THE BASIC STRUCTURE
1(475)
Choice of Law in the Federal System
2(122)
State Law in Federal Court
2(30)
Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins
2(6)
Notes on State Law in Federal Courts
8(1)
Swift v. Tyson
8(1)
The Legislative History of § 34
9(2)
The Constitutional Premises of Erie
11(1)
Equal Protection
11(1)
Federalism
12(1)
Separation of Powers
13(2)
Examples of Federal Common Law
15(1)
Lawsuits Between States
15(1)
McCulloch v. Maryland
16(1)
The Dormant Commerce Clause
17(1)
Semtek International v. Lockheed Martin
18(1)
Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad
18(1)
Concluding Questions and Comments
19(1)
Notes on the Administration of Erie
20(1)
Substance and Procedure
20(1)
State Law in Non-Diversity Cases
20(1)
Federal Law in Diversity Cases
21(1)
Ascertaining State Law
21(1)
Remedies for Uncertain State Law
22(1)
Decline Jurisdiction
22(1)
Abstention
23(1)
Certified Questions
23(1)
Concluding Questions
24(1)
Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co., Inc.
24(1)
Notes on Choice of State Law by Federal Courts
25(1)
Conflict of Laws
25(1)
Substance and Procedure in Choice of Law
26(1)
Griffin v. McCoach
27(1)
Van Dusen v. Barrack
28(1)
Ferens v. John Deere Co.
29(1)
Majority Opinion
29(2)
The Dissent
31(1)
Federal Law in State Court
32(41)
Notes on the Power of State Courts to Hear Federal Questions
32(1)
Gulf Offshore Co.
32(1)
Tafflin v. Levitt
33(2)
From Power to Duty
35(1)
Howlett v. Rose
35(10)
Notes on the Duty of State Courts to Hear Federal Questions
45(1)
Testa v. Katt
45(1)
Claflin v. Houseman
46(1)
The FELA Cases
47(1)
Mondou
47(1)
Douglas
48(1)
McKnett
48(1)
Pitcairn and Mayfield
49(1)
Questions and Comments
49(2)
The Anti-Commandeering Principle
51(1)
Johnson v. Fankell
52(5)
Notes on the Occasional Duty of State Courts to Apply Federal Procedures
57(1)
Felder v. Casey
57(2)
The FELA Cases
59(1)
Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co.
59(3)
Brown v. Western Railway Co. of Alabama
62(1)
Questions and Comments on the FELA Cases
63(1)
Questions and Comments on Johnson v. Fankell
63(1)
Federal Claims Raised by Defendants
64(1)
Jackson v. Denno
64(1)
Chapman v. California
64(1)
Questions and Comments on Claims Raised by Defendants
65(1)
Notes on Precluding State Courts From Hearing Federal Questions
66(1)
Background
66(1)
Tarble's Case
66(1)
Questions and Comments on Tarble's Case
67(1)
McClung v. Silliman
68(1)
Other Suits Against Federal Officials in State Courts
69(2)
Donovan v. Dallas
71(2)
Questions and Comments on Donovan
73(1)
Supreme Court Review of State Court Decisions
73(51)
Introductory Notes on the Power of the Supreme Court to Review State Court Decisions
73(1)
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
73(3)
Murdock v. City of Memphis
76(3)
Comments
79(1)
Indiana Ex Rel. Anderson v. Brand
79(4)
Notes on Federal Protection of State-Created Rights
83(1)
Questions and Comments on Brand
83(1)
Procedural Due Process
83(1)
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
84(1)
Standard Oil Co. of California v. Johnson
84(2)
Notes on Remote Federal Premise Cases
86(1)
Questions and Comments on Standard Oil v. Johnson
86(1)
State Tax Comm'n v. Van Cott
87(1)
Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.
88(1)
California v. Byers
88(1)
Introductory Notes on the Adequate and Independent State Ground Doctrine
89(1)
Murdock Revisited
89(1)
The Modern Doctrine
90(2)
Michigan v. Long
92(9)
Notes on the Independence of State Grounds
101(1)
Questions and Comments
101(1)
Bibliography
102(1)
Introductory Note on Bush v. Gore
103(1)
Bush v. Gore
103(16)
Notes on the Adequacy of State Grounds
119(1)
NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson
119(1)
State Rules Misapplied
120(1)
Bush v. Gore and Supreme Court Review of State Law
121(1)
Additional Bibliography
122(2)
The Power of the Federal Courts to Create Federal Law
124(111)
Federal Common Law
124(35)
United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co., Inc.
