Measuring Judicial Activism

by Lindquist, Stefanie; Cross, Frank

• ISBN13: 9780195370850
• ISBN10: 0195370856
• Format: Hardcover
• Copyright: 2009-04-13
• Publisher: Oxford University Press

Summary

Measuring Judicial Activism supplies empirical analysis to the widely discussed concept of judicial activism at the United States Supreme Court. Complaints about activist Court decisions are common within contemporary political discourse, but these objections often have little substantivemeaning beyond the speaker's disagreement with particular case outcomes. Frequently debated by legal scholars, judicial activism is shaped by the participants' ideological perspectives as well as by their subjective views regarding ambiguous constitutional provisions. Although no study can beperfectly objective, Measuring Judicial Activism seeks to move beyond these more subjective debates by conceptualizing activism in non-ideological terms, identifying specific empirical dimensions to the concept, and measuring those dimensions using systematic social scientific techniques. In sodoing, the book allows the authors to assess the relative "activism" of recent justices on the Court. Stefanie Lindquist and Frank B. Cross's work is guided theoretically by the notion that, at its core, the concept of activism involves concerns over the judiciary's institutional aggrandizement at the expense of the elected branches. An important corollary idea is that such efforts are particularly"activist" when they further the justices' own policy or ideological objectives. From these core theoretical ideas, the authors identify specific empirical manifestations that reflect the expansion of judicial power. In particular, the authors evaluate the Court's exercise of judicial review toinvalidate legislative and executive action. Lindquist and Cross also analyze the justices' willingness to expand the Court's power by granting litigants increased access to the courts and overruling the Court's own precedents. In these contexts, Measuring Judicial Activism considers the extent towhich these actions are consistent with the justices' ideological predilections.

Author Biography

Frank B. Cross is the Herbert D. Kelleher Centennial Professor of Business Law at the University of Texas School of Law and the author of The Theory and Practice of Statutory Interpretation (Stanford University Press, forthcoming 2008); Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (Stanford University Press, 2007); Frank B. Cross & Robert A. Prentice, Law and Corporate Finance (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007).
Stefanie Lindquist is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt University and the co-author of Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Appellate Court Decision Making (with Virginia Hettinger & Wendy Martinek (University of Virginia Press, 2006).

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments	p. ix
List of Figures and Tables	p. xi
The Political and Academic Debate Over Judicial Activism	p. 1
Identifying Judicial Activism	p. 29
Judicial Review of Federal Statutes	p. 47
Judicial Review of State and Local Laws	p. 65
Judicial Review of Executive Branch Actions	p. 85
Justiciability and Judicial Activism	p. 105
Overruling Supreme Court Precedents	p. 121
A Multidimensional View of Judicial Activism	p. 133
References	p. 151
Table of Cases	p. 167
Index	p. 171
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.