Nursing, Physician Control, and the Medical Monopoly

by Group, Thetis M.

• ISBN13: 9780253339263
• ISBN10: 025333926X
• Format: Hardcover
• Copyright: 2001-09-01
• Publisher: Indiana Univ Pr
• More Book Details
• Purchase Benefits

Summary

Nursing, Physician Control, and the Medical Monopoly traces the efforts by physicians over time to achieve a monopoly in health care, often by subordinating nurses - their only genuine competitor. Efforts by nurses to reform many aspects of health care have been repeatedly opposed by physicians whose primary interest has been to achieve total control of the health care "system," often to the detriment of patients' health and safety.In Part I, Thetis M. Group and Joan I. Roberts present the activities of early women healers and nurses. The authors document the erosion of these women's independence and influence, as increasingly they were subordinated to physician control and authority.In Part II they examine nurse-physician relations from the early 1900s onward. The sexist domination of nursing by medicine was neither haphazard nor accidental, but a structured and institutionalised phenomenon. Efforts by nurses to achieve greater autonomy were often blocked by hospital administrators and organised medicine. The consolidation of the medical monopoly during the 1920s and 1930s, along with the waning of feminism, led to the concretisation of gendered stereotyped roles in nursing and medicine. The growing unease in nurse-physician relations escalated from the 1940s to the 1960s; the growth and complexity of the health-care industry, expanding scientific knowledge, and increasing physician specialisation all created heavy demands on nurses.Conflict between organised medicine and nursing entered a public, open phase in the late 1960s and 1970s when medicine unilaterally created the physician's assistant, countered by nursing's development of the advanced nurse practitioner. The issue of nursing autonomy was directly related to the re-emergence of feminism, bringing into question the stereotype of nurse as physician's loyal "right arm." At the same time, consumers were increasingly unhappy with the inadequate, fragmented, and costly health care system.The gender stereotypes that remained central to nurse-physician relations in the 1980s and into the 1990s are documented in Part III. Various media portrayals still show nurses as subservient to physicians. Nevertheless, nurses have become more outspoken in their criticisms of organised medicine, lobbying to change antitrust laws, proving their cost effectiveness, and documenting the quality of their patient care, consistently equal to or better than that of physicians.Finally, Thetis Group and Joan Roberts examine the results of the medical monopoly, from the impact on patients' health and safety, to the development of HMOs and the current overpriced, poorly co-ordinated and fragmented health care system. Medicine's monopoly of health care and its domination over nursing has made it difficult for nurses to enact their own values, change state license and practice laws, and broaden their access to and practice with patients. Their commendable efforts to gain more autonomy and independence continue into the 21st century.

Author Biography

Thetis M. Group is Professor Emerita at Syracuse University, where she was Dean of the College of Nursing for ten years. She is also adjunct faculty member at the University of Utah College of Nursing. She is co-author of Feminism and Nursing and has published numerous articles in professional nursing journals.

Joan I. Roberts, social psychologist, is Professor Emerita at Syracuse University. A pioneer in Women's Studies in higher education, she is co-author of Feminism and Nursing and author of numerous books and articles on gender issues and racial and sex discrimination.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments	ix
General Introduction	xiii
Nursing, Physician Control, and the Medical Monopoly: An Overview	xxxiii
PART I. ``Exposing the Meretricious Lies'': Early Women Healers and Nurses and the Mythology of Medicine's ``Natural'' Supremacy over Healing
``The Mere Trivia of History''? The Legacy of Early Women Healers and Physicians' Efforts to Exclude or Control Them	3	(34)
``She Hath Done What She Could'': Reforming Nursing as Physicians Tighten the Medical Monopoly in Great Britain, 1800s to the Early 1900s	37	(38)
The Search for American Nursing Origins: Differing Approaches to the History of Nursing and the Medical Monopoly in the United States, 1800s to the Early 1900s	75	(30)
PART II. The Purposeful Move toward Dominance: Subordinating Nurses and Achieving a Medical Monopoly
``For Their Own Good'': Physicians Manipulating, Trivializing, and Coercing Nurses, Later 1800s to the 1920s	105	(42)
``The Exclusive Guardians of All Matters of Health'': The Consolidation of Medical Monopoly in the 1920s and 1930s	147	(27)
A Growing Unease: Nurse-Physician Interprofessional Relations from the 1940s to the 1960s	174	(28)
Reconciling Practice with Protest and Confrontation with Cooperation: Nurse-Physician Relations in the 1970s	202	(71)
PART III. An Outdated, Burdensome Model of Monopolistic Control: Entering the Twenty-First Century with a Fractured Health-Care System and Continuing Medical Opposition to Nurses' Autonomy
Who Needs the Autonomous Professional Nurse? Gender Stereotypes Remain Central to Nurse-Physician Relations	273	(50)
Challenges to the Medical Monopoly: Nurses' Gains in Direct Payment, Hospital Privileges, Prescriptive Authority, and Expanded Practice Laws	323	(73)
The Results of the Medical Monopoly: ``A Regulatory and Policy Making Quagmire''	396	(81)
References	477	(30)
Index	507