124(8)
Notes on the Law Governing the Rights and Duties of the United States
132(1)
Background
132(1)
Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States
133(1)
Federal or State Law
134(1)
Content of Federal Law
135(1)
Borrowing State Law: DeSylva v. Ballentine
135(3)
Does It Matter How State Law Applies?
138(1)
Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.
138(12)
Notes on the Law Governing the Rights and Duties of Private Parties
150(1)
Background: Suits Between Private Parties
150(1)
Bank of America v. Parnell
150(1)
Wallis v. Pan American Petroleum Corp
151(2)
Miree v. DeKalb County
153(1)
Suits Against Federal Officers
154(1)
Howard v. Lyons
154(1)
Barr v. Matteo
154(1)
Westfall v. Erwin
155(1)
Questions and Comments
156(1)
Notes on Statutes of Limitations for Federal Claims
156(1)
Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates
156(3)
Questions and Comments
159(1)
Implied Rights of Action to Enforce Federal Statutes
159(26)
Cort v. Ash
159(4)
Notes on Implied Rights of Action to Enforce Federal Statutes
163(1)
J.I. Case v. Borak
163(2)
Cannon v. University of Chicago
165(1)
The Majority
165(1)
The Powell Dissent
166(2)
Post-Cannon Restrictions
168(3)
Less Restrictive Decisions
171(1)
Choice of Remedies to Enforce Implied Rights
172(1)
Questions and Comments
172(1)
42 U.S.C. § 1983: A Comparison
173(1)
Bibliography
174(2)
Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District
176(9)
Note on Gebser v. Lago Vista
185(1)
Rights of Action for the United States
185(5)
United States v. Hudson and Goodwin
185(2)
Notes on Judicial Creation of Rights of Action for the United States
187(1)
Questions and Comments
187(1)
United States v. Standard Oil
187(2)
United States v. Gilman
189(1)
Concluding Questions and Comments
189(1)
Rights of Action to Enforce Constitutional Rights
190(32)
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
190(12)
Note on Bivens
202(1)
Schweiker v. Chilicky
202(13)
Notes on Private Rights of Action After Bivens
215(1)
Cases Creating Bivens Actions in Other Contexts
215(1)
Davis v. Passman
215(1)
Carlson v. Green
216(2)
Cases Denying Bivens Actions in Other Contexts
218(1)
Bush v. Lucas
218(2)
United States v. Stanley
220(1)
Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko
221(1)
Questions and Comments
222(1)
Bibliography
222(1)
Customary International Law
222(13)
Filartiga v. Pena-Irala
222(4)
Notes on Customary International Law As Federal Common Law
226(1)
What Is ``Customary International Law''?
226(1)
Customary International Law as Federal Common Law
227(1)
Bradley and Goldsmith: The Attack on Conventional Wisdom
228(2)
The Koh Response
230(1)
The Bradley-Goldsmith Rejoinder
231(1)
The Juvenile Death Penalty
231(2)
Alvarez-Machain v. United States
233(1)
Bibliography
233(2)
Congressional Control of the Federal Courts
235(120)
The Power to Limit Federal Jurisdiction
235(27)
Introductory Notes on the Power to Limit Federal Jurisdiction
235(1)
The Constitutional Text
235(1)
Analysis
235(1)
The Supreme Court
236(1)
The Lower Federal Courts
236(1)
Unfavorable Congressional Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions
236(1)
Marbury v. Madison
237(1)
A Testing Hypothetical: Abortion
238(1)
Congressional Power to Curtail the Jurisdiction of State Courts
238(1)
The Traditional View of Congressional Power to Limit the Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts
239(3)
Concluding Comment
242(1)
Ex Parte McCardle
242(3)
Notes on the Traditional View
245(1)
The Source of Supreme Court Jurisdiction
245(1)
The Significance of McCardle
246(1)
Congressional Power Over the Jurisdiction of the Lower Federal Courts: Sheldon v. Sill
247(1)
Webster v. Doe
248(5)
Questions and Comments
253(1)
Notes on Competing Views of Congressional Power to Limit the Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts
254(1)
Introduction
254(1)
Justice Story
254(2)
The Essential Functions Thesis
256(3)
Independent Unconstitutionality
259(1)
Due Process: Access to Courts
260(1)
Discrimination Against Constitutional Claims
260(1)
Institutional Characteristics of State and Federal Courts
261(1)
The Power to Expand Federal Jurisdiction
262(24)
Introductory Notes on Congressional Authority to Confer Federal Question Jurisdiction on the District Courts
262(1)
Preliminary Comments
262(1)
Osborn v. Bank of the United States
263(2)
The Concept of Protective Jurisdiction
265(1)
Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln Mills
266(7)
Notes on the Constitutionality of Protective Jurisdiction
273(1)
Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria
273(3)
Questions and Comments on Lincoln Mills and Verlinden
276(1)
Modern Variations: Consumer Protection and Nuclear Power
276(1)
Mesa v. California
277(2)
Gutierrez de Martinez v. Lamagno
279(4)
National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co.
