Preface | ix | ||
Chapter 1 The Bush Blitz | 1 | (24) | |
Chapter 2 The Cornerstone | 25 | (18) | |
Chapter 3 The Legacy of Ida May Fuller | 43 | (12) | |
Chapter 4 The Assumption Game | 55 | (18) | |
Chapter 5 The Reagan Revolution Meets the Baby Boom | 73 | (20) | |
Chapter 6 The Myth of the Mythical Trust Fund | 93 | (20) | |
Chapter 7 Reform Comes Unstuck | 113 | (12) | |
Chapter 8 The Privateers | 125 | (18) | |
Chapter 9 The Ownership Scam 1: Risk or Reward? | 143 | (26) | |
Chapter 10 The Ownership Scam 2: Costs or Benefits? | 169 | (16) | |
Chapter 11 Bush Stacks the Deck | 185 | (20) | |
Chapter 12 Operation Shock and Awe | 205 | (16) | |
Chapter 13 What's Really Wrong with Social Security (and How to Fix It) | 221 | (24) | |
Notes | 245 | (10) | |
Bibliography | 255 |
The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.
The Used, Rental and eBook copies of this book are not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included. This is true even if the title states it includes any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.
On January 11, 2005, President George W. Bush perched himself on a stool onstage at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium in Washington, flanked by a few dozen ostensibly ordinary American citizens.
Addressing his audience from beneath the gilded colonnade of the grand old government hall, he thanked them for coming that day "to talk about one of the great causes of our generation, and that is how to strengthen and save Social Security for generations to come." Gripping a plump microphone and speaking in his characteristic tone of folksy earnestness before a national television audience, he reiterated his already familiar admonition that the national pension and disability program was mortally ill. His onstage companions, including a young Utah dairy farmer, an ambulance company operator from the state of Washington, a Maryland businesswoman and her elderly mother, and a bright young official from the Social Security Administration itself, listened raptly as he warned that Social Security might well not exist when the time came for them to retire.
"If you're twenty years old, in your mid-twenties, and you're beginning to work, I want you to think about a Social Security system that will be flat bust ... bankrupt, unless the United States Congress has got the willingness to act now," he said. "And that's what we're here to talk about, a system that will be bankrupt."
The best way to protect themselves from that dreadful outcome,he said, was to keep some of the money they were payingeach year into this rickety Depression-era system and invest it bythemselves, for themselves. And he was determined to push alaw through Congress setting up a system of private retirementaccounts that would enable them to do exactly that.
George Bush had been thinking about Social Security reform atleast as far back as his tenure as governor of Texas, when he hadinvited experts to his ranch to chat about the program's future.He made reform a major plank in his 2000 presidential campaign,and became convinced that his endorsement of private accountshad been an essential factor in his electoral victory. Onceinaugurated, he promptly made good on his campaign rhetoricby appointing a blue-ribbon reform commission to craft a privatizationplan. But as a domestic policy initiative Social Securitygot overwhelmed by the 9/11 attack and, subsequently, by theIraq war.
Immediately following his reelection, however, the presidentlaunched a blitzkrieg on Social Security. In nationally televisedspeeches, appearances before blue-ribbon White House economicconferences and interviews with trusted journalists, Bush, renowned for his ability to stay "on message," delivered thegospel of radical reform, often repeating the same phrases byrote. The centerpiece of this program was a system that wouldallow workers to withhold a few percentage points of the 12.4percent payroll tax from the system and invest the money ontheir own. The reform would relieve Social Security of its crushingdeficit, he contended, while giving every American a personalretirement stake that could be bequeathed to survivors. "At thesame time that you manage your own account, you own yourown account," the president proclaimed to the Mellon Auditoriumcrowd. "I love promoting ownership in America."
Administration officials and Republican legislators fannedout to the Sunday TV talk shows to warn of the imminent crisisand pitch privatization as the solution. Callers to the Social SecurityAdministration's help line heard not music while they languishedon hold, but messages warning of the program'slooming insolvency and the necessity of hasty, dramatic change.White House fundraisers started to squeeze their most dependablecontributors to pay for a television campaign budgeted at acool $100 million. The campaign's architects billed the effort toremake Social Security as "one of the most important conservativeundertakings of modern times" and "one of the most significantconservative governing achievements ever."
Their goal was no less than to dismantle one of the last survivingedifices of the New Deal.
President Bush has called his proposed policy "a promise toreform and preserve Social Security."
In fact, his proposal would neither reform nor preserve SocialSecurity. In the name of preservation, it would destroy thenation's most comprehensive social insurance program and replace it with a system bearing enormous costs and risks for millionsof workers and retirees.
The Social Security privatizers dress up their proposal withthe premise that all Americans will be able to earn annual investmentreturns in the stock market of 7 or 8 percent a year,after inflation -- a figure that makes the putative return on SocialSecurity payroll taxes look paltry indeed. The market will makeevery American owning a private account a millionaire upon retirement,they say. (The New York Times headlined a recent op-edpiece on the topic by former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill, adevout privateer, "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?")
What they don't tell you is that many economists questionthe likelihood of consistently earning such a return from stocks.In fact, they say it's almost impossible. For U.S. equities to turnin that kind of performance over the next several decades, theoverall U.S. economy would have to grow at a pace that, all byitself, would place Social Security on the strongest fiscal footingin its history -- not only far from bankrupt, but rich enough tobail out the rest of the federal government. (This is according tothe Social Security system's own estimates.)
The privatizers don't mention, moreover, that the new systemwould require such complicated administrative oversight that theSocial Security Administration, perhaps the most efficient arm ofthe federal government, would have to hire as many as 100,000new employees. (This estimate comes from an executive at FidelityInvestments, which favors private accounts.) Account managementfees -- which would flow to some of the same financialservices companies backing the privatization campaign -- wouldeat up a good portion of the workers' savings ...
The Plot Against Social Security
Excerpted from The Plot Against Social Security: How the Bush Administration Is Endangering Our Financial Future by Michael Hiltzik
All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.