Issue 1n++n++n++n++Are Courts Strangling Businesses with Tort Suits?n++n++1 n++n++1.1n++n++Jan M. Ambrose and Anne Carroll | |
from n++Medical Malpractice Reform and Insurer Claims Defense: Unintended Effects?n++Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law(October 2007)n++n++4 n++n++1.2n++n++Paul H. Rubin and Joanna M. Shepherd | |
from n++Tort Reform and Accidental Deaths,n++Journal of Law and Economics(May 2007)n++n++17 n++n++1.3n++n++W. Kip Viscusi | |
from n++Tort Reform and Insurance Markets,n++Risk Management & Insurance Review(vol. 9, 2004)n++n++26 n++n++1.4n++n++Edith Greene, David Coon, and Brian Bornstein | |
from n++The Effects of Limiting Punitive Damage Awards,n++ Law & Human Behavior (June 2001)n++n++38 n++n++1.5n++n++State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell et al., U.S. Supreme Court (2003)n++n++50Issue 2n++n++n++n++Should An Employee Be Able to Be Fired for Any Reason?n++n++65 n++n++2.1n++n++n++How At-Will Employment Is Changing,n++HR Focus(October 2007)n++n++68 n++n++2.2n++n++Julie Jones | |
from n++Give a Little Whistle: The Need for a More Broad Interpretation of the Whistleblower Exception to the Employment-at-Will Doctrine,n++Texas Tech Law Review(vol. 34, 2003)n++n++73 n++n++2.3n++n++Nancy Baumgarten | |
from n++Sometimes the Road Less Traveled Is Less Traveled for a Reason: The Need for Change in Georgian++s Employment-at-Will Doctrine and Refusal to Adopt the Public Policy Exception,n++Georgia Law Review(vol. 35, 2001)n++n++86 n++n++2.4n++n++Frank Scialdone | |
from n++Sexual Orientation-Based Workplace Discrimination: Carving a Public Policy Exception to Ohion++s At-Will Employment Doctrine,n++Law & Sexuality(vol. 11, 2002)n++n++96 n++n++2.5n++n++Katy Rand | |
from n++Employment at Will in Maine: RIP?n++Maine Bar Journal(vol. 22, 2007)n++n++105Issue 3n++n++n++n++To What Extent Should the Board of Directors Be Free to Make Business Decisions?n++n++120 n++n++3.1n++n++Douglas M. Branson | |
from n++The Indiana Supreme Court Lecture: The Rule That Isnn++t a Rulen++The Business Judgment Rule,n++n++Valparaiso University Law Review(Summer 2002)n++n++123 n++n++3.2n++n++Denise Ping Lee | |
from n++The Business Judgment Rule: Should It Protect Nonprofi t Directors?n++Columbia Law Review(May 2003)n++n++133 n++n++3.3n++n++Stuart K. Patrick v. Herbert Allen et al. | |
from United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (2005)n++n++144 n++n++3.4n++n++Leonard M. Baynes | |
from n++Racial Stereotypes, Broadcast Corporations, and the Business Judgment Rule.n++n++University of Richmond Law Review(March 2003)n++n++148Issue 4n++n++n++n++When Is Someone Acting on Your Behalf?n++n++167 n++n++4.1n++n++Chad P. Wade | |
from n++The Double Doctrine Agent,n++Valparaiso University Law Review(Fall 2007)n++n++171 n++n++4.2n++n++Thomas Genovese and Linda Genovese v. Joseph Bergeron and Theresa Bergeron | |
from Court of Appeals of South Carolina (1997)n++n++181 n++n++4.3n++n++Elizabeth Heinrich | |
from n++Selected Recent Court Decisionsn++Malpractice: Vicarious Liability Under Apparent Agency:James v. Ingalls Memorial Hospital,n++American Journal of Law & Medicine(1998)n++n++184 n++n++4.4n++n++William Hennessey | |
from n++Agency Law: Extending the Common Knowledge Doctrine,n++Florida Law Review(January 1995)n++n++186 n++n++4.5n++n+ | |
Table of Contents provided by Publisher. All Rights Reserved. |
The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.
The Used, Rental and eBook copies of this book are not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included. This is true even if the title states it includes any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.