283(2)
Note on Tidewater Transfer
285(1)
The Power to Create Non-Article III Courts
286(43)
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
286(27)
Notes on Northern Pipeline
313(1)
Introduction
313(1)
The Rationale
313(1)
Vindication of the Text
314(1)
Separation of Powers
314(1)
Fairness to Litigants
315(1)
Federalism
315(1)
The Aftermath
316(1)
Additional Notes on Non-Article III Adjudication
317(1)
Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products
317(1)
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor
317(2)
Questions and Comments on Article I Courts
319(1)
Administrative Agencies: The Example of the NLRB
320(2)
Questions and Comments on Agency Adjudication and Article III
322(2)
Notes on Internal Delegation of Judicial Authority: U.S. Magistrates
324(1)
Introduction
324(1)
The Magistrates Act of 1968
324(1)
The 1976 Amendments
325(1)
United States v. Raddatz
325(1)
The 1979 Magistrates Act
326(2)
The 1983 Amendments to Rule 53
328(1)
Limitations on the Use of Magistrates
328(1)
Implied Consent to Trial by Magistrate
328(1)
Bibliography
329(1)
The Power to Reopen Final Judgments
329(26)
Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
329(23)
Note on Miller v. French
352(3)
Justiciability
355(121)
Standing
355(59)
Introductory Note on Standing
355(2)
Allen v. Wright
357(18)
Notes on Standing as a Constitutional Requirement
375(1)
The Requirement of Injury: Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the War
375(1)
Questions and Comments on the Requirement of Injury
376(1)
The Requirements of Causation and Redressability: Warth v. Seldin
376(1)
Questions and Comments on the Requirements of Causation and Redressability
377(1)
Duke Power
377(2)
Bibliography
379(2)
Notes on Taxpayer Standing
381(1)
Introduction
381(1)
Frothingham v. Mellon
381(1)
Flast v. Cohen
382(1)
United States v. Richardson
383(1)
Valley Forge
384(1)
The Majority
384(2)
The Dissent
386(1)
Questions and Comments on Taxpayer Standing
387(1)
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
388(15)
Notes on Statutory Standing
403(1)
The ``Citizen Suit'' Provision
403(1)
Questions and Comments on Statutory Standing
404(1)
Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw
405(3)
Raines v. Byrd
408(6)
Related Doctrines
414(45)
Third-Party Standing
414(1)
Singleton v. Wulff
414(7)
Notes on Third--Party Standing
421(1)
Introduction
421(1)
The Third Party's Ability to Raise His or Her Own Rights
422(1)
Barrows v. Jackson
423(1)
Eisenstadt v. Baird
423(1)
Relationship Between Litigant and Third Party
423(1)
Dilution of Third--Party Rights
424(1)
The Overbreadth Doctrine
425(1)
Ripeness
426(1)
Poe v. Ullman
426(6)
Notes on Ripeness
432(1)
Relation to Standing
432(1)
Ripeness in Context
433(1)
Ripeness in Declaratory Judgments: Aetna Life Ins. v. Haworth
434(1)
Questions and Comments on Poe
434(1)
United Public Workers v. Mitchell
435(1)
Ripeness and Standing Revisited: Duke Power
435(2)
Ripeness in Structural Reform Litigation: O'Shea v. Littleton
437(1)
Ripeness in Structural Reform Litigation: Los Angeles v. Lyons
438(1)
Ripeness in the Administrative State: Related Doctrines
439(1)
Mootness
440(1)
Introductory Notes on Mootness
440(1)
Introduction
440(1)
Voluntary Cessation of Illegal Activity
440(1)
Controversies ``Capable of Repetition, Yet Evading Review''
441(1)
Honig v. Doe
442(2)
City of Erie v. Pap's ``Kandyland''
444(1)
DeFunis v. Odegaard
445(2)
United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty
447(9)
Notes on Mootness in Class Actions
456(1)
Sosna v. Iowa
456(1)
Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.
456(1)
Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Roper
457(1)
Questions and Comments on Mootness in Class Actions
458(1)
The Political Question
459(17)
Introductory Notes on the History of the Doctrine
459(1)
Luther v. Borden
459(1)
Baker v. Carr
460(1)
Powell v. McCormack
461(1)
Nixon v. United States
462(8)
Additional Notes on the Political Question
470(1)
Questions and Comments on Nixon v. United States
470(1)
The Political Question Doctrine in Foreign Affairs: Goldwater v. Carter
470(2)
The Political Question Doctrine and Judicial Review
472(2)
Bibliography
474(2)
PART II. THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL COURTS
476(261)
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
477(151)
Federal Question Jurisdiction
477(43)
Introductory Notes on Federal Question Jurisdiction
477(1)
The Statute
477(1)
The Face-of-the-Complaint Rule
477(2)
The Primacy of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
479(1)
Hypothetical Jurisdiction: Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
480(2)
In Personam v. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co.
482(1)
When a Case ``Arises Under'' Federal Law
483(1)
American Well Works
483(1)
Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter
484(1)
Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co
484(1)
Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry
485(1)
Questions and Comments
486(1)
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Thompson
487(2)
Pendent Jurisdiction: United Mine Workers v. Gibbs
489(1)
Pendent Party Jurisdiction: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
490(1)
City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons
491(1)
Bibliography
492(1)
Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson
493(10)
Notes on Preemption as a Basis for Federal Question Jurisdiction
503(1)
Avco Corp. v. Machinists
503(2)
Postscript on the Avco Issue
505(2)
Franchise Tax Board
507(2)
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Taylor
509(2)
Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams
511(1)
Questions and Comments
512(1)
Notes on Federal Question Jurisdiction and Declaratory Judgments
512(1)
Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co
512(1)
A Proposed Rationale for Skelly Oil
513(1)
Franchise Tax Board
514(6)
Footnote on American Well Works
520(1)
Diversity Jurisdiction
520(27)
United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. R.H. Bouligny, Inc.
520(3)
Notes on Diversity Jurisdiction
523(1)
The Debate
523(2)
The Case for Retention
525(1)
The Case for Abolition
526(1)
Strawbridge v. Curtiss
527(1)
Questions and Comments on Bouligny
528(1)
Interpretation of the Diversity Statute
529(3)
Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger
532(9)
Additional Notes on Diversity Jurisdiction
541(1)
Ancillary Jurisdiction
541(2)
Supplemental Jurisdiction: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
543(2)
Collusion: Kramer v. Caribbean Mills
545(1)
Sandbagging
546(1)
The Substance/Procedure Problem
547(40)
Introductory Notes on the Substance/Procedure Problem
547(1)
Background
547(1)
Sibbach v. Wilson
548(1)
Early Decisions on Substance v. Procedure
549(1)
Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
549(8)
Notes on Guaranty Trust
557(1)
Comments and Questions on Guaranty Trust
557(1)
The Varied Meanings of Substance and Procedure
557(1)
Notes on Cases After Guaranty Trust
558(1)
Ragan, Woods, and Cohen
558(1)
Ragan
558(1)
Woods
559(1)
Cohen
560(1)
The Rutledge Dissent
561(1)
Byrd v. Blue Ridge
562(2)
Hanna v. Plumer
564(10)
Notes on Substance and Procedure After Hanna
574(1)
Questions and Comments on Hanna
574(1)
Walker v. Armco Steel Corp
575(2)
Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp
577(2)
Szantay v. Beech Aircraft Corp
579(2)
Marshall v. Mulrenin
581(2)
Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp
583(3)
Bibliography
586(1)
Finality and Appellate Review
587(41)
Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay
587(7)
Notes on Appellate Review of Final Decisions
594(1)
The ``Collateral Order'' Doctrine: Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp
594(1)
Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp
595(2)
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord
597(1)
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Constr. Corp
598(2)
Questions and Comments
600(1)
Footnote on Supreme Court Review of Cases in the Courts of Appeals
601(1)
Notes on Alternative Forms of Circuit Court Review of District Court Judgments
601(1)
Interlocutory Review
601(1)
Rule 54(b)
602(1)
Mandamus
603(1)
Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.
604(1)
Appeal Under § 1291
604(1)
Appeal Under § 1292(a)(1)
605(1)
Mandamus
605(1)
Bibliography
606(1)
Notes on Supreme Court Review of Final Decisions By State Courts
606(1)
Introduction
606(1)
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
607(1)
Federal Issue Conclusive or Outcome Preordained
608(1)
Federal Issue Will Survive Anyway
608(1)
Federal Issue Cannot Be Reviewed Later
609(1)
Later Review Would Seriously Erode Federal Policy
609(2)
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn: The Dissent
611(1)
Southland Corp. v. Keating
612(1)
Hathorn v. Lovorn
613(1)
Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana
614(2)
Questions and Comments
616(1)
Additional Notes on Technical Aspects of Supreme Court Review of State Decisions
617(1)
Initiating Review
617(1)
The Meaning of Summary Disposition of Appeals
618(2)
Decision by the ``Highest State Court''
620(1)
Federal Question Raised Properly, Preserved, and Decided
620(1)
The Relevance of Federal Rules of Standing: ASARCO, Inc. v. Kadish
620(4)
Dept. of Labor v. Triplett
624(1)
Nike, Inc. v. Karsky
625(3)
Abstention
628(109)
General Principles
628(20)
Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States
628(9)
Notes on Concurrent Litigation in State and Federal Courts
637(1)
The Starting Point
637(1)
Recognized Exceptions
637(1)
Declaratory Judgments
638(2)
Questions and Comments on Colorado River
640(1)
Bibliography
640(1)
Notes on Burford Abstention
641(1)
Introduction
641(1)
Burford Abstention
641(2)
A Confusing Interlude
643(1)
Mashuda
643(1)
Thibodaux
644(1)
Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W.S. Ranch Co
645(1)
Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co.
646(1)
Bibliography
647(1)
Pullman Abstention
648(14)
Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Co.
648(3)
Notes on Pullman Abstention
651(1)
Siler v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co.
651(1)
Questions and Comments on Pullman
652(1)
Wisconsin v. Constantineau
652(3)
Notes on Administration of Pullman Abstention
655(1)
Introduction
655(2)
Government Employees v. Windsor
657(1)
England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
658(3)
Harris County Commissioners v. Moore
661(1)
Questions and Comments on the Procedural Consequences of Abstention
661(1)
Younger Abstention
662(58)
Origins
662(1)
Introductory Notes on Federal Injunctions Against State Criminal Proceedings
662(1)
Introduction
662(1)
Douglas v. City of Jeannette
662(1)
Dombrowski v. Pfister
663(1)
Effect of Allegation of Overbreadth
664(1)
Effect of Allegation of Harassment
665(1)
Disposition
665(1)
Resurrection of Invalidated Statute
665(1)
The Harlan Dissent
665(1)
Conclusion
666(1)
Younger v. Harris
666(11)
Notes on Younger v. Harris
677(1)
Introduction
677(1)
Boyle v. Landry
677(1)
Samuels v. Mackell
677(1)
Perez v. Ledesma
678(1)
Questions and Comments on Younger v. Harris
679(1)
The Policies of Younger
680(1)
Ex parte Royall
681(1)
The Younger Exceptions
681(1)
Bibliography
682(1)
Notes on the Relevance of the Anti-Injunction Statute to Younger Abstention
683(1)
Mitchum v. Foster
683(3)
Questions and Comments on Mitchum
686(1)
Criminal Proceedings
686(1)
Steffel v. Thompson
686(10)
Notes on Declaratory and Equitable Relief After Steffel
696(1)
Hicks v. Miranda
696(1)
Doran v. Salem Inn
697(1)
Questions and Comments
698(1)
The Relevance of State Appellate Proceedings
699(1)
Wooley v. Maynard
699(1)
Civil Proceedings
700(1)
Trainor v. Hernandez
700(9)
Notes on the Application of Younger to Civil Proceedings
709(1)
Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.
709(1)
Juidice v. Vail
710(1)
New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New Orleans
711(2)
Questions and Comments on the Extension of Younger to Civil Proceedings
713(1)
Moore v. Sims
713(1)
The Majority
713(2)
The Dissent
715(1)
Questions and Comments on Moore v. Sims
716(1)
Commentary and Bibliography
716(2)
Notes on the Application of Younger to Administrative Proceedings
718(1)
Middlesex County
718(2)
Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff
720(1)
Anti-Injunction Act
720(17)
Introductory Note
720(1)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
721(7)
Notes on the Anti-Injunction Act
728(1)
Toucey v. New York Life Ins. Co
728(1)
Early Litigation Under the 1948 Revision
729(1)
Capital Service
729(1)
Amalgamated Clothing Workers
729(2)
Leiter Minerals
731(1)
NLRB v. Nash-Finch Co
732(1)
The Statutory Exceptions
732(1)
Mitchum v. Foster
733(1)
Vendo Co. v. Lektro--Vend Corp
734(1)
Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama Bank
735(2)
PART III. FEDERAL COURT ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL RIGHTS
737
Habeas Corpus
738
Introductory Notes on Federal Habeas Corpus
738
The Habeas Statute
738
Section 2255
739
Plan of the Chapter
739
The Scope of Review
740
Stone v. Powell
740
Notes on Stone v. Powell
760
The History: Brown v. Allen
760
Questions and Comments on Stone v. Powell
761
Bibliography
762
Notes on Developments After Stone v. Powell
765
Failure to Extend Stone to Other Constitutional Claims
765
Relevance of Stone to Non-Constitutional Claims: Reed v. Farley
766
Harmless Error: Brecht v. Abrahamson
768
The Teague Interlude
770
Wright v. West
774
The 1996 Legislation
774
Terry Williams v. Taylor
775
Notes on the 1996 Legislation
796
Questions and Comments on Terry Williams v. Taylor
796
Bell v. Cone
797
Horn v. Banks
799
Miller-El v. Cockrell
799
Additional Ambiguities
801
Bibliography
802
Procedural Foreclosure
802
Notes on Procedural Foreclosure
802
The Exhaustion Requirement
802
Daniels v. Allen
803
Fay v. Noia
803
Wainwright v. Sykes
806
The Majority
807
The Dissent
810
The Meaning of ``Cause''
813
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Massaro v. United States
815
Finality of Completed Sentences Used to Enhance a Current Sentence
816
State Court Forfeitures and Federal Common Law
817
Bibliography
818
Notes on Keeney v. Tamayo--Reyes: Retrial of Issues of Fact
819
Brown v. Allen
819
Townsend v. Sain
819
Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes
821
Lee v. Kemna
824
Notes on Procedural Foreclosure Under the 1996 Legislation
841
Effect of Prior Litigation of the Facts in State Court
841
Effect of Failure to Litigate Claims in State Court
842
Michael Wayne Williams v. Taylor
843
Questions and Comments on Michael Wayne Williams v. Taylor
847
The New Legislation in Capital Cases
848
Exhaustion of State Remedies and Repetitive Applications
850
Rose v. Lundy
850
Notes on Exhaustion of State Remedies and Repetitive Applications
863
Ex parte Royall
863
The Nature of the Requirement: Fay v. Noia
864
Repetitive Applications: Sanders v. United States
865
McCleskey v. Zant
866
Limitation Periods Under the 1996 Legislation
866
Repetitive Applications Under the 1996 Legislation
867
The Constitutionality of the 1996 Legislation: Felker v. Turpin
868
Questions and Comments on the 1996 Legislation
870
Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
871
Questions and Comments on Martinez-Villareal
873
Duncan v. Walker
874
Tyler v. Cain
883
Claims of Innocence
893
Herrera v. Collins
893
Notes on Herrera v. Collins
914
The 1996 Legislation
914
Bibliography
915
Bousley v. United States
916
State Sovereign Immunity and the 11th Amendment
927
Nature of the Limitation
927
Introductory Notes on the Origins and Meaning of the 11th Amendment
927
Chisholm v. Georgia
927
Reaction to Chisholm
928
The Next Hundred Years
928
Hans v. Louisiana
929
The Immunity Interpretation
931
Concluding Comments
932
Ex Parte Young
933
Notes on Alternative Interpretations of the 11th Amendment
937
Injunctive Relief Against State Officers
937
The Diversity Interpretation
938
The Separation of Powers Interpretation
940
Concluding Comments
942
Additional Bibliography
942
Additional Notes on Ex Parte Young
944
The Anti-Injunction Act
944
Subsequent Legislative Limitations on Ex parte Young
944
Footnote on the Cause of Action
945
Edelman v. Jordan
946
Notes on State Immunity Against Award of Damages
956
Ford Motor Co. v. Department of the Treasury
956
Milliken v. Bradley (II)
958
Rosado v. Wyman
959
Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
959
Appealability of Immunity Denials: Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc
960
11th Amendment Immunity for Local Governments
961
Notes on the Intersection of the 11th Amendment and State Law
962
Suits Against One State in the Courts of Another: Nevada v. Hall
962
Federal Injunctions Against States Based on State Law: Penn hurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
963
Consent and Congressional Abrogation
966
Introductory Notes on State Consent to Suit and Congressional Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity
966
State Consent
966
Congressional Abrogation: Parden v. Terminal Ry
967
Congressional Abrogation: Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
967
State Liability Under § 1983: Quern v. Jordan and Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
968
The Requirement of Clear Statement: Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon
969
Welch v. Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation
969
Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co
970
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
971
Notes on Seminole Tribe
992
Bibliography
992
Alden v. Maine
993
The Majority Opinion
993
The Dissent
998
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
1001
The Majority Opinion
1002
The Dissent
1003
Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports Authority
1004
Section 5 of the 14th Amendment
1005
City of Boerne v. Flores
1006
Notes on Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity Under § 5 of the 14th Amendment
1019
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
1019
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
1021
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
1024
Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
1025
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
1026
Bibliography
1033
Does Ex parte Young Survive?
1037
Introductory Note on Coeur D'alene Tribe
1037
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe
1038
Note on Verizon Maryland, Inc. v. Public Service Commission
1046
Constitutionally Required Remedies in State Court
1047
McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco
1047
Notes on the Duty of State Courts to Remedy Constitutional Violations
1056
General Oil v. Crain
1056
Ward v. Love County
1057
Reich v. Collins
1059
Questions and Comments on the Duty of State Courts to Remedy Constitutional Violations
1061
Jackson v. Denno
1063
42 U.S.C. § 1983
1066
``Under Color of'' Law
1066
Monroe v. Pape
1066
Notes on 42 U.S.C. § 1983
1076
Background
1076
The Mind-Set of the Civil Rights Cases
1077
Home Telephone & Telegraph
1078
Questions and Comments on Monroe v. Pape
1079
Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights Actions
1080
Impact of Monroe v. Pape
1080
Notes on Other Civil Rights Acts
1081
Introduction
1081
Reconstruction Legislation
1081
The Act of 1866
1082
The Act of 1870
1082
The Act of 1871
1082
The Act of 1875
1082
Successor Provisions
1082
42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982
1082
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)
1083
18 U.S.C. § 241
1083
18 U.S.C. § 242
1083
Official Immunities
1083
Scheuer v. Rhodes
1083
Notes on Immunity From Award of Damages
1089
Background
1089
Questions and Comments on Scheuer
1089
The Meaning of Absolute Immunity
1090
The Meaning of Qualified Immunity
1091
Wood v. Strickland
1092
Harlow v. Fitzgerald
1094
Crawford-El v. Britton
1098
Anderson v. Creighton
1098
Bibliography
1101
Unnecessary Merits Adjudication
1102
Appealability of Immunity Denials: Mitchell v. Forsyth
1103
The Limits of Mitchell: Johnson v. Jones
1104
Analogous Immunities for Federal Officials
1105
Notes on Immunity From Award of Damages and the Goals of Section 1983
1107
Introduction
1107
Compensation
1107
Deterrence
1108
Qualified vs. Absolute Immunity
1112
Affirmation of Rights
1114
Note on Immunity From Prospective Relief
1116
Governmental Liability
1117
Monell v. Department of Social Services
1117
Notes on Governmental Liability Under § 1983
1128
Questions and Comments on Monell
1128
State as ``Person'' Under § 1983: Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
1129
State Official as ``Person'' When Acting in Official Capacity: Hafer v. Melo
1130
Comment on Judicial Methodology Under § 1983
1132
Owen v. City of Independence
1134
Notes on Owen v. City of Independence
1154
The Due Process Issue
1154
The Immunity Issue
1155
The Significance of Fault
1156
Subsequent Retroactivity Cases
1157
Federal Governmental Liability
1159
Introductory Notes on ``Official Policy''
1160
Introduction
1160
Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati
1160
City of St. Louis v. Praprotnik
1163
Notes on Praprotnik
1178
Questions and Comments
1178
The Significance of State Law: McMillian v. Monroe County
1179
Bibliography
1180
Notes on Failure to Train as ``Official Policy''
1182
Introduction
1182
Oklahoma City v. Tuttle
1182
City of Canton v. Harris
1183
Questions and Comments on Harris
1183
For What Wrongs?
1184
Constitutional Rights Enforceable Under § 1983
1184
Paul v. Davis
1184
Notes on ``Liberty'' and ``Property'' Protected By Due Process
1198
Introduction
1198
Questions and Comments on Paul v. Davis
1198
Siegert v. Gilley
1200
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services
1200
``Liberty'' and ``Property'' and the Relation of State and Federal Law
1204
County of Sacramento v. Lewis
1204
The Role of State Law
1205
Introductory Notes on Parratt v. Taylor and Its Progeny
1205
Parratt v. Taylor
1205
Mental Elements of § 1983
1206
Negligent Deprivation of Due Process
1206
The Process Due
1207
Hudson v. Palmer and Intentional Wrongdoing
1208
Daniels v. Williams and the Meaning of ``Deprivation''
1209
Davidson v. Cannon
1210
Questions and Comments on Parratt and Its Progeny
1212
Zinermon v. Burch
1212
Notes on the Role of State Law
1231
Questions and Comments
1231
Bibliography
1232
Non-Constitutional Rights Enforceable Under § 1983
1233
Maine v. Thiboutot
1233
Notes on Non--Constitutional Rights Enforceable Under § 1983
1244
Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Org
1244
Questions and Comments on Maine v. Thiboutot
1246
National Sea Clammers
1247
Wright v. Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority
1249
Smith v. Robinson
1250
Confusion in the Lower Courts
1251
Commentary and Bibliography
1253
Jett v. Dallas Independent School District: Relation Between § 1981 and § 1983
1254
Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los Angeles: § 1983 Actions to Enforce Federal Preemption of State Law
1255
Dennis v. Higgins: § 1983 Actions to Enforce Negative Commerce Clause Claims
1255
Gonzaga University v. Doe: The Interaction of Section 1983 and Implied Rights of Action
1256
Attorney's Fees
1259
City of Riverside v. Rivera
1259
Notes on Determining Fee Awards
1274
Introduction
1274
``In its Discretion''
1275
``Prevailing Party''
1276
Questions and Comments on City of Riverside
1277
Limited Success: Texas State Teachers Association v. Garland Independent School District
1277
Nominal Success: Farrar v. Hobby
1278
Survival of the Contingent Fee
1279
Expert Witnesses
1280
Fee Awards for Time Spent in Administration Proceedings
1280
Fee Awards for Disputes Settled Prior to Litigation
1281
Bibliography
1283
Introductory Note on Risk Enhancement
1284
City of Burlington v. Dague
1285
Notes on Attorney's Fees and Settlement Negotiations
1295
Attorney's Fees Upon Settlement
1295
Settlement Offers and Rule 68: Marek v. Chesny
1295
The Majority
1296
The Dissent
1297
Questions and Comments on Marek v. Chesny
1298
Settlement Conditioned on Waiver of Fees: Evans v. Jeff D
1298
The Majority
1299
The Dissent
1300
Questions and Comments on Evans
1301
Remedial Interactions
1303
Relation of § 1983 to Habeas Corpus
1303
Preiser v. Rodriguez
1303
Notes on the Relation of § 1983 to Habeas Corpus
1318
Questions and Comments on Preiser
1318
Relation of Preiser to § 1983 Actions for Damages
1318
Heck v. Humphrey
1319
Notes on Damages Suits and State Criminal Proceedings
1331
Questions and Comments
1331
Abstention: Deakins v. Monaghan
1332
Justice Blackmun's Opinion
1332
Justice White's Concurrence
1334
Questions and Comments
1335
Edwards v. Balisok
1336
Res Judicata
1336
Res Judicata
1336
Allen v. McCurry
1336
Notes on Res Judicata in Civil Rights Actions
1347
Migra v. Board of Education
1347
Questions and Comments
1348
Greater Preclusive Effect in Federal Court?
1349
Haring v. Prosise
1350
Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp
1351
McDonald v. City of West Branch
1351
Bibliography
1352
Notes on Res Judicata and Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction
1353
Will v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co.
1353
Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
1354
Questions and Comments
1355
Civil Rights Removal
1356
Introductory Note on Removal in Federal Question and Diversity Cases
1356
Introductory Notes on Civil Rights Removal
1358
The Statute
1358
Strauder and Rives
1359
Georgia v. Rachel
1359
City of Greenwood v. Peacock
1361
The Douglas Dissent
1363
``Is Denied.''
1363
``Cannot Enforce.''
1364
Questions and Comments
1364
Relation to Other Remedies
1365
Section 1443(2)
1365
Johnson v. Mississippi
1366
Additional Notes on Civil Rights Removal
1376
Questions and Comments on Johnson v. Mississippi
1376
Bibliography
1376
Appendix A. The Constitution 1(1)
Appendix B. Selected Federal Statutes 1(1)
Appendix C. Judicial Review 1

Supplemental Materials

What is included with this book?

The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

The Used, Rental and eBook copies of this book are not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included. This is true even if the title states it includes any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.

Rewards